Cited by 326Pain Management and Placebo EffectPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Nocebo effects, patient–clinician communication, and therapeutic outcomes

Open access
Colloca, Luana, Finniss, Damien·2012·JAMA

Abstract

NOCEBO EFFECTS ARE ADVERSE EVENTS PRODUCED by negative expectations and represent the negative side of placebo effects.It is now recognized that nocebo effects exist and operate during routine treatments, negatively affecting clinical outcomes even when placebos are not administered.The nocebo effects and placebo effects are the direct result of the psychosocial context or therapeutic environment on a patient's mind, brain, and body.Both phenomena can be produced by multiple factors, such as verbal suggestions and past experience. 1In the case of nocebo effects, negative information and prior unsuccessful therapies may be particularly important in mediating undesirable outcomes to routine therapy.Therefore, consideration of nocebo effects in the context of patient-clinician communication and disclosure in routine practice may be valuable in both minimizing the nocebo component of a given therapy and improving outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2012.115

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Negative expectations may play a role in producing side effects and adverse events during trials and treatment.

    “Similarly, there is evidence suggesting that negative expectations can contribute to a variety of side effects and adverse events in clinical trials and medical care (Amanzio et al., 2009; Barsky et al., 2002; Colloca and Finniss, 2012; Petersen et al., 2014).”

    From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as Colloca and Finniss, 2012

  • Nocebo hyperalgesia has received less research attention than placebo analgesia.

    “Relatively fewer studies have focused on nocebo hyperalgesia (Benedetti et al., 2003; Colloca and Benedetti, 2007; Colloca and Finniss, 2012; Geuter and Buchel, 2013; Kong et al., 2008; Schmid et al., 2013; Scott et al., 2008).”

    From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as Colloca and Finniss, 2012

  • The duration of prior events marked with exposure to pain is relevant for the development and perpetuation of nocebo-induced algesia.

    “The duration of prior events marked with exposure to pain is also relevant for the development and perpetuation of nocebo-induced algesia.24,26,33–35”
  • Colloca and Benedetti showed that participants who were observing an analgesic effect in another person when a light flashed displayed analgesia when they were exposed to the same light paired with high level of pain.

    “Colloca and Benedetti26 showed that the participants who were observing an analgesic effect in another person when a light flashed, displayed analgesia when they were exposed to the same light paired with high level of pain.”
  • Social learning produced placebo effects of the same magnitude as classical conditioning.

    “Social learning produced placebo effects of the same magnitude as classical conditioning.26”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colloca, L., & Finniss, D.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2012-02-08
Volume
307
Issue
6
Pages
567-8
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2020713670
Cited by
326
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
15.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
nocebo effect, placebo effect, patient-clinician communication, negative expectations, verbal suggestion, adverse drug reactions, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Communication, Humans, Informed Consent, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychophysiology, Placebo Effect, Treatment Outcome, Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review