Cited by 63Child Welfare and AdoptionAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesInfant Development and Preterm Care

Stereotypies in children with a history of early institutional care

Open access
Bos, Karen J., Zeanah, Charles H., Smyke, Anna T., Fox, Nathan A., Nelson, Charles A.·2010·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of stereotypies in children with a history of early institutional care, evaluate the efficacy of a foster care intervention compared with institutional care on the course of stereotypies, and describe correlates in language, cognition, and anxiety for children who exhibit stereotypies. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Institutions in Bucharest, Romania. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-six children with a history of early institutional care. Intervention Comparison of a foster care intervention with continued care as usual in an institution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of stereotypies as well as outcomes in language, cognition, and anxiety. RESULTS: At the baseline assessment prior to placement in foster care (average age of 22 months), more than 60% of children in institutional care exhibited stereotypies. Follow-up assessments at 30 months, 42 months, and 54 months indicated that being placed in families significantly reduced stereotypies, and with earlier and longer placements, reductions became larger. For children in the foster care group, but not in the care as usual group, stereotypies were significantly associated with lower outcomes on measures of language and cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotypies are prevalent in children with a history of institutional care. A foster care intervention appears to have a beneficial/moderating role on reducing stereotypies, underscoring the need for early placement in home-based care for abandoned children. Children who continue to exhibit stereotypies after foster care placement are significantly more impaired on outcomes of language and cognition than children without stereotypies and thus may be a target for further assessments or interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.47

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scores for both types of RAD and stereotypies distinguish children with histories of institutional rearing from never institutionalized children.

    “Scores for both types of RAD and stereotypies also distinguish children with histories of institutional rearing from never institutionalized children.2, 22”
  • Children placed in foster care in the BEIP had significantly fewer symptoms of internalizing disorders, attachment disorders, and stereotyped movement disorders than children who continued institutional care.

    “To date, investigators have reported that children placed in foster care had significantly fewer symptoms of internalizing disorders, 6 attachment disorders, 21 and stereotyped movement disorders 22 compared to children receiving continued institutional care.”
  • Children with a history of institutionalization have an increased likelihood of demonstrating repetitive movements such as stereotypies.

    “Children with a history of institutionalization also have an increased likelihood of demonstrating repetitive movements such as stereotypies.17”
  • High-quality foster care adds to the growing list of developmental domains that are altered in children with a history of institutionalization and can be improved by foster care.

    “this adds to the growing list of developmental domains that are altered in children with a history of institutionalization and can be improved by foster care, including attachment,15, 23, 24 stereotypies,17 language,38–40 cognition,31, 41 depression, anxiety,42, 43 and growth.44”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bos, K. J., Zeanah, C. H., Smyke, A. T., Fox, N. A., & Nelson, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2010-05-01
Volume
164
Issue
5
Pages
406-11
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150979813
Cited by
63
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
19.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091363)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
stereotypy, foster care, institutionalized children, abandoned children, language development, cognitive development, anxiety
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Child Development, Child Welfare, Child, Institutionalized, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Infant, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychosocial Deprivation, Romania, Stereotyping, Prevalence, Chi-Square Distribution, Caregivers, Statistics, Nonparametric, Reactive Attachment Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review