Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Glioblastoma is the most devastating primary malignancy of the central nervous system in adults. Most patients die within 1 to 2 years of diagnosis. Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are a locoregionally delivered antimitotic treatment that interferes with cell division and organelle assembly. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TTFields used in combination with temozolomide maintenance treatment after chemoradiation therapy for patients with glioblastoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: After completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients with glioblastoma were randomized (2:1) to receive maintenance treatment with either TTFields plus temozolomide (n = 466) or temozolomide alone (n = 229) (median time from diagnosis to randomization, 3.8 months in both groups). The study enrolled 695 of the planned 700 patients between July 2009 and November 2014 at 83 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, and South Korea. The trial was terminated based on the results of this planned interim analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with TTFields was delivered continuously (>18 hours/day) via 4 transducer arrays placed on the shaved scalp and connected to a portable medical device. Temozolomide (150-200 mg/m2/d) was given for 5 days of each 28-day cycle. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population (significance threshold of .01) with overall survival in the per-protocol population (n = 280) as a powered secondary end point (significance threshold of .006). This prespecified interim analysis was to be conducted on the first 315 patients after at least 18 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The interim analysis included 210 patients randomized to TTFields plus temozolomide and 105 randomized to temozolomide alone, and was conducted at a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 18-60 months). Median progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.2 months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.3-5.2 months) in the temozolomide alone group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [98.7% CI, 0.43-0.89]; P = .001). Median overall survival in the per-protocol population was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.7-25.0 months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group (n = 196) and 15.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.1 months) in the temozolomide alone group (n = 84) (HR, 0.64 [99.4% CI, 0.42-0.98]; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this interim analysis of 315 patients with glioblastoma who had completed standard chemoradiation therapy, adding TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In this prespecified interim analysis of the EF-14 trial, adding tumor-treating fields (TTFields) to maintenance temozolomide significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma after chemoradiotherapy. The trial was terminated early based on these interim results.
Key findings
- Among 315 patients in the interim analysis (210 TTFields plus temozolomide; 105 temozolomide alone), median progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.2) vs 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.3-5.2) (HR, 0.62 [98.7% CI, 0.43-0.89]; P = .001).
- Median overall survival in the per-protocol population was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.7-25.0) vs 15.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.1) (HR, 0.64 [99.4% CI, 0.42-0.98]; P = .004). In the intent-to-treat population, median overall survival was 19.6 months vs 16.6 months (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.98]; P = .03), and 2-year survival was 43% vs 29% (P = .006).
- TTFields plus temozolomide was not associated with a significant increase in systemic toxic effects; localized skin toxicity occurred in 43% (mild to moderate) and 2% (grade 3) with TTFields, and seizure incidence was 7% vs 8%.
Methods
- Multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 trial; patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma who were progression-free after chemoradiotherapy were randomized 2:1 to TTFields plus temozolomide or temozolomide alone. The study enrolled 695 of 700 planned patients at 83 centers; this interim analysis included the first 315 patients with at least 18 months of follow-up.
- TTFields were delivered continuously (>18 hours/day) via 4 transducer arrays on the shaved scalp; temozolomide was given at 150-200 mg/m²/d for 5 days every 28 days.
- Primary end point was progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population (significance threshold .01); overall survival in the per-protocol population was a powered secondary end point (significance threshold .006). Analyses used stratified log-rank tests, with central blinded MRI review.
Limitations
- The paper states that enrollment occurred only after radiochemotherapy, leading to variation in standard treatment delivery and exclusion of patients who progressed early during radiochemotherapy; there is likely reporting bias for second-line therapies because TTFields were continued in the intervention group.
- The paper states this is a planned interim analysis of the first 315 patients, and mature data from the full data set are needed for detailed subgroup analyses.
- The paper states the trial was open-label and no sham or placebo control was used; it argues objective end points assessed by blinded review are independent of placebo effects, but the open-label design remains a stated limitation. Funding and author conflicts with Novocure are also evident in the text.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 22 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
A total of 12 patients died of causes considered unrelated to treatment while receiving adjuvant therapy (8 [3.9%] in the temozolomide plus TTFields group and 4 [4.0%] in the temozolomide alone group).
“A total of 12 patients died of causes considered unrelated to treatment while receiving adjuvant therapy (8 [3.9%] in the temozolomide plus TTFields group and 4 [4.0%] in the temozolomide alone group; Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Patients who received TTFields plus temozolomide had a median overall survival of 20.5 months compared with 15.6 months in those who received temozolomide alone (per-protocol analysis; ITT analysis did not differ substantially).
“Patients who received TTFields plus temozolomide had a median overall survival of 20.5 months compared with 15.6 months in those who received temozolomide alone (as per the prespecifed per-protocol analysis; the ITT analysis did not differ substantially).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In additional analyses in the ITT population, the median overall survival was 19.6 months (95% CI, 16.6-24.4 months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group compared with 16.6 months (95% CI, 13.6-19.2 months) in the temozolomide alone group (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.98]; stratified log-rank P = .03).
“In additional analyses in the ITT population, the median overall survival was 19.6 months (95% CI, 16.6-24.4months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group compared with 16.6 months (95% CI, 13.6-19.2months) in the temozolomide alone group (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.98];stratified log-rank P = .03;Figure 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The incidence of seizures was almost identical in the 2 groups (15 [7%] in the TTFields plus temozolomide group vs 8 [8%] in temozolomide alone group).
“The incidence of seizures was almost identical in the 2 groups (15 [7%] in the TTFields plus temozolomide group vs 8 [8%] in temozolomide alone group).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two-thirds (n = 141) of patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group continued treatment with TTFields after first tumor progression.
