Cited by 261Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young Children: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Open access
Siu, Albert L., and the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten, Grossman, David C., Baumann, Linda Ciofu, Davidson, Karina W., Ebell, Mark, García, Francisco A. R. +9 more·2016·JAMA

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: New US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in young children. METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and potential harms of brief, formal screening instruments for ASD administered during routine primary care visits and the benefits and potential harms of early behavioral treatment for young children identified with ASD through screening. POPULATION: This recommendation applies to children aged 18 to 30 months who have not been diagnosed with ASD or developmental delay and for whom no concerns of ASD have been raised by parents, other caregivers, or health care professionals. RECOMMENDATION: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for ASD in young children for whom no concerns of ASD have been raised by their parents or a clinician. (I statement).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2016.0018

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such screening instruments could be more useful for identifying possible signs and symptoms of ASD in high-risk populations, for example in young children with older siblings with ASD, or in those referred for speech or other developmental concerns to community paediatric services.

    “In general, such instruments could be more useful for identifying possible signs and symptoms of ASD in high-risk populations, for example in young children with older siblings with ASD 150 , or in those referred for speech or other developmental concerns to community paediatric services 151”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [151]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite AAP recommendations for universal and repeated screening, and despite evidence that timely services can improve long-term DB outcomes, the US Preventive Services Task Force currently rates the evidence for developmental screening as inconclusive, in large part because an unbroken line connecting screening to outcomes has not yet been demonstrated.

    “Despite AAP recommendations for universal and repeated screening, and despite evidence that timely services can improve long-term DB outcomes, the US Preventive Services Task Force currently rates the evidence for developmental screening as inconclusive, in large part because an unbroken line connecting screening to outcomes has not yet been demonstrated.33,34”

    From Early Childhood Care Coordination Through 211: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McPheeters ML, Weitlauf A, Vehorn A, et al. Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Young Children: A Systematic Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force: Evidence Synthesis No. 129 [AHRQ Publication No. 13-05185-EF-1]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016.
  2. Smith T, Groen AD, Wynn JW. Randomized trial of intensive early intervention for children with pervasive developmental disorder. Am J Ment Retard. 2000;105(4):269-285.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siu, A. L., and the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Bibbins-Domingo, K., Grossman, D. C., Baumann, L. C., Davidson, K. W., Ebell, M., García, F. A. R., Gillman, M., Herzstein, J., Kemper, A. R., Krist, A. H., Kurth, A. E., Owens, D. K., Phillips, W. R., Phipps, M. G., & Pignone, M. P.
Affiliations
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Siu, Albert L.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2016-02-16
Volume
315
Issue
7
Pages
691
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2273791272
Cited by
261
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15
FWCI
19.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autism screening, young children, USPSTF recommendations, primary care, screening accuracy, benefits and harms, developmental delay
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant, United States, Advisory Committees, Early Diagnosis, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review