Cited by 85Treatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Effect of Continuing Olanzapine vs Placebo on Relapse Among Patients With Psychotic Depression in Remission: The STOP-PD II Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Flint, Alastair J., Meyers, Barnett S., Rothschild, Anthony J., Whyte, Ellen M., Alexopoulos, George S., Rudorfer, Matthew V., Marino, Patricia, Banerjee, Samprit +5 more·2019·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Psychotic depression is a severely disabling and potentially lethal disorder. Little is known about the efficacy and tolerability of continuing antipsychotic medication for patients with psychotic depression in remission. Objective: To determine the clinical effects of continuing antipsychotic medication once an episode of psychotic depression has responded to combination treatment with an antidepressant and antipsychotic agent. Design, Setting, and Participants: Thirty-six week randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 academic medical centers. Patients aged 18 years or older had an episode of psychotic depression acutely treated with sertraline plus olanzapine for up to 12 weeks and met criteria for remission of psychosis and remission or near-remission of depressive symptoms for 8 weeks before entering the clinical trial. The study was conducted from November 2011 to June 2017, and the final date of follow-up was June 13, 2017. Interventions: Participants were randomized either to continue olanzapine (n = 64) or switch from olanzapine to placebo (n = 62). All participants continued sertraline. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was risk of relapse. Main secondary outcomes were change in weight, waist circumference, lipids, serum glucose, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Results: Among 126 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 55.3 years [14.9 years]; 78 women [61.9%]), 114 (90.5%) completed the trial. At the time of randomization, the median dosage of sertraline was 150 mg/d (interquartile range [IQR], 150-200 mg/d) and the median dosage of olanzapine was 15 mg/d (IQR, 10-20 mg/d). Thirteen participants (20.3%) randomized to olanzapine and 34 (54.8%) to placebo experienced a relapse (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.48; P < .001). The effect of olanzapine on the daily rate of anthropometric and metabolic measures significantly differed from placebo for weight (0.13 lb; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.15), waist circumference (0.009 inches; 95% CI, 0.004 to 0.014), and total cholesterol (0.29 mg/dL; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.45) but was not significantly different for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (0.04 mg/dL; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.10), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.01 mg/dL; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.01), triglyceride (-0.153 mg/dL; 95% CI, -0.306 to 0.004), glucose (-0.02 mg/dL; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.08), or HbA1c levels (-0.0002 mg/dL; 95% CI, -0.0021 to 0.0016). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with psychotic depression in remission, continuing sertraline plus olanzapine compared with sertraline plus placebo reduced the risk of relapse over 36 weeks. This benefit needs to be balanced against potential adverse effects of olanzapine, including weight gain. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01427608.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2019.10517

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent umbrella review of systematic reviews examined 120 putative associations of antidepressant medication and adverse outcomes and observed that while there were some associations, none remained after sensitivity analyses adjusting for confounding by indication; the authors concluded with no absolute contraindication to antidepressants.

    “A recent umbrella review of systematic reviews examined 120 putative associations of antidepressant medication and adverse outcomes and observed that while there were some associations, none of them remained after sensitivity analyses adjusting for confounding by indication and the authors concluded with no absolute contraindication to antidepressants. 523”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders: Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). New York, NY: Biometrics Research Department; 2001.
  2. Guy W. Clinical Global Impressions: ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976:217-222.
  3. Guy W. Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS): ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976:534-537.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flint, A. J., Meyers, B. S., Rothschild, A. J., Whyte, E. M., Alexopoulos, G. S., Rudorfer, M. V., Marino, P., Banerjee, S., Pollari, C. D., Wu, Y., Voineskos, A. N., Mulsant, B. H., & for the STOP-PD II Study Group
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • UMass Memorial Health Care (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Flint, Alastair J.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2019-08-20
Volume
322
Issue
7
Pages
622
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2969989378
Cited by
85
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002384)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH062565, U01MH062518, P50MH113838, U01MH062446, U01MH062624)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
psychotic depression, olanzapine, relapse prevention, sertraline, remission, weight gain, metabolic side effects, glycemic control, HbA1c, serum lipids, waist circumference, drug tolerability, antipsychotic adverse effects
MeSH terms
Olanzapine, Adolescent, Adult, Affective Disorders, Psychotic, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Antipsychotic Agents, Proportional Hazards Models, Sertraline, Secondary Prevention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review