“Two-thirds (n = 141) of patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group continued treatment with TTFields after first tumor progression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Median overall survival in the per-protocol population was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.7-25.0 months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group (n = 196) and 15.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.1 months) in the temozolomide alone group (n = 84) (HR, 0.64 [99.4% CI, 0.42-0.98]; P = .004).
“Median overall survival in the per-protocol population was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.7-25.0months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group (n = 196) and 15.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.1 months) in the temozolomide alone group (n = 84) (HR, 0.64 [99.4% CI, 0.42-0.98];P = .004).”
- Also stated in: § Efficacy End Points · plain
“Median overall survival in the per-protocol population was 20.5 months (95% CI, 16.7-25.0months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group (n = 196) compared with 15.6 months (95% CI, 13.3-19.1 months) in the temozolomide alone group (n = 84) (HR, 0.64 [99.4% CI, 0.42-0.98];stratified log-rank P = .004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Efficacy End Points · plain
- Findingown data
The prespecified analysis for overall survival in the interim analysis met the prespecified threshold for efficacy in the per-protocol population.
“This analysis met the prespecified threshold for efficacy in the interim analysis for the per-protocol population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In a more conservative analysis using the ITT population, an overall survival benefit was also manifest.
“In a more conserva-tive analysis using the ITT population, an overall survival benefit was also manifest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Almost half of the patients treated with TTFields did experience some grade 1 to 2 (mild to moderate) localized skin reaction related to the application of the transducer arrays used to deliver the TTFields.
“Almost half of the patients treated with TTFields did experience some grade 1 to 2 (mild to moderate) localized skin reaction related to the application of the transducer arrays used to deliver the TTFields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The percentage of patients alive at 2 years following enrollment was 43% in the TTFields plus temozolomide group and 29% in the temozolomide alone group (P = .006).
“The percentage of patients alive at 2 years following enrollment was 43% in the TTFields plus temozolomide group and 29% in the temozolomide alone group (P = .006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the prespecified ITT analysis, patients randomized to TTFields plus temozolomide had a median progression-free survival of 7.1 months vs 4.0 months for temozolomide alone.
“The prespecified analyses revealed that patients randomized to receive TTFields plus temozolomide compared with patients randomized to receive temozolomide alone had a median progression-free survival of 7.1 months vs 4.0 months (ITT analyses).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only 2% of patients receiving TTFields had grade 3 to 4 (severe) skin reactions beneath the transducer arrays.
“Only 2% of patients receiving TTFields had grade 3 to 4 (severe) skin reactions beneath the transducer arrays.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The overall incidence, distribution, and severity of adverse events were similar in patients treated with TTFields plus temozolomide and in those treated with temozolomide alone.
“The overall incidence, distribution, and severity of adverse events were similar in patients treated with TTFields plus temozolomide and in those treated with temozolomide alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The addition of TTFields to temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma was not associated with any significant increase in systemic toxic effects compared with temozolomide therapy alone.
“The addition of TTFields to temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma was not associated with any significant increase in systemic toxic effects compared with temozolomide therapy alone (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The only notable exception was a higher incidence rate of localized skin toxicity (medical device site reaction beneath the transducer arrays) in patients treated with TTFields plus temozolomide.
“The only notable exception was a higher incidence rate of localized skin toxicity (medical device site reaction beneath the transducer arrays) in patients treated with TTFields plus temozolomide.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
During the last decade, all attempts to improve the outcome for patients with glioblastoma have failed when evaluated in large randomized trials.
“During the last decade, all attempts to improve the outcome for patients with glioblastoma have failed when evaluated in large randomized trials.[2][3][4]6,7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [2]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Standard treatment for glioblastoma consists of maximal safe surgical resection or diagnostic biopsy, followed by radiotherapy (60 Gy) with concomitant daily temozolomide, and then maintenance temozolomide for 6 to 12 months.
“Standard treatment consists of maximal safe surgical resection or a diagnostic biopsy, followed by radiotherapy (60 Gy) with concomitant daily temozolomide chemotherapy, and then maintenance treatment with temozolomide for 6 to 12 months.1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Patients with glioblastoma were randomized (2:1) to receive maintenance treatment with either TTFields plus temozolomide (n = 466) or temozolomide alone (n = 229).
“patients with glioblastoma were randomized (2:1) to receive maintenance treatment with either TTFields plus temozolomide (n = 466) or temozolomide alone (n = 229)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In preclinical models, TTFields cause mitotic arrest and apoptosis by disrupting mitotic spindle formation during metaphase and causing dielectrophoretic movement of polar molecules during cytokinesis.
“In preclinical models, TTFields have been shown to cause mitotic arrest and apoptosis by disrupting mitotic spindle formation during metaphase and causing dielectrophoretic movement of polar molecules during cytokinesis.8,[10][11][12]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A sham or placebo treatment for the control group was considered neither practical nor appropriate.
“A sham or placebo treatment for the control group was considered neither practical (patients would be able to sense heat when they were receiving TTFields) nor appropriate (due to the burden for patients and caregivers and the need to shave the scalp and have transducer arrays placed).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The benefit observed with TTFields cannot be simply attributed to patient selection.
“Thus, the benefit observed with TTFields cannot be simply attributed to patient selection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The magnitude of effect size seen in the present trial (HR of 0.62 for progression-free survival and 0.74 for overall survival) is beyond what could be attributed to a placebo effect.
“The magnitude of effect size seen in the present trial (HR of 0.62 for progression-free survival and 0.74 for overall survival) is beyond what could be attributed to a placebo effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The observed benefit is in the range of benefit that is considered clinically meaningful for therapeutic agents in oncology.
“is in the range of benefit that is considered clinically meaningful for therapeutic agents in oncology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Objective end points, such as overall and progression-free survival (assessed by a blinded review panel), are independent of placebo effects in cancer therapy.
