Cited by 110Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Effect of e-Cigarettes Plus Counseling vs Counseling Alone on Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Eisenberg, Mark J., Hébert-Losier, Andréa, Windle, Sarah B., Greenspoon, Todd, Brandys, Tim, Fülöp, Tamàs, Nguyen, Thang, Elkouri, Stéphane +10 more·2020·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) for smoking cessation remain controversial. Objective: To evaluate e-cigarettes with individual counseling for smoking cessation. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial enrolled adults motivated to quit smoking from November 2016 to September 2019 at 17 Canadian sites (801 individuals screened; 274 ineligible and 151 declined). Manufacturing delays resulted in early termination (376/486 participants, 77% of target). Outcomes through 24 weeks (March 2020) are reported. Interventions: Randomization to nicotine e-cigarettes (n = 128), nonnicotine e-cigarettes (n = 127), or no e-cigarettes (n = 121) for 12 weeks. All groups received individual counseling. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was point prevalence abstinence (7-day recall, biochemically validated using expired carbon monoxide) at 12 weeks, changed from 52 weeks following early termination. Participants missing data were assumed to be smoking. The 7 secondary end points, examined at multiple follow-ups, were point prevalence abstinence at other follow-ups, continuous abstinence, daily cigarette consumption change, serious adverse events, adverse events, dropouts due to adverse effects, and treatment adherence. Results: Among 376 randomized participants (mean age, 52 years; 178 women [47%]), 299 (80%) and 278 (74%) self-reported smoking status at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. Point prevalence abstinence was significantly greater for nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone at 12 weeks (21.9% vs 9.1%; risk difference [RD], 12.8 [95% CI, 4.0 to 21.6]) but not 24 weeks (17.2% vs 9.9%; RD, 7.3 [95% CI, -1.2 to 15.7]). Point prevalence abstinence for nonnicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling was not significantly different from counseling alone at 12 weeks (17.3% vs 9.1%; RD, 8.2 [95% CI, -0.1 to 16.6]), but was significantly greater at 24 weeks (20.5% vs 9.9%; RD, 10.6 [95% CI, 1.8 to 19.4]). Adverse events were common (nicotine e-cigarette with counseling: 120 [94%]; nonnicotine e-cigarette with counseling: 118 [93%]; counseling only: 88 [73%]), with the most common being cough (64%) and dry mouth (53%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults motivated to quit smoking, nicotine e-cigarettes plus counseling vs counseling alone significantly increased point prevalence abstinence at 12 weeks. However, the difference was no longer significant at 24 weeks, and trial interpretation is limited by early termination and inconsistent findings for nicotine and nonnicotine e-cigarettes, suggesting further research is needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02417467.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2020.18889

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenberg, M. J., Hébert-Losier, A., Windle, S. B., Greenspoon, T., Brandys, T., Fülöp, T., Nguyen, T., Elkouri, S., Montigny, M., Wilderman, I., Bertrand, O. F., Bostwick, J. A., Abrahamson, J., Lacasse, Y., Pakhale, S., Cabaussel, J., Filion, K. B., & E3 Investigators
Affiliations
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
  • Hamilton Community Health Centre, Family Health Organization, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • Ottawa Hospital (CA)
  • Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement (CA)
  • St. Boniface Hospital (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Centre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Laval (CA)
  • Wilderman Medical Clinic (CA)
  • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA)
  • Montfort Hospital (CA)
  • Toronto East General Hospital (CA)
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Eisenberg, Mark J.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2020-11-10
Volume
324
Issue
18
Pages
1844
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W3104688367
Cited by
110
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
electronic cigarettes, smoking cessation, nicotine e-cigarettes, individual counseling, nicotine replacement therapy, abstinence, expired carbon monoxide, adverse events, medication adherence, early trial termination, tobacco control, tobacco control research funding
MeSH terms
Smoking Reduction, Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation, Early Termination of Clinical Trials, Self Report, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review