Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 392

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of the Use and Timing of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Delivery on Left Ventricular Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction: The TIME Randomized Trial

Open access
Traverse, Jay H., Henry, Timothy D., Pepine, Carl J., Willerson, James T., Zhao, David X. M., Ellis, Stephen G., Forder, John R., Anderson, R. David, Hatzopoulos, Antonis K., Penn, Marc S., Perin, Emerson C., Chambers, Jeffrey, Baran, Kenneth W., Raveendran, Ganesh, Lambert, Charles, Lerman, Amir, Simon, Daniel I., Vaughan, Douglas E., Lai, Dejian, Gee, Adrian P., Taylor, Doris A., Cogle, Christopher R., Thomas, James D., Olson, Rachel E., Bowman, Sherry, Francescon, Judy, Geither, Carrie, Handberg, Eileen, Kappenman, Casey, Westbrook, Lynette, Piller, Linda B., Simpson, Lara M., Baraniuk, Sarah, Loghin, Catalin, Aguilar, David, Richman, Sara, Zierold, Claudia, Spoon, Daniel B., Bettencourt, Judy, Sayre, Shelly L., Vojvodic, Rachel W., Skarlatos, Sonia I., Gordon, David J., Ebert, Ray F., Kwak, Minjung, Moyé, Lemuel A., Simari, Robert D.·2012·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: While the delivery of cell therapy after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been evaluated in previous clinical trials, the influence of the timing of cell delivery on the effect on left ventricular function has not been analyzed. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of intracoronary autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMC) delivery after STEMI on recovery of global and regional left ventricular function and whether timing of BMC delivery (3 days vs 7 days after reperfusion) influences this effect. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A randomized, 2 × 2 factorial, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Timing In Myocardial infarction Evaluation (TIME) enrolled 120 patients with left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤ 45%) after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of anterior STEMI between July 17, 2008, and November 15, 2011, as part of the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. INTERVENTIONS: Intracoronary infusion of 150 × 106 BMCs or placebo (randomized 2:1) within 12 hours of aspiration and cell processing administered at day 3 or day 7 (randomized 1:1) after treatment with PCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end points were change in global (LVEF) and regional (wall motion) left ventricular function in infarct and border zones at 6 months measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and change in left ventricular function as affected by timing of treatment on day 3 vs day 7. The secondary end points included major adverse cardiovascular events as well as changes in left ventricular volumes and infarct size. RESULTS: The mean (SD) patient age was 56.9 (10.9) years and 87.5% of participants were male. At 6 months, there was no significant increase in LVEF for the BMC group (45.2% [95% CI, 42.8% to 47.6%] to 48.3% [95% CI, 45.3% to 51.3%) vs the placebo group (44.5% [95% CI, 41.0% to 48.0%] to 47.8% [95% CI, 43.4% to 52.2%]) (P = .96). There was no significant treatment effect on regional left ventricular function observed in either infarct or border zones. There were no significant differences in change in global left ventricular function for patients treated at day 3 (−0.9% [95% CI, −6.6% to 4.9%], P = .76) or day 7 (1.1% [95% CI, −4.7% to 6.9%], P = .70). The timing of treatment had no significant effect on regional left ventricular function recovery. Major adverse events were rare among all treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI, the administration of intracoronary BMCs at either 3 days or 7 days after the event had no significant effect on recovery of global or regional left ventricular function compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00684021.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2012.28726

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 392

Metadata

Authors
Traverse, J. H., Henry, T. D., Pepine, C. J., Willerson, J. T., Zhao, D. X. M., Ellis, S. G., Forder, J. R., Anderson, R. D., Hatzopoulos, A. K., Penn, M. S., Perin, E. C., Chambers, J., Baran, K. W., Raveendran, G., Lambert, C., Lerman, A., Simon, D. I., Vaughan, D. E., Lai, D., Gee, A. P., Taylor, D. A., Cogle, C. R., Thomas, J. D., Olson, R. E., Bowman, S., Francescon, J., Geither, C., Handberg, E., Kappenman, C., Westbrook, L., Piller, L. B., Simpson, L. M., Baraniuk, S., Loghin, C., Aguilar, D., Richman, S., Zierold, C., Spoon, D. B., Bettencourt, J., Sayre, S. L., Vojvodic, R. W., Skarlatos, S. I., Gordon, D. J., Ebert, R. F., Kwak, M., Moyé, L. A., & Simari, R. D.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2012-12-12
Volume
308
Issue
22
Pages
2380-9
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2112214249
Cited by
392
References
0
FWCI
23.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of the Use and Timing of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Delivery on Left Ventricular Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction: The TIME Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2012.28726
The paper
Traverse, J. H., Henry, T. D., Pepine, C. J., Willerson, J. T., Zhao, D. X. M., Ellis, S. G., Forder, J. R., Anderson, R. D., Hatzopoulos, A. K., Penn, M. S., Perin, E. C., Chambers, J., Baran, K. W., Raveendran, G., Lambert, C., Lerman, A., Simon, D. I., Vaughan, D. E., Lai, D., . . . Simari, R. D. (2012). Effect of the Use and Timing of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Delivery on Left Ventricular Function After Acute Myocardial Infarction: The TIME Randomized Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.28726

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.