“Although some effect of placebo may be expected on subjective end points, such as cognitive function and quality of life, objective end points, such as overall and progression-free survival (assessed by a blinded review panel), are independent of pla-cebo effects in cancer therapy.24”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductcitation
The final type I error rate of 0.05 was split between the interim and final analyses based on a standard α spending function.
“The final type I error rate of 0.05 was split between the interim and final analyses based on a standard α spending function.[20][21][22]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [20]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22]
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Between July 2009 and November 2014, there were 695 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma randomized to receive either TTFields plus temozolomide (n = 466) or temozolomide alone (n = 229).
“Between July 2009 and November 2014, there were 695 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma randomized to receive either TTFields plus temozolomide (n = 466) or temozolomide alone (n = 229).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Secondary imputation analyses of progression-free survival with relation to the effects of interval and informational censoring did not change the conclusions of the primary progression-free survival analysis.
“Secondary imputation analyses of progression-free survival with relation to the effects of interval and informational censoring did not change the conclusions of the primary progression-free survival analysis (eAppendix 3 in Supplement 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
An analysis of robustness performed on all randomized patients enrolled at the time of study termination supports the conclusions of the interim analysis.
“Furthermore, an analysis of robustness performed on all randomized patients enrolled at the time of study termination (eAppendix 1 in Supplement 2) supports the conclusions of the interim analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The RTOG 0525 protocol randomized patients only after the end of treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy, similar to our study.
“The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0525 protocol randomized patients only after the end of treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy, similar to our study.3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3]
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
Medical follow-up with monthly visits was the same for both treatment groups.
“Medical follow-up with monthly visits was the same for both treatment groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The type of chemotherapy used at recurrence was balanced between treatment groups.
“The type of chemotherapy used at recurrence was balanced between treatment groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A robustness analysis including all 695 patients enrolled in the trial served to validate the findings of the interim analysis.
“Furthermore, a robustness analysis including all 695 patients enrolled in the trial served to validate the findings of the interim analysis (database lock: December 29, 2014; eAppendix 1 in Supplement 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Three-quarters (n = 157) of patients receiving treatment with TTFields were adherent to therapy (ie, wearing the device >18 hours per day on average during the first 3 treatment months).
“Three-quarters (n = 157) of patients receiving treatment with TTFields were adherent to therapy (ie, wearing the device >18 hours per day on average during the first 3 treatment months).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Patient baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups.
“Patient baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
This was an open-labeled study.
“This was an open-labeled study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 26
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMedian progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.2 months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.3-5.2 months) in the temozolomide alone group (HR, 0.62 [98.7% CI, 0.43-0.89]; P = .001).
“Median progression-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.2months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.3-5.2months) in the temozolomide alone group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [98.7% CI, 0.43-0.89];P = .001).”
- Also stated in: § Efficacy End Points · plain
“the median progressionfree survival from randomization was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.2months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group compared with 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.3-5.2months) in the temozolomide alone group (HR, 0.62 [98.7% CI, 0.43-0.89];stratified log-rank P = .001;Figure 2A)”
- Also stated in: § Efficacy End Points · plain
“Thus, adding TTFields to temozolomide treatment increased median progressionfree survival in the ITT population by 3.1 months.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Efficacy End Points · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo increase in seizure rate or neurological adverse events was observed.
“No increase in seizure rate or neurological adverse events was observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSecond-line treatments, such as nitrosoureas, temozolomide rechallenge, and bevacizumab, were received by 67% of the patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group compared with 57% in the temozolomide alone group; about 40% of second-line therapies included bevacizumab and about 40% included nitrosoureas.
“Second-line treatments, such as nitrosoureas, temozolomide rechallenge, and bevacizumab, were received by 67% of the patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group compared with 57% in the temozolomide alone group; about 40% of second-line therapies included bevacizumab and about 40% included nitrosoureas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningBecause TTFields were applied only to the head, an increase in systemic adverse events was neither seen nor expected.
“Because TTFields were applied only to the head, an increase in systemic adverse events was neither seen nor expected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the ITT population, TTFields plus temozolomide produced a gain of 3 months in median progression-free survival (from 4.0 to 7.2 months; HR, 0.62) and median overall survival (from 16.6 to 19.6 months; HR, 0.74), and a 2-year survival gain of 14% (from 29% to 43%).
“In the present trial, the gain of 3 months in both median progression-free survival (from 4.0 months to 7.2 months; HR, 0.62) and median overall survival (from 16.6 months to 19.6 months; HR, 0.74), translating into a survival gain at 2 years of 14% (from 29% to 43%) in the ITT population”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe independent data and safety monitoring committee met in October 2014 to review the interim analysis; the trial met the predefined boundaries for success (improvement of both progression-free and overall survival) and the committee recommended study termination, thus allowing patients in the control group to crossover and receive TTFields.
“The independent data and safety monitoring committee met in October 2014 to review the interim analysis; the trial met the predefined boundaries for success (improvement of both progression-free and overall survival) and the committee recommended study termination, thus allowing patients in the control group to crossover and receive TTFields.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEight patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group (4%) compared with 6 patients in the temozolomide alone group (3%) were considered stable by blinded central review; however, treatment had been changed by the study investigator due to local interpretation of tumor progression.
“Eight patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group (4%) compared with 6 patients in the temozolomide alone group (3%) were considered stable by blinded central review; however, treatment had been changed by the study investigator due to local interpretation of tumor progression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe median number of temozolomide cycles until evidence of first tumor progression was 6 cycles (range, 1-26 cycles) for patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group and 4.0 cycles (range, 1-24 cycles) for patients in the temozolomide alone group.
“The median number of temozolomide cycles until evidence of first tumor progression was 6 cycles (range, 1-26 cycles) for patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group and 4.0 cycles (range, 1-24 cycles) for patients in the temozolomide alone group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAt the time of this report, 35 patients in the control group crossed over to receive TTFields.
