Cited by 382Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesSports injuries and prevention

The Second Impact in Catastrophic Contact-Sports Head Trauma

Saunders, Richard L.·1984·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

CATASTROPHIC brain injury following minor impact has been known to occur in contact sports, particularly football.1This peculiar susceptibility remains unexplained. However, the common resumption of contact play soon after concussion suggests that sequential minor impacts may occasionally lead to major cerebral pathological conditions. If these injuries have a compounding effect rather than representing isolated events, then additional impact to an already compliance-compromised brain might precipitate a catastrophic increase in intracranial pressure, perhaps through loss of vasomotor tone. We report a case documenting a preexisting cerebral contusion and the lethal effect of a second minor impact. This case suggests that clinical examination alone may sometimes be inadequate in evaluating persisting symptoms after minor head injury. In the athlete who has had a cerebral concussion, computed tomographic (CT) scanning may be required before medical clearance to resume play is justified. Report of a Case A 19-year-old, right-handed, college football player

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1984.03350040068030

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Second-impact syndrome occurs when an athlete sustains an initial mild head injury or concussion, then suffers a second head injury before the symptoms associated with the first impact have cleared, with resultant diffuse cerebral swelling and grave deterioration.

    “Second-impact syndrome (SIS) occurs when an athlete sustains an initial mild head injury or concussion, then suffers a second head injury before the symptoms associated with the first impact have cleared, with resultant diffuse cerebral swelling and grave deterioration [19, 20, 113, 133, 137, 164].”

    From The neuropathology of sport (2014) · cites this paper as [164]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saunders, R. L.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Saunders, Richard L.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1984-07-27
Volume
252
Issue
4
Pages
538
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2005040118
Cited by
382
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
Keywords
second impact syndrome, contact sports, football, concussion, cerebral contusion, intracranial pressure, vascular tone, computed tomography, return to sport, medical clearance
MeSH terms
Adult, Athletic Injuries, Brain Concussion, Football, Hematoma, Subdural, Humans, Male, Radiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review