Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Effectiveness Trial of Stepped Collaborative Care forAcutely Injured Trauma Survivors

Zatzick, Douglas, Roy-Byrne, Peter, Russo, Joan, Rivara, Frederick, Droesch, RoseAnne, Wagner, Amy, Dunn, Chris, Jurkovich, Gregory, Uehara, Edwina, Katon, Wayne·2004·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol abuse frequently occur among acutely injured trauma survivors, few real-world interventions have targeted these disorders. OBJECTIVE: We tested the effectiveness of a multifaceted collaborative care (CC) intervention for PTSD and alcohol abuse. DESIGN: Randomized effectiveness trial. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited a population-based sample of 120 male and female injured surgical inpatients 18 or older at a level I trauma center. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to the CC intervention (n = 59) or the usual care (UC) control condition (n = 61). The CC patients received stepped care that consisted of (1) continuous postinjury case management, (2) motivational interviews targeting alcohol abuse/dependence, and (3) evidence-based pharmacotherapy and/or cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with persistent PTSD at 3 months after injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used the PTSD symptomatic criteria (PTSD Checklist) at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after injury, and alcohol abuse/dependence (Composite International Diagnostic Interview) at baseline and 6 and 12 months after injury. RESULTS: Random-coefficient regression analyses demonstrated that over time, CC patients were significantly less symptomatic compared with UC patients with regard to PTSD (P =.01) and alcohol abuse/dependence (P =.048). The CC group demonstrated no difference (-0.07%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.2% to 4.3%) in the adjusted rates of change in PTSD from baseline to 12 months, whereas the UC group had a 6% increase (95% CI, 3.1%-9.3%) during the year. The CC group showed on average a decrease in the rate of alcohol abuse/dependence of -24.2% (95% CI, -19.9% to -28.6%), whereas the UC group had on average a 12.9% increase (95% CI, 8.2%-17.7%) during the year. CONCLUSIONS: Early mental health care interventions can be feasibly and effectively delivered from trauma centers. Future investigations that refine routine acute care treatment procedures may improve the quality of mental health care for Americans injured in the wake of individual and mass trauma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.498

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Zatzick, D., Roy-Byrne, P., Russo, J., Rivara, F., Droesch, R., Wagner, A., Dunn, C., Jurkovich, G., Uehara, E., & Katon, W.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
498
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104679446
Cited by
350
References
15
FWCI
17.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial of Stepped Collaborative Care forAcutely Injured Trauma Survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.498
The paper
Zatzick, D., Roy-Byrne, P., Russo, J., Rivara, F., Droesch, R., Wagner, A., Dunn, C., Jurkovich, G., Uehara, E., & Katon, W. (2004). A Randomized Effectiveness Trial of Stepped Collaborative Care forAcutely Injured Trauma Survivors. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.5.498

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.