“At the time of this report, 35 patients in the control group crossed over to receive TTFields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe median duration of treatment with TTFields was 9 months (range, 1-58 months).
“the median duration of treatment with TTFields was 9 months (range, 1-58 months).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMild anxiety, confusion, insomnia, and headaches were reported more frequently in the patients treated with TTFields plus temozolomide and occurred mainly at the time of therapy initiation.
“Mild anxiety, confusion, insomnia, and headaches were reported more frequently in the patients treated with TTFields plus temozolomide and occurred mainly at the time of therapy initiation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe addition of TTFields to standard maintenance temozolomide significantly improved progression-free and overall survival.
“the addition of TTFields to standard maintenance temozolomide significantly improved progression-free and overall survival.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“adding TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe control groups with standard dose temozolomide only in the present study and the RTOG 0525 trial were comparable: progression-free survival from randomization of 4.0 months in the present study and 5.5 months in the RTOG 0525 trial and overall survival of 16.6 months in both trials.
“The control groups with standard dose temozolomide only in these 2 trials were comparable: progression-free survival from randomization of 4.0 months in the present study and 5.5 months in the RTOG 0525 trial and overall survival of 16.6 months in both trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMild to moderate skin irritation was observed in 43% of patients treated with TTFields plus temozolomide and severe skin reaction (grade 3) in 2%.
“Mild to moderate skin irritation was observed in 43% of patients treated with TTFields plus temozolomide and severe skin reaction (grade 3) in 2%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study enrolled 695 of the planned 700 patients between July 2009 and November 2014 at 83 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, and South Korea.
“The study enrolled 695 of the planned 700 patients between July 2009 and November 2014 at 83 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, Israel, and South Korea.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThis prespecified interim analysis was to be conducted on the first 315 patients after at least 18 months of follow-up.
“This prespecified interim analysis was to be conducted on the first 315 patients after at least 18 months of follow-up.”
- Also stated in: § Statistical Considerations · plain
“This prespecified interim analysis was to be performed after the first 315 randomized patients reached a minimum 18-month follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Statistical Considerations · plain
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe interim analysis included 210 patients randomized to TTFields plus temozolomide and 105 randomized to temozolomide alone, and was conducted at a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 18-60 months).
“The interim analysis included 210 patients randomized to TTFields plus temozolomide and 105 randomized to temozolomide alone, and was conducted at a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 18-60 months).”
- Also stated in: § Study Participants · plain
“Data for the interim analysis included 210 patients randomized to TTFields plus temozolomide and 105 to temozolomide alone”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Study Participants · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTumor-treating fields (TTFields) are an antimitotic treatment that selectively disrupts the division of cells by delivering low-intensity, intermediate-frequency (200 kHz) alternating electric fields via transducer arrays applied to the shaved scalp.
“Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are a locoregionally delivered antimitotic treatment that interferes with cell division and organelle assembly.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are an antimitotic treatment that selectively disrupts the division of cells by delivering low-intensity, intermediate-frequency (200 kHz) alternating electric fields via transducer arrays applied to the shaved scalp.[8][9][10]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8][9][10]
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that trial, TTFields were associated with better quality of life without the typical chemotherapy-associated toxic effects.
“but the therapy was associated with better quality of life without the typical chemotherapy-associated toxic effects.13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe trial was terminated based on the results of this planned interim analysis.
“The trial was terminated based on the results of this planned interim analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent randomized studies of patients with glioblastoma, which did not use placebo controls, failed to show any increase in progression-free or overall survival despite intensive treatment regimens requiring twice weekly hospital visits.
“Recent randomized studies of patients with glioblastoma, which did not use placebo controls, failed to show any increase in progression-free or overall survival 3,7 despite intensive treatment regimens requiring twice weekly hospital visits.7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was also designed to have 80% power (HR, 0.76; 2-sided α level of .05) to examine overall survival as a secondary end point.
“The study was also designed to have 80% power (HR, 0.76; 2-sided α level of .05) to examine overall survival as a secondary end point.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe trial population and the results in the control group in this study were comparable with other glioblastoma clinical trials.
“The trial population and the results in the control group in this study were comparable with other glioblastoma clinical trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPatient characteristics of all patients randomized did not differ significantly from the interim data set, and the results for the main end points were similar in these analyses compared with the interim analysis.
“Patient characteristics of all patients randomized did not differ significantly from the interim data set, and the results for the main end points were similar in these analyses compared with the interim analysis (eAppendix 1 in Supplement 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe support provided to patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group by device support specialists during the trial was largely technical in nature and did not include medical supportive care.
“In addition, the support provided to patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group by device support specialists during the trial was largely technical in nature and did not include medical supportive care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataEvaluation of MGMT gene promoter methylation status was performed by a central laboratory blinded to treatment group.
“evaluation of MGMT gene promoter methylation status was performed as described previously 7,15,16 by a central laboratory blinded to treatment group (MDxHealth).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAn independent data and safety monitoring committee was chartered to stop the trial if the interim analysis of progression-free survival (ITT population) and overall survival (per-protocol population) surpassed these predetermined thresholds, as well as for futility or safety concerns.
“An independent data and safety monitoring committee was chartered to stop the trial if the interim analysis of progression-free survival (ITT population) and overall survival (per-protocol population) surpassed these predetermined thresholds, as well as for futility or safety concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThere is likely reporting bias for second-line therapies after tumor progression because in the TTFields plus temozolomide group, TTFields were to be continued, and thus, more detailed treatment information has been tracked for this group.
“There is likely reporting bias for second-line therapies after tumor progression because in the TTFields plus temozolomide group, TTFields were to be continued, and thus, more detailed treatment information has been tracked for this group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataMultiple imputation analyses were performed for the trial's primary end point of progression-free survival in the ITT population to test the sensitivity of the results to possible bias using informative and interval censoring.
