Cited by 1,962COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesRespiratory Support and MechanismsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with Covid-19.

Open access
The REMAP-CAP Investigators·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is unclear. METHODS: We evaluated tocilizumab and sarilumab in an ongoing international, multifactorial, adaptive platform trial. Adult patients with Covid-19, within 24 hours after starting organ support in the intensive care unit (ICU), were randomly assigned to receive tocilizumab (8 mg per kilogram of body weight), sarilumab (400 mg), or standard care (control). The primary outcome was respiratory and cardiovascular organ support-free days, on an ordinal scale combining in-hospital death (assigned a value of -1) and days free of organ support to day 21. The trial uses a Bayesian statistical model with predefined criteria for superiority, efficacy, equivalence, or futility. An odds ratio greater than 1 represented improved survival, more organ support-free days, or both. RESULTS: Both tocilizumab and sarilumab met the predefined criteria for efficacy. At that time, 353 patients had been assigned to tocilizumab, 48 to sarilumab, and 402 to control. The median number of organ support-free days was 10 (interquartile range, -1 to 16) in the tocilizumab group, 11 (interquartile range, 0 to 16) in the sarilumab group, and 0 (interquartile range, -1 to 15) in the control group. The median adjusted cumulative odds ratios were 1.64 (95% credible interval, 1.25 to 2.14) for tocilizumab and 1.76 (95% credible interval, 1.17 to 2.91) for sarilumab as compared with control, yielding posterior probabilities of superiority to control of more than 99.9% and of 99.5%, respectively. An analysis of 90-day survival showed improved survival in the pooled interleukin-6 receptor antagonist groups, yielding a hazard ratio for the comparison with the control group of 1.61 (95% credible interval, 1.25 to 2.08) and a posterior probability of superiority of more than 99.9%. All secondary analyses supported efficacy of these interleukin-6 receptor antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with Covid-19 receiving organ support in ICUs, treatment with the interleukin-6 receptor antagonists tocilizumab and sarilumab improved outcomes, including survival. (REMAP-CAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02735707.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2100433

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]World Health Organization Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic 2021 https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 37184163
  2. [16]Low-cost dexamethasone reduces death by up to one third in hospitalised patients with severe respiratory complications of COVID-19 2020 6 16 Press release, https://www.recoverytrial.net/news/low-cost-dexamethasone-reduces-death-by-up-to-one-third-in-hospitalised-patients-with-severe-respiratory-complications-of-covid-19
  3. [23]Sanofi provides update on Kevzara (sarilumab) phase 3 trial in severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients outside the U.S 2020 9 1 Press release https://www.sanofi.com/en/media-room/press-releases/2020/2020-09-01-07-00-00
  4. [24]Sanofi and Regeneron provide update on Kevzara (sarilumab) phase 3 U.S. trial in COVID-19 patients 2020 7 2 Press release https://www.sanofi.com/en/media-room/press-releases/2020/2020-07-02-22-30-00

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The REMAP-CAP Investigators
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
The REMAP-CAP Investigators
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
384
Issue
16
Pages
1491-1502
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3130126061
Cited by
1,962
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 220 · 2023: 320 · 2022: 589 · 2021: 615 · 2020: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
138.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust Innovations Project (215522)
  • National Institute for Health Research, Research Professorship (RP-2015-06-18)
  • National Institute for Health Research, Clinician ScientistNational Institute for Health Research, Research Professorship (CS-2016-16-011)
  • European Union, FP7 (#602525)
  • European Union Horizon 2020 (#101003589)
  • Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (#APP1101719)
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand (#16/631)
  • Canadian Institute of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Innovative Clinical Trials Program (#158584)
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Health Research Board of Ireland (CTN 2014-012)
  • UPMC Learning While Doing Program
  • Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  • French Ministry of Health (PHRC-20-0147)
  • Minderoo Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
IL-6 receptor inhibitor, tocilizumab, sarilumab, COVID-19 pandemic, critically ill patients, organ support, intensive care unit, cytokine storm
MeSH terms
COVID-19, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Respiration, Artificial, Odds Ratio, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, Receptors, Interleukin-6, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review