The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral White Matter Lesions
Open accessAbstract
Importance: The effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on brain health remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the association of intensive blood pressure treatment with cerebral white matter lesion and brain volumes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A substudy of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of hypertensive adults 50 years or older without a history of diabetes or stroke at 27 sites in the United States. Randomization began on November 8, 2010. The overall trial was stopped early because of benefit for its primary outcome (a composite of cardiovascular events) and all-cause mortality on August 20, 2015. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on a subset of participants at baseline (n = 670) and at 4 years of follow-up (n = 449); final follow-up date was July 1, 2016. Interventions: Participants were randomized to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal of either less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment, n = 355) or less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment, n = 315). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in total white matter lesion volume from baseline. Change in total brain volume was a secondary outcome. Results: Among 670 recruited patients who had baseline MRI (mean age, 67.3 [SD, 8.2] years; 40.4% women), 449 (67.0%) completed the follow-up MRI at a median of 3.97 years after randomization, after a median intervention period of 3.40 years. In the intensive treatment group, based on a robust linear mixed model, mean white matter lesion volume increased from 4.57 to 5.49 cm3 (difference, 0.92 cm3 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.14]) vs an increase from 4.40 to 5.85 cm3 (difference, 1.45 cm3 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.70]) in the standard treatment group (between-group difference in change, -0.54 cm3 [95% CI, -0.87 to -0.20]). Mean total brain volume decreased from 1134.5 to 1104.0 cm3 (difference, -30.6 cm3 [95% CI, -32.3 to -28.8]) in the intensive treatment group vs a decrease from 1134.0 to 1107.1 cm3 (difference, -26.9 cm3 [95% CI, 24.8 to 28.8]) in the standard treatment group (between-group difference in change, -3.7 cm3 [95% CI, -6.3 to -1.1]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among hypertensive adults, targeting an SBP of less than 120 mm Hg, compared with less than 140 mm Hg, was significantly associated with a smaller increase in cerebral white matter lesion volume and a greater decrease in total brain volume, although the differences were small. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206062.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control
The SPRINT Research Group (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1511939 · Cited by 6,325
A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data
Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P., & Evans, A. C. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.668698 · Cited by 4,731
Gorelick, P. B., Scuteri, A., Black, S. E., DeCarli, C., Greenberg, S. M., Iadecola, C., Launer, L. J., Laurent, S., Lopez, O. L., Nyenhuis, D., et al. (2011) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0b013e3182299496 · Cited by 3,811
Self-citationThe projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer's disease prevalence
Barnes, D. E., & Yaffe, K. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70072-2 · Cited by 2,666
Silent Brain Infarcts and the Risk of Dementia and Cognitive Decline
Vermeer, S. E., Prins, N. D., den Heijer, T., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P. J., & Breteler, M. M. B. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022066 · Cited by 2,313
(2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9 · Cited by 2,285
Alternative Transformations to Handle Extreme Values of the Dependent Variable
Burbidge, J. B., Magee, L., & Robb, A. L. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478575 · Cited by 1,414
Williamson, J. D., Supiano, M. A., Applegate, W. B., Berlowitz, D. R., Campbell, R. C., Chertow, G. M., Fine, L. J., Haley, W. E., Hawfield, A. T., Ix, J. H., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.7050 · Cited by 1,261
Self-citationWilliamson (2019) · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.21442 · Cited by 1,246
Cited by
High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease
Fuchs, F. D., & Whelton, P. K. (2020) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.14240 · Cited by 1,948
Self-citationDiretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial – 2020
Barroso, W. K. S., Rodrigues, C. I. S., Bortolotto, L. A., Mota-Gomes, M. A., Brandão, A. A., Feitosa, A. D. D. M., Machado, C. A., Poli-de-Figueiredo, C. E., Amodeo, C., Mion, D., et al. (2021) · Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia · doi:10.36660/abc.20201238 · Cited by 1,068
Hughes, D., Judge, C., Murphy, R., Loughlin, E., Costello, M., Whiteley, W., Bosch, J., O’Donnell, M. J., & Canavan, M. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.4249 · Cited by 472
Mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction in CKD
Viggiano, D., Wagner, C. A., Martino, G., Nedergaard, M., Zoccali, C., Unwin, R., & Capasso, G. (2020) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-020-0266-9 · Cited by 392
Hypertension, Neurovascular Dysfunction, and Cognitive Impairment
Santisteban, M. M., Iadecola, C., & Carnevale, D. (2023) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.122.18085 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- The SPRINT MIND Investigators for the SPRINT Research Group, Nasrallah, I. M., Pajewski, N. M., Auchus, A. P., Chelune, G., Cheung, A. K., Cleveland, M. L., Coker, L. H., Crowe, M. G., Cushman, W. C., Cutler, J. A., Davatzikos, C., Desiderio, L., Doshi, J., Erus, G., Fine, L. J., Gaussoin, S. A., Harris, D., Johnson, K. C., Kimmel, P. L., Kurella Tamura, M., Launer, L. J., Lerner, A. J., Lewis, C. E., Martindale-Adams, J., Moy, C. S., Nichols, L. O., Oparil, S., Ogrocki, P. K., Rahman, M., Rapp, S. R., Reboussin, D. M., Rocco, M. V., Sachs, B. C., Sink, K. M., Still, C. H., Supiano, M. A., Snyder, J. K., Wadley, V. G., Walker, J., Weiner, D. E., Whelton, P. K., Wilson, V. M., Woolard, N., Wright, J. T., Wright, C. B., Williamson, J. D., & Bryan, R. N.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-08-13
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 524
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2967318538
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 34.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral White Matter Lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2019.10551
- The paper
- The SPRINT MIND Investigators for the SPRINT Research Group, Nasrallah, I. M., Pajewski, N. M., Auchus, A. P., Chelune, G., Cheung, A. K., Cleveland, M. L., Coker, L. H., Crowe, M. G., Cushman, W. C., Cutler, J. A., Davatzikos, C., Desiderio, L., Doshi, J., Erus, G., Fine, L. J., Gaussoin, S. A., Harris, D., Johnson, K. C., . . . Bryan, R. N. (2019). Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral White Matter Lesions. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.10551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.