“Multiple imputation analyses also were performed for the trial's primary end point of progression-free survival in the ITT population to test the sensitivity of the results to possible bias using informative and interval censoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen the interval from diagnosis to randomization is added to the outcome results in this study, the progression-free survival of 7.8 months in the control group is comparable with most other reported studies, and supports the generalizability of these results.
“When the interval from diagnosis to randomization is added to the outcome results in this study, the progressionfree survival of 7.8 months in the control group is comparable with most other reported studies, and supports the generalizability of these results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Most glioblastoma trials report survival from the date of initial diagnosis or study enrollment before starting radiochemotherapy, about 3 to 4 months before randomization in the current study.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn this interim analysis of 315 patients with glioblastoma who had completed standard chemoradiation therapy, adding TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival.
“In this interim analysis of 315 patients with glioblastoma who had completed standard chemoradiation therapy, adding TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free and overall survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe protocol prespecified that overall survival would be analyzed in an as-treated population, excluding all patients in both treatment groups who (1) never started maintenance temozolomide, (2) had major protocol violations, (3) crossed over to the other treatment group, or (4) received TTFields outside the protocol setting.
“The protocol prespecified that overall survival would be analyzed in an as-treated population, excluding all patients in both treatment groups who (1) never started maintenance temozolomide, (2) had major protocol violations, (3) crossed over to the other treatment group, or (4) received TTFields outside the protocol setting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe panel did not have information on treatment received and no stigmata of TTFields array pads were evident on MRI.
“The panel did not have information on treatment received and no stigmata of TTFields array pads were evident on MRI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIn cases of disagreement between central reviewers, a third blinded radiologist adjudicated.
“In cases in which the central reviewers were not in agreement, a third blinded radiologist adjudicated between them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo avoid an increase in the risk of a false-positive result, overall survival was to be tested statistically only if the primary end point was met.
“To avoid an increase in the risk of a falsepositive result, overall survival was to be tested statistically only if the primary end point was met.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe primary end point would be achieved in the interim analysis if progression-free survival in the ITT population was significantly longer in the intervention group compared with the control group using a stratified log-rank test with an α level of .01.
“The primary end point would be achieved in the interim analysis if progression-free survival in the ITT population was significantly longer in the intervention group compared with the control group using a stratified log-rank test with an α level of .01.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataRandomization was performed through a central web-based randomization system and was stratified by extent of resection and by MGMT methylation status.
“Randomization was performed through a central web-based randomization system and was stratified by extent of resection (biopsy, partial resection, gross total resection) and by O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status (methylated, unmethylated, or unknown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningPatients in this trial were randomized only after the end of radiochemotherapy, and for most, the first cycle of maintenance temozolomide had been started at randomization; thus, patients with early tumor progression during radiochemotherapy were excluded.
“Nevertheless, patients in this trial were randomized only after the end of radiochemotherapy, and for most, the first cycle of maintenance temozolomide had been started at the time of randomization; thus, patients with early tumor progression during radiochemotherapy were excluded.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationAll MRIs were reviewed centrally by 2 blinded independent radiologists and evaluated for tumor response and progression using Macdonald criteria.
“All MRIs were reviewed centrally by 2 blinded independent radiologists (BioClinica Inc) and were evaluated for tumor response and progression using the criteria developed by Macdonald et al. 19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Macdonald et al. 19
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe results of the central review were not communicated to the study investigator, and all treatment decisions were based on local imaging interpretation.
“The results of the central review were not communicated to the study investigator, and all treatment decisions were based on local imaging interpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis adverse effect could be managed using published skin care guidelines for patients receiving TTFields.
“This adverse effect could be managed using published skin care guidelines for patients receiving TTFields.25”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe secondary end point would be achieved in the interim analysis if overall survival in the as-treated population (per-protocol population) was significantly longer in the TTFields plus temozolomide group using a stratified log-rank test with an α level of .006.
“The secondary end point would be achieved in the interim analysis if overall survival in the as-treated population (per-protocol population) was significantly longer in the TTFields plus temozolomide group using a stratified log-rank test with an α level of .006.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Most glioblastoma trials report survival from the date of initial diagnosis or study enrollment before starting radiochemotherapy, about 3 to 4 months before randomization in the current study.
“Most glioblastoma trials have reported survival from the date of initial diagnosis or study enrollment before starting radiochemotherapy, thus 3 to 4 months before randomization of the current study.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In newly diagnosed glioblastoma, 200 kHz TTFields combined with adjuvant temozolomide prolonged median overall survival by 4.9 months and median progression-free survival by 2.7 months compared with adjuvant temozolomide alone.
“Based on the results of a phase III clinical trial that showed 200 kHz TTFields in combination with adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy prolonged the median overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed GBM patients by 4.9 months (and prolonged median progression-free survival [PFS] by 2.7 months) compared to adjuvant temozolomide alone”
From Permeabilizing Cell Membranes with Electric Fields (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
TTFields have been demonstrated to prolong progression-free survival and overall survival when administered together with standard maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
“It has been evaluated in randomized phase 3 trials in glioblastoma (GBM) and demonstrated to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when administered together with standard maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed GBM.”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, median overall survival from randomization (intent-to-treat) was 19.6 months (95% CI 16.6-24.4) in the TTFields plus TMZ group compared with 16.6 months (95% CI 13.6-19.2) in the TMZ control group (HR 0.74 [95% CI 0.56-0.98]; P=.03).
“Median OS from randomization (ITT) was 19.6 months (95% CI, 16.6–24.4 mo) in the TTFields plus TMZ group compared with 16.6 months (95% CI, 13.6–19.2 mo) in the TMZ control group (HR: 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56–0.98]; P =.03).”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, a blinded central imaging and disease assessment review determined the date of progression.
