Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 917

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Futier, Emmanuel, Lefrant, Jean-Yves, Guinot, Pierre-Gregoire, Godet, Thomas, Lorne, Emmanuel, Cuvillon, Philippe, Bertran, Sebastien, Leone, Marc, Pastene, Bruno, Piriou, Vincent, Molliex, Serge, Albanese, Jacques, Julia, Jean-Michel, Tavernier, Benoit, Imhoff, Etienne, Bazin, Jean-Etienne, Constantin, Jean-Michel, Pereira, Bruno, Jaber, Samir, for the INPRESS Study Group·2017·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Perioperative hypotension is associated with an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality, but the appropriate management strategy remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate whether an individualized blood pressure management strategy tailored to individual patient physiology could reduce postoperative organ dysfunction. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Intraoperative Norepinephrine to Control Arterial Pressure (INPRESS) study was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial conducted in 9 French university and nonuniversity hospitals. Adult patients (n = 298) at increased risk of postoperative complications with a preoperative acute kidney injury risk index of class III or higher (indicating moderate to high risk of postoperative kidney injury) undergoing major surgery lasting 2 hours or longer under general anesthesia were enrolled from December 4, 2012, through August 28, 2016 (last follow-up, September 28, 2016). Interventions: Individualized management strategy aimed at achieving a systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 10% of the reference value (ie, patient's resting SBP) or standard management strategy of treating SBP less than 80 mm Hg or lower than 40% from the reference value during and for 4 hours following surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and dysfunction of at least 1 organ system of the renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and neurologic systems by day 7 after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome, durations of ICU and hospital stay, adverse events, and all-cause mortality at 30 days after surgery. Results: Among 298 patients who were randomized, 292 patients completed the trial (mean [SD] age, 70 [7] years; 44 [15.1%] women) and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome event occurred in 56 of 147 patients (38.1%) assigned to the individualized treatment strategy vs 75 of 145 patients (51.7%) assigned to the standard treatment strategy (relative risk, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.94; P = .02; absolute risk difference, -14%, 95% CI, -25% to -2%). Sixty-eight patients (46.3%) in the individualized treatment group and 92 (63.4%) in the standard treatment group had postoperative organ dysfunction by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.84; P = .001). There were no significant between-group differences in severe adverse events or 30-day mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients predominantly undergoing abdominal surgery who were at increased postoperative risk, management targeting an individualized systolic blood pressure, compared with standard management, reduced the risk of postoperative organ dysfunction. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01536470.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2017.14172

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 917

Metadata

Authors
Futier, E., Lefrant, J.-Y., Guinot, P.-G., Godet, T., Lorne, E., Cuvillon, P., Bertran, S., Leone, M., Pastene, B., Piriou, V., Molliex, S., Albanese, J., Julia, J.-M., Tavernier, B., Imhoff, E., Bazin, J.-E., Constantin, J.-M., Pereira, B., Jaber, S., & for the INPRESS Study Group
Venue
JAMA
Published
2017-10-10
Volume
318
Issue
14
Pages
1346
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2757139046
Cited by
917
References
3
FWCI
60.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2017.14172
The paper
Futier, E., Lefrant, J.-Y., Guinot, P.-G., Godet, T., Lorne, E., Cuvillon, P., Bertran, S., Leone, M., Pastene, B., Piriou, V., Molliex, S., Albanese, J., Julia, J.-M., Tavernier, B., Imhoff, E., Bazin, J.-E., Constantin, J.-M., Pereira, B., Jaber, S., & for the INPRESS Study Group. (2017). Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.14172

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.