Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Depression Rating Scales: A Critical Review

Carroll, Bernard J.·1973·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS) and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SRS) were compared in 67 depressed patients from three settings–inpatient, day hospital, and general practice. The HRS distinguished the subgroups clearly but the SRS did not. Correlations between the scales for total scores and for most individual items were not of a high order. The low concordance between psychiatrist ratings and self-ratings is discussed with reference to their information access, sensitivity, utility, orientation, and specificity. Self-ratings may be useful for detecting the presence of symptoms but not for quantifying depression as a disorder. The Zung SRS is not recommended for use in research studies. There is a need for new self-rating depression scales oriented, like the HRS, toward the behavioral and somatic features of depressive illness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1973.01750330049009

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Carroll, B. J.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1973-03-01
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
361
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007570230
Cited by
314
References
26
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depression Rating Scales: A Critical Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1973.01750330049009
The paper
Carroll, B. J. (1973). Depression Rating Scales: A Critical Review. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1973.01750330049009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.