“All treatment-related clinical decisions were based on local interpretation of imaging; however, a blinded central imaging and disease assessment review determined the date of progression.”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
Preliminary subgroup analyses in EF-14 showed that the positive effect on progression-free and overall survival by the addition of TTFields was not restricted to any subgroup: neither age, performance status, MGMT methylation status nor extent of resection was predictive for a better treatment effect.
“Preliminary subgroup analyses showed that the positive effect observed on PFS and OS by the addition of TTFields was not restricted to any subgroup of patients: in particular neither age, performance status, MGMT methylation status nor extent of resection was predictive for a better treatment effect.”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, the intent-to-treat median progression-free survival was increased by 3.1 months in the TTFields group with a median PFS of 7.1 months (95% CI 5.9-8.2) compared with 4.0 months (95% CI 3.3-5.2) in the control group (HR 0.62 [98.7% CI 0.43-0.89]; P=.001).
“In the interim analysis, the ITT median PFS was increased by 3.1 months in the TTFields group with a median PFS of 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9–8.2 mo) compared with 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.3–5.2 mo) in the control group (HR, 0.62 [98.7% CI, 0.43–0.89]; P=.001).”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, the percentage of patients alive at 2 years following enrollment was 43% in the TTFields/TMZ group and 29% in the TMZ alone group (P=.006).
“The percentage of patients alive at 2 years following enrollment was 43% in the TTFields/TMZ group and 29% in the TMZ alone group (P=.006)17”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, the baseline patient characteristics were well balanced between the two groups.
“The baseline patient characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups.”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, three-quarters of patients receiving TTFields were adherent to therapy as prescribed, wearing the device at least 18 hours per day on average during the first 3 treatment months (n=157/210).
“Three-quarters of patients receiving treatment with TTFields were adherent to therapy as prescribed (ie, wearing the device ≥ 18 hours per day on average during the first 3 treatment months) (n=157/210).”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, at a prespecified interim and futility analysis, a significant improvement in progression-free and overall survival was seen; the independent data monitoring committee recommended early termination for success and allowed crossover to the TTFields arm.
“At a prespecified interim and futility analysis to be performed once the first 315 randomized patients reached a minimum follow-up of 18 months, a significant improvement in progression-free and overall survival was seen; consequently the independent data monitoring committee recommended that the trial be terminated early for success and that patients be allowed to cross over to the TTFields arm.”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
The best results with TTFields have been achieved when TTFields were administered early in the disease course in combination with standard maintenance TMZ therapy.
“The best results with this novel treatment modality have been achieved when TTFields were administered early in the disease course in combination with standard maintenance TMZ therapy,17 similar to that shown 10 years ago when TMZ was added to standard radiotherapy.”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
The results of the randomized phase III EF-14 trial provide level 1 evidence that alternating electric fields are able to positively impact tumor growth and significantly extend survival in glioblastoma.
“The results of the randomized phase III EF-14 trial provide level 1 evidence that alternating electric fields are able to positively impact tumor growth and significantly extend survival in GBM.”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In newly diagnosed glioblastoma, TTFields administered as part of initial treatment showed a consistent prolongation of both progression-free survival and overall survival, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.98).
“However, TTFields when administered as part of the initial treatment in newly diagnosed patients showed a consistent prolongation of both PFS and OS (hazard ratio for death HR: 0.74 (95% CI, 0.56–0.98).”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, before publication of the interim analysis, the overall dataset of 695 randomized patients was statistically scrutinized, and it was concluded that the results are unlikely to change substantially once the whole dataset reaches a mature follow-up.
“Before publication of the interim analysis, the overall dataset of 695 randomized patients was statistically scrutinized. It was concluded that the results are unlikely to change substantially once the whole dataset reaches a mature follow-up (see supplemental material, reference17).”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, due to 2:1 randomization, the control arm comprised only 105 patients, which limited the ability to perform formal subgroup analyses.
“Due to the 2:1 randomization, the control arm comprised only 105 patients, which limited the ability to perform formal subgroup analyses.”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
In the EF-14 trial, grades 1 and 2 skin reactions were reported in 43% of patients, and severe (grade 3) reactions were seen in only 2% of patients.
“In the EF-14 trial for newly diagnosed GBM patients, where the treatment exposure was longer than that for recurrent disease, grades 1 and 2 skin reactions were reported in 43% of patients. Severe (grade 3) reactions were again seen in only 2% of patients.”
From Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors (2016) · cites this paper as [17]
TTFields are clinically applied to disrupt cell division, primarily for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme.
“TTFields are clinically applied to disrupt cell division, primarily for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).”
From An Overview of Sub-Cellular Mechanisms Involved in the Action of TTFields (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
TTFields were approved by the FDA in 2011 for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and in late 2015 for newly diagnosed GBM in combination therapy with temozolomide.
“TTFields have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011 for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)”
From An Overview of Sub-Cellular Mechanisms Involved in the Action of TTFields (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
TTFields has been shown to prolong median survival by 5 months in glioblastoma patients on maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy.
“Most recently, TTFields has been shown to prolong median survival (by 5 months) of glioblastoma patients on maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy2,9.”
From Tumor treating fields increases membrane permeability in glioblastoma cells (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
MGMT invalid-test subgroup counts do not match the total
MinorThe treatment-group counts of invalid MGMT tests sum to 35, not the reported all-patients total of 36.
Reported 36 · recomputed 35
“| Invalid test result | 36 (16) | 24 (16) | 11 (15) |”
Six control-group patients are labeled 3% rather than about 6%
MinorThe interim control group comprised 105 patients. Six of 105 is 5.7%, not the reported 3%.
