Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Young Adults Using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline With Cardiovascular Events Later in Life

Open access
Yano, Yuichiro, Reis, Jared P., Colangelo, Laura A., Shimbo, Daichi, Viera, Anthony J., Allen, Norrina B., Gidding, Samuel S., Bress, Adam P., Greenland, Philip, Muntner, Paul, Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.·2018·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Little is known regarding the association between level of blood pressure (BP) in young adulthood and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events by middle age. Objective: To assess whether young adults who developed hypertension, defined by the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) BP guideline, before age 40 years have higher risk for CVD events compared with those who maintained normal BP. Design, Setting, and Participants: Analyses were conducted in the prospective cohort Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, started in March 1985. CARDIA enrolled 5115 African American and white participants aged 18 to 30 years from 4 US field centers (Birmingham, Alabama; Chicago, Illinois; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Oakland, California). Outcomes were available through August 2015. Exposures: Using the highest BP measured from the first examination to the examination closest to, but not after, age 40 years, each participant was categorized as having normal BP (untreated systolic BP [SBP] <120 mm Hg and diastolic BP [DBP] <80 mm Hg; n = 2574); elevated BP (untreated SBP 120-129 mm Hg and DBP <80 mm Hg; n = 445); stage 1 hypertension (untreated SBP 130-139 mm Hg or DBP 80-89 mm Hg; n = 1194); or stage 2 hypertension (SBP ≥140 mm Hg, DBP ≥90 mm Hg, or taking antihypertensive medication; n = 638). Main Outcomes and Measures: CVD events: fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or intervention for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Results: The final cohort included 4851 adults (mean age when follow-up for outcomes began, 35.7 years [SD, 3.6]; 2657 women [55%]; 2441 African American [50%]; 206 taking antihypertensive medication [4%]). Over a median follow-up of 18.8 years, 228 incident CVD events occurred (CHD, 109; stroke, 63; heart failure, 48; PAD, 8). CVD incidence rates for normal BP, elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, and stage 2 hypertension were 1.37 (95% CI, 1.07-1.75), 2.74 (95% CI, 1.78-4.20), 3.15 (95% CI, 2.47-4.02), and 8.04 (95% CI, 6.45-10.03) per 1000 person-years, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, hazard ratios for CVD events for elevated BP, stage 1 hypertension, and stage 2 hypertension vs normal BP were 1.67 (95% CI, 1.01-2.77), 1.75 (95% CI, 1.22-2.53), and 3.49 (95% CI, 2.42-5.05), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among young adults, those with elevated blood pressure, stage 1 hypertension, and stage 2 hypertension before age 40 years, as defined by the blood pressure classification in the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines, had significantly higher risk for subsequent cardiovascular disease events compared with those with normal blood pressure before age 40 years. The ACC/AHA blood pressure classification system may help identify young adults at higher risk for cardiovascular disease events.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2018.13551

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Whelton, 2018, 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines., Hypertension, 71, e13
  2. Chobanian, 2003, The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report., JAMA, 289, 2560, 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Friedman, 1988, CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects., J Clin Epidemiol, 41, 1105, 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90080-7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jacobs, 2012, Rate of decline of forced vital capacity predicts future arterial hypertension: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study., Hypertension, 59, 219, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.184101 · DOI
  5. Yano, 2017, Racial differences in associations of blood pressure components in young adulthood with incident cardiovascular disease by middle age: Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study., JAMA Cardiol, 2, 381, 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5678 · DOI
  6. Sidney, 1991, Comparison of 2 methods of assessing physical activity in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study., Am J Epidemiol, 133, 1231, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115835 · DOI
  7. Rosamond, 2012, Classification of heart failure in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study: a comparison of diagnostic criteria., Circ Heart Fail, 5, 152, 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963199 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Luepker, 2003, Case definitions for acute coronary heart disease in epidemiology and clinical research studies., Circulation, 108, 2543, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000100560.46946.EA · DOI · Paper page
  9. Adams, 1993, Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial: TOAST: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment., Stroke, 24, 35, 10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Domanski, 2002, Pulse pressure and cardiovascular disease-related mortality: follow-up study of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT)., JAMA, 287, 2677, 10.1001/jama.287.20.2677 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Paffenbarger, 1971, Chronic disease in former college students: XI: early precursors of nonfatal stroke., Am J Epidemiol, 94, 524, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121351 · DOI
  12. Yano, 2015, Isolated systolic hypertension in young and middle-aged adults and 31-year risk for cardiovascular mortality: the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry study., J Am Coll Cardiol, 65, 327, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.060 · DOI
  13. Gray, 2011, Blood pressure in early adulthood, hypertension in middle age, and future cardiovascular disease mortality: HAHS (Harvard Alumni Health Study)., J Am Coll Cardiol, 58, 2396, 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.045 · DOI
  14. Carson, 2013, Evaluating the Framingham hypertension risk prediction model in young adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study., Hypertension, 62, 1015, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01539 · DOI
  15. Pletcher, 2008, Prehypertension during young adulthood and coronary calcium later in life., Ann Intern Med, 149, 91, 10.7326/0003-4819-149-2-200807150-00005 · DOI
  16. Liu, 2015, Can antihypertensive treatment restore the risk of cardiovascular disease to ideal levels?: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)., J Am Heart Assoc, 4, e002275, 10.1161/JAHA.115.002275 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Zanchetti, 2015, Randomized controlled trials of blood pressure lowering in hypertension: a critical reappraisal., Circ Res, 116, 1058, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303641 · DOI
  18. Strazzullo, 2009, Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective studies., BMJ, 339, b4567, 10.1136/bmj.b4567 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hajjar, 2003, Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000., JAMA, 290, 199, 10.1001/jama.290.2.199 · DOI
  20. Society of Actuaries and Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors of America, 1980, Blood Pressure Study 1979

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Yano, Y., Reis, J. P., Colangelo, L. A., Shimbo, D., Viera, A. J., Allen, N. B., Gidding, S. S., Bress, A. P., Greenland, P., Muntner, P., & Lloyd-Jones, D. M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2018-11-06
Volume
320
Issue
17
Pages
1774
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2900355037
Cited by
350
References
9
FWCI
24.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.