Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 855

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Hydrocortisone on Mortality and Organ Support in Patients With Severe COVID-19: The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Corticosteroid Domain Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
The Writing Committee for the REMAP-CAP Investigators, Angus, Derek C., Derde, Lennie, Al-Beidh, Farah, Annane, Djillali, Arabi, Yaseen, Beane, Abigail, van Bentum-Puijk, Wilma, Berry, Lindsay, Bhimani, Zahra, Bonten, Marc, Bradbury, Charlotte, Brunkhorst, Frank, Buxton, Meredith, Buzgau, Adrian, Cheng, Allen C., de Jong, Menno, Detry, Michelle, Estcourt, Lise, Fitzgerald, Mark, Goossens, Herman, Green, Cameron, Haniffa, Rashan, Higgins, Alisa M., Horvat, Christopher, Hullegie, Sebastiaan J., Kruger, Peter, Lamontagne, Francois, Lawler, Patrick R., Linstrum, Kelsey, Litton, Edward, Lorenzi, Elizabeth, Marshall, John, McAuley, Daniel, McGlothin, Anna, McGuinness, Shay, McVerry, Bryan, Montgomery, Stephanie, Mouncey, Paul, Murthy, Srinivas, Nichol, Alistair, Parke, Rachael, Parker, Jane, Rowan, Kathryn, Sanil, Ashish, Santos, Marlene, Saunders, Christina, Seymour, Christopher, Turner, Anne, van de Veerdonk, Frank, Venkatesh, Balasubramanian, Zarychanski, Ryan, Berry, Scott, Lewis, Roger J., McArthur, Colin, Webb, Steven A., Gordon, Anthony C.·2020·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Evidence regarding corticosteroid use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited. Objective: To determine whether hydrocortisone improves outcome for patients with severe COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: An ongoing adaptive platform trial testing multiple interventions within multiple therapeutic domains, for example, antiviral agents, corticosteroids, or immunoglobulin. Between March 9 and June 17, 2020, 614 adult patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and randomized within at least 1 domain following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for respiratory or cardiovascular organ support at 121 sites in 8 countries. Of these, 403 were randomized to open-label interventions within the corticosteroid domain. The domain was halted after results from another trial were released. Follow-up ended August 12, 2020. Interventions: The corticosteroid domain randomized participants to a fixed 7-day course of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg or 100 mg every 6 hours) (n = 143), a shock-dependent course (50 mg every 6 hours when shock was clinically evident) (n = 152), or no hydrocortisone (n = 108). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was organ support-free days (days alive and free of ICU-based respiratory or cardiovascular support) within 21 days, where patients who died were assigned -1 day. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model that included all patients enrolled with severe COVID-19, adjusting for age, sex, site, region, time, assignment to interventions within other domains, and domain and intervention eligibility. Superiority was defined as the posterior probability of an odds ratio greater than 1 (threshold for trial conclusion of superiority >99%). Results: After excluding 19 participants who withdrew consent, there were 384 patients (mean age, 60 years; 29% female) randomized to the fixed-dose (n = 137), shock-dependent (n = 146), and no (n = 101) hydrocortisone groups; 379 (99%) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The mean age for the 3 groups ranged between 59.5 and 60.4 years; most patients were male (range, 70.6%-71.5%); mean body mass index ranged between 29.7 and 30.9; and patients receiving mechanical ventilation ranged between 50.0% and 63.5%. For the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively, the median organ support-free days were 0 (IQR, -1 to 15), 0 (IQR, -1 to 13), and 0 (-1 to 11) days (composed of 30%, 26%, and 33% mortality rates and 11.5, 9.5, and 6 median organ support-free days among survivors). The median adjusted odds ratio and bayesian probability of superiority were 1.43 (95% credible interval, 0.91-2.27) and 93% for fixed-dose hydrocortisone, respectively, and were 1.22 (95% credible interval, 0.76-1.94) and 80% for shock-dependent hydrocortisone compared with no hydrocortisone. Serious adverse events were reported in 4 (3%), 5 (3%), and 1 (1%) patients in the fixed-dose, shock-dependent, and no hydrocortisone groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with severe COVID-19, treatment with a 7-day fixed-dose course of hydrocortisone or shock-dependent dosing of hydrocortisone, compared with no hydrocortisone, resulted in 93% and 80% probabilities of superiority with regard to the odds of improvement in organ support-free days within 21 days. However, the trial was stopped early and no treatment strategy met prespecified criteria for statistical superiority, precluding definitive conclusions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02735707.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2020.17022

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 855

Metadata

Authors
The Writing Committee for the REMAP-CAP Investigators, Angus, D. C., Derde, L., Al-Beidh, F., Annane, D., Arabi, Y., Beane, A., van Bentum-Puijk, W., Berry, L., Bhimani, Z., Bonten, M., Bradbury, C., Brunkhorst, F., Buxton, M., Buzgau, A., Cheng, A. C., de Jong, M., Detry, M., Estcourt, L., Fitzgerald, M., Goossens, H., Green, C., Haniffa, R., Higgins, A. M., Horvat, C., Hullegie, S. J., Kruger, P., Lamontagne, F., Lawler, P. R., Linstrum, K., Litton, E., Lorenzi, E., Marshall, J., McAuley, D., McGlothin, A., McGuinness, S., McVerry, B., Montgomery, S., Mouncey, P., Murthy, S., Nichol, A., Parke, R., Parker, J., Rowan, K., Sanil, A., Santos, M., Saunders, C., Seymour, C., Turner, A., van de Veerdonk, F., Venkatesh, B., Zarychanski, R., Berry, S., Lewis, R. J., McArthur, C., Webb, S. A., & Gordon, A. C.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2020-10-06
Volume
324
Issue
13
Pages
1317
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3081877184
Cited by
855
References
8
FWCI
21.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.