Reported 3 · recomputed 5.714286
“Eight patients in the TTFields plus temozolomide group (4%) compared with 6 patients in the temozolomide alone group (3%)”
Discussion changes the TTFields median progression-free survival
MinorThe efficacy results give the TTFields-group median as 7.1 months, whereas the discussion describes the same comparison as 7.2 months.
“In the present trial, the gain of 3 months in both median progression-free survival (from 4.0 months to 7.2 months; HR, 0.62)”
“the median progressionfree survival from randomization was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.9-8.2months) in the TTFields plus temozolomide group compared with 4.0 months”
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., Belanger, K., Brandes, A. A., Marosi, C., Bogdahn, U., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043330 · Cited by 21,807 · see citing works
Self-citationAaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005 · see citing works
The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System
Louis, D. N., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O. D., Cavenee, W. K., Burger, P. C., Jouvet, A., Scheithauer, B. W., & Kleihues, P. (2007) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 · Cited by 15,422 · see citing works
Stupp, R., Hegi, M. E., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., TAPHOORN, M. J. B., Janzer, R. C., Ludwin, S. K., Allgeier, A., Fisher, B., Bélanger, K., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70025-7 · Cited by 7,667 · see citing works
Self-citation<i>MGMT</i> Gene Silencing and Benefit from Temozolomide in Glioblastoma
Hegi, M. E., Diserens, A.-C., Gorlia, T., Hamou, M.-F., de Tribolet, N., Weller, M., Kros, J. M., Hainfellner, J. A., Mason, W., Mariani, L., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043331 · Cited by 7,405 · see citing works
Self-citationErratum to: The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system
Louis, D. N., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O. D., Cavenee, W. K., Burger, P. C., Jouvet, A., Scheithauer, B. W., & Kleihues, P. (2007) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-156115 · Cited by 4,435 · see citing works
A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical Trials
O'Brien, P. C., & Fleming, T. R. (1979) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530245 · Cited by 3,311 · see citing works
A Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Gilbert, M. R., Dignam, J. J., Armstrong, T. S., Wefel, J. S., Blumenthal, D. T., Vogelbaum, M. A., Colman, H., Chakravarti, A., Pugh, S., Won, M., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1308573 · Cited by 2,834 · see citing works
Bevacizumab plus Radiotherapy–Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
Chinot, O. L., Wick, W., Mason, W. P., Henriksson, R., Saran, F. H., Nishikawa, R., Carpentier, A. F., Hoang‐Xuan, K., Kavan, P., Cernea, D. M., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1308345 · Cited by 2,565 · see citing works
Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.
Macdonald, D. R., Cascino, T. L., Schold, S. C., & Cairncross, J. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.7.1277 · Cited by 2,409 · see citing works
Dose-Dense Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial
Gilbert, M. R., Wang, M., Aldape, K. D., Stupp, R., Hegi, M. E., Jaeckle, K. A., Armstrong, T. S., Wefel, J. S., Won, M., Blumenthal, D. T., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.49.6968 · Cited by 1,063 · see citing works
Self-citationStupp, R., Hegi, M. E., Gorlia, T., Erridge, S. C., Perry, J., Hong, Y.-K., Aldape, K. D., Lhermitte, B., Pietsch, T., Grujicic, D., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70379-1 · Cited by 1,052 · see citing works
Self-citationAlternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors
Kirson, E. D., Dbalý, V., Tovaryš, F., Vymazal, J., Soustiel, J. F., Itzhaki, A., Mordechovich, D., Steinberg-Shapira, S., Gurvich, Z., Schneiderman, R., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702916104 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Self-citationStupp, R., Wong, E. T., Kanner, A. A., Steinberg, D., Engelhard, H., Heidecke, V., Kirson, E. D., Taillibert, S., Liebermann, F., Dbalý, V., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.011 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
Self-citationDisruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields
Kirson, E. D., Gurvich, Z., Schneiderman, R., Dekel, E., Itzhaki, A., Wasserman, Y., Schatzberger, R., & Palti, Y. (2004) · Cancer research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0083 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Self-citationInterim analysis: The alpha spending function approach
DeMets, D. L., & Lan, K. K. G. (1994) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780131308 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
MGMT Gene Silencing and Benefit From Temozolomide in Glioblastoma
Verma, A. (2006) · Yearbook of Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/s0513-5117(08)70328-4 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
TAPHOORN, M. J. B., Claassens, L., Aaronson, N. K., Coens, C., Mauer, M. E. L., Osoba, D., Stupp, R., Mirimanoff, R. O., van den Bent, M. J., & Bottomley, A. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.01.012 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Self-citationArmah, H. B. (2010) · Yearbook of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s1077-9108(09)79430-7 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Kirson, E. D., Schneiderman, R. S., Dbalý, V., Tovaryš, F., Vymazal, J., Itzhaki, A., Mordechovich, D., Gurvich, Z., Shmueli, E., Goldsher, D., et al. (2009) · BMC Medical Physics · doi:10.1186/1756-6649-9-1 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationWestphal, M., Heese, O., Steinbach, J. P., Schnell, O., Schackert, G., Mehdorn, H. M., Schulz, D., Simon, M., Schlegel, U. S., Senft, C., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.019 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Vlassenbroeck, I., Califice, S., Diserens, A., Migliavacca, E., Straub, J., Stefano, I. D., Moreau, F., Hamou, M., Renard, I., Delorenzi, M., et al. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070169 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationChvetzoff, G., & Tannock, I. F. (2003) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/95.1.19 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Lacouture, M. E., Davis, M. E., Elzinga, G., Butowski, N. A., Tran, D. D., Villano, J. L., DiMeglio, L., Davies, A. M., & Wong, E. T. (2014) · Seminars in Oncology · doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.03.011 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationNovoTTF-100A: a new treatment modality for recurrent glioblastoma
Fonkem, E., & Wong, E. T. (2012) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.12.80 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
The alpha spending function approach to interim data analyses
DeMets, D. L., & Lan, G. (1995) · Cancer Treatment and Research · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-2009-2_1 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Gutin, P. H., & Wong, E. T. (2012) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.14694/edbook_am.2012.32.122 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stupp, R., Taillibert, S., Kanner, A., Read, W., Steinberg, D. M., Lhermitte, B., Toms, S., Idbaih, A., Ahluwalia, M. S., Fink, K., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18718 · Cited by 2,644 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvances in the molecular genetics of gliomas — implications for classification and therapy
Reifenberger, G., Wirsching, H.-G., Knobbe-Thomsen, C. B., & Weller, M. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.204 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Tumor-Treating Fields: A Fourth Modality in Cancer Treatment
Mun, E. J., Babiker, H. M., Weinberg, U., Kirson, E. D., & Von Hoff, D. D. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1117 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Self-citation5-ALA and FDA Approval for Glioma Surgery
Hadjipanayis, C. G., & Stummer, W. (2019) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-019-03098-y · Cited by 338 · see citing works
5‐ALA in the management of malignant glioma
Stepp, H., & Stummer, W. (2018) · Lasers in Surgery and Medicine · doi:10.1002/lsm.22933 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Tumor treating fields: A novel treatment modality and its use in brain tumors
Hottinger, A. F., Pacheco, P., & Stupp, R. (2016) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now182 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citationCeresoli, G. L., Aerts, J. G., Dziadziuszko, R., Ramlau, R., Cedres, S., van Meerbeeck, J. P., Mencoboni, M., Planchard, D., Chella, A., Crinò, L., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30532-7 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Tumor treating fields increases membrane permeability in glioblastoma cells
Chang, E., Patel, C. B., Pohling, C., Young, C., Song, J., Flores, T. A., Zeng, Y., Joubert, L.-M., Arami, H., Natarajan, A., et al. (2018) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-018-0130-x · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Biological activity of tumor-treating fields in preclinical glioma models
Silginer, M., Weller, M., Stupp, R., & Roth, P. (2017) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2017.171 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationShteingauz, A., Porat, Y., Voloshin, T., Schneiderman, R. S., Munster, M., Zeevi, E., Kaynan, N., Gotlib, K., Giladi, M., Kirson, E. D., et al. (2018) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-018-1085-9 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Overview of Sub-Cellular Mechanisms Involved in the Action of TTFields
Tuszynski, J., Wenger, C., Friesen, D., & Preto, J. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13111128 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Permeabilizing Cell Membranes with Electric Fields
Aguilar, A. A., Ho, M. C., Chang, E., Carlson, K. W., Natarajan, A., Marciano, T., Bomzon, Z., & Patel, C. B. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13092283 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Kessler, A. F., Frömbling, G. E., Gross, F., Hahn, M., Dzokou, W., Ernestus, R.-I., Löhr, M., & Hagemann, C. (2018) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-018-0079-9 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Interpretation of clinical trials that stopped early
Viele, K., McGlothlin, A., & Broglio, K. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.2628 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Synergistic inhibition of glioma cell proliferation by Withaferin A and tumor treating fields
Chang, E., Pohling, C., Beygui, N., Patel, C. B., Rosenberg, J., Ha, D. H., & Gambhir, S. S. (2017) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2534-5 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Schmainda, K. M., Prah, M. A., Marques, H., Kim, E., Barboriak, D. P., & Boxerman, J. L. (2021) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa167 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stupp, R., Taillibert, S., Kanner, A. A., Kesari, S., Steinberg, D. M., Toms, S. A., Taylor, L. P., Lieberman, F., Silvani, A., Fink, K. L., Barnett, G. H., Zhu, J.-J., Henson, J. W., Engelhard, H. H., Chen, T. C., Tran, D. D., Sroubek, J., Tran, N. D., Hottinger, A. F., Landolfi, J., Desai, R., Caroli, M., Kew, Y., Honnorat, J., Idbaih, A., Kirson, E. D., Weinberg, U., Palti, Y., Hegi, M. E., & Ram, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Geisinger Health System (US)
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
- Baylor University Medical Center (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Swedish Medical Center (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
- Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- New Jersey Neuroscience Institute, Edison
- Maine Medical Center (US)
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
- Houston Methodist (US)
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, La Pitié-Salpétrière-University Hospital, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France
- Novocure, Haifa, Israel
- Corresponding author
- Stupp, Roger
- ORCID
- Stupp, Roger
- Kanner, Andrew A.
- Kesari, Santosh
- Toms, Steven A.
- Taylor, Lynne P.
- Lieberman, Frank
- Silvani, Antonio
- Barnett, Gene H.
- Zhu, Jay-Jiguang
- Henson, John W.
- Engelhard, Herbert H.
- Chen, Thomas C.
- Tran, David D.
- Tran, Nam D.
- Hottinger, Andreas F.
- Caroli, Manuela
- Weinberg, Uri
- Palti, Yoram
- Hegi, Monika E.
- Ram, Zvi
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-12-15
- Volume
- 314
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2535
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2205491921
- Cited by
- 1,259
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 136 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 156 · 2017: 141 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 69.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Merck KGaA
- Novocure
- Genentech
- Mundipharma EDO
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
- Keywords
- glioblastoma, tumor treating fields, temozolomide, maintenance therapy, chemoradiotherapy, progression-free survival, overall survival, antimitotic therapy, central nervous system malignancies, treatment efficacy and safety, randomized controlled trials, transducer array, treatment-related adverse events, neurocognitive function, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Temozolomide, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain Neoplasms, Canada, Carmustine, Combined Modality Therapy, Dacarbazine, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Europe, Female, Glioblastoma, Humans, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating, Young Adult, Republic of Korea, Early Termination of Clinical Trials, Chemoradiotherapy, Maintenance Chemotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review