The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Means of Assessing Maximal Oxygen Intake: Correlation Between Field and Treadmill Testing
Abstract
One hundred and fifteen US Air Force male officers and airmen were evaluated on a 12-minute field performance test and on a treadmill maximal-oxygen-consumption test. The correlation of the field-test data with the laboratory-determined oxygen-consumption data was 0.897. The significance of this relationship makes it possible to estimate with considerable accuracy the maximal oxygen consumption from only the results of the 12-minute performance test. This test is readily adaptable to large groups, requires minimum equipment, and appears to be a better indicator of cardiovascular fitness than the more commonly accepted 600-yard run. Because of the high correlation with maximal oxygen consumption, it can be assumed that the 12-minute field performance test is an objective measure of physical fitness reflecting the cardiovascular status of an individual.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test
(2002) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 · Cited by 11,195
Ross, R., Blair, S. N., Arena, R., Church, T. S., Després, J.-P., Franklin, B. A., Haskell, W. L., Kaminsky, L. A., Levine, B. D., Lavie, C. J., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000461 · Cited by 2,486
Steffen, T. M., Hacker, T. A., & Mollinger, L. (2002) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/82.2.128 · Cited by 2,070
Submaximal Exercise Testing: Clinical Application and Interpretation
Noonan, V., & Dean, E. (2000) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/80.8.782 · Cited by 637
A Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Men and Women
Sparling, P. B. (1980) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1980.10608077 · Cited by 142
Weyand, P. G., Kelly, M., Blackadar, T., Darley, J. C., Oliver, S. R., Ohlenbusch, N. E., Joffe, S. W., & Hoyt, R. W. (2001) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.451 · Cited by 61
Heart-to-Heart: Promoting Walking in Rural Women Through Motivational Interviewing and Group Support
Perry, C. K., Rosenfeld, A. G., Bennett, J. A., & Potempa, K. (2007) · Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/01.jcn.0000278953.67630.e3 · Cited by 59
Accelerometry and Heart Rate as a Measure of Physical Fitness: Proof of Concept
PLASQUI, G., & WESTERTERP, K. R. (2005) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000161805.61893.c0 · Cited by 56
Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols
Haller, J. M., Fehling, P. C., Barr, D. A., Storer, T. W., Cooper, C. B., & Smith, D. L. (2013) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.1002/phy2.124 · Cited by 14
Effects of High-Intensity Warm-Up on 5000-Meter Performance Time in Trained Long-Distance Runners
Alves, M. D. D. J., Knechtle, B., Silva, D. D. S., Fernandes, M. S. D. S., Gomes, J. H., Thuany, M., Aidar, F. J., Weiss, K., & De Souza, R. F. (2023) · Journal of Sports Science and Medicine · doi:10.52082/jssm.2023.254 · Cited by 13
Macuh, M., Kojić, N., & Knap, B. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15173721 · Cited by 9
Ojeda, Á. H., Barahona-Fuentes, G., Galdames Maliqueo, S., Guzmán Solis, M., Cabrera, M. M. Y., & Jorquera-Aguilera, C. (2023) · Journal of the American Nutrition Association · doi:10.1080/07315724.2021.2020183 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, K. H.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1968-01-15
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4292679678
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
