Cited by 441Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and AccessPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Integrated Medical Care for Patients With Serious Psychiatric Illness: A Randomized Trial

Druss, Benjamin G., Rohrbaugh, Robert M., Levinson, Carolyn M., Rosenheck, Robert A.·2001·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This randomized trial evaluated an integrated model of primary medical care for a cohort of patients with serious mental disorders. METHODS: A total of 120 individuals enrolled in a Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health clinic were randomized to receive primary medical care through an integrated care initiative located in the mental health clinic (n = 59) or through the VA general medicine clinic (n = 61). Veterans who obtained care in the integrated care clinic received on-site primary care and case management that emphasized preventive medical care, patient education, and close collaboration with mental health providers to improve access to and continuity of care. Analyses compared health process (use of medical services, quality of care, and satisfaction) and outcomes (health and mental health status and costs) between the groups in the year after randomization. RESULTS: Patients treated in the integrated care clinic were significantly more likely to have made a primary care visit and had a greater mean number of primary care visits than those in the usual care group. They were more likely to have received 15 of the 17 preventive measures outlined in clinical practice guidelines. Patients assigned to the integrated care clinic had a significantly greater improvement in health as measured by the physical component summary score of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey than patients assigned to the general medicine clinic (4.7 points vs -0.3 points, P<.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in any of the measures of mental health symptoms or in total health care costs. CONCLUSION: On-site, integrated primary care was associated with improved quality and outcomes of medical care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.58.9.861

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our HRs reflect recent standardised mortality ratio estimates from the UK.

    “In particular, suicide rates were lower than would be expected from Office for National Statistics (ONS) data67 but we would not expect these to be differential by diagnostic group and our HRs reflect recent standardised mortality ratio estimates from the UK.4,68”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Druss, B. G., Rohrbaugh, R. M., Levinson, C. M., & Rosenheck, R. A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
58
Issue
9
Pages
861
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144688807
Cited by
441
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7k08mh001556-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K08 MH01556)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
integrated care, primary care, severe mental illness, veterans, case management, preventive medicine, continuity of care, health care access, physical health outcomes, mental health outcomes, health care costs, quality of care, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Services Research, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Preventive Health Services, Primary Health Care, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review