Cited by 129SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Association of Primary and Booster Vaccination and Prior Infection With SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe COVID-19 Outcomes

Open access
Lin, Dan-Yu, Gu, Yu, Xu, Yangjianchen, Wheeler, Bradford, Young, Hayley, Sunny, Shadia Khan, Moore, Zack, Zeng, Donglin·2022·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Data about the association of COVID-19 vaccination and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection with risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes may guide prevention strategies. Objective: To estimate the time-varying association of primary and booster COVID-19 vaccination and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection with subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and death. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort study of 10.6 million residents in North Carolina from March 2, 2020, through June 3, 2022. Exposures: COVID-19 primary vaccine series and boosters and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate ratio (RR) of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hazard ratio (HR) of COVID-19–related hospitalization and death. Results: The median age among the 10.6 million participants was 39 years; 51.3% were female, 71.5% were White, and 9.9% were Hispanic. As of June 3, 2022, 67% of participants had been vaccinated. There were 2 771 364 SARS-CoV-2 infections, with a hospitalization rate of 6.3% and mortality rate of 1.4%. The adjusted RR of the primary vaccine series compared with being unvaccinated against infection became 0.53 (95% CI, 0.52-0.53) for BNT162b2, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.51-0.53) for mRNA-1273, and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.50-0.53) for Ad26.COV2.S 10 months after the first dose, but the adjusted HR for hospitalization remained at 0.29 (95% CI, 0.24-0.35) for BNT162b2, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.23-0.32) for mRNA-1273, and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.29-0.42) for Ad26.COV2.S and the adjusted HR of death remained at 0.23 (95% CI, 0.17-0.29) for BNT162b2, 0.15 (95% CI, 0.11-0.20) for mRNA-1273, and 0.24 (95% CI, 0.19-0.31) for Ad26.COV2.S. For the BNT162b2 primary series, boosting in December 2021 with BNT162b2 had the adjusted RR relative to primary series of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.38-0.40) and boosting with mRNA-1273 had the adjusted RR of 0.32 (95% CI, 0.30-0.34) against infection after 1 month and boosting with BNT162b2 had the adjusted RR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.82-0.86) and boosting with mRNA-1273 had the adjusted RR of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.57-0.62) after 3 months. Among all participants, the adjusted RR of Omicron infection compared with no prior infection was estimated at 0.23 (95% CI, 0.22-0.24) against infection, and the adjusted HRs were 0.10 (95% CI, 0.07-0.14) against hospitalization and 0.11 (95% CI, 0.08-0.15) against death after 4 months. Conclusions and Relevance: Receipt of primary COVID-19 vaccine series compared with being unvaccinated, receipt of boosters compared with primary vaccination, and prior infection compared with no prior infection were all significantly associated with lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (including Omicron) and resulting hospitalization and death. The associated protection waned over time, especially against infection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2022.17876

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Boosting by BNT162b2 or CoronaVac restores strong protection against hospitalization and death, but the incremental effectiveness of BNT162b2 boosters against such outcomes waned over 4-6 months for adults and the elderly.

    “Further, although boosting by BNT162b2 or CoronaVac restores