Cited by 595Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeChildren's Rights and Participation

Evidence That School-Age Children Can Self-Report on Their Health

Riley, Anne W.·2004·Ambulatory Pediatrics

Abstract

The value of obtaining children's reports about their health from questionnaires is a topic of considerable debate in clinical pediatrics and child health research. Evidence from the following areas can inform the debate: 1) studies of parent-child agreement or concordance about the child's health state, 2) basic research on the development of children's cognitive abilities, 3) cognitive interviewing studies of children's abilities to respond to questionnaires and of influences on their responses, 4) psychometric studies of child-report questionnaires, and 5) longitudinal research on the value of children's reports. This review makes a case for the utility of child rather than parent-proxy reports for many, though not all, applications. The review summarizes evidence in terms of the value and limitations of child questionnaire reports. Research demonstrates adequate understanding and reliability and validity of child reports of their health even at age 6, which increases after age 7 in general populations. The reliability of reports by children 8-11 years old is quite good on health questionnaires developed especially for this age group. Children's personal reports provide a viable means of monitoring internal experiences of health and distress during childhood and adolescence, which can enhance understanding about trajectories of health and development of illnesses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1367/a03-178r.1

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riley, A. W.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Riley, Anne W.
Venue
Ambulatory Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
371-376
ISSN
1530-1567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155761042
Cited by
595
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 25
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ambulatory Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
Keywords
child self-report, Child Health Questionnaire, parent-child agreement, cognitive interviewing, child cognitive development, psychometric validity, child distress, proxy reporting
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Health Status, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Self Care, Reproducibility of Results, Self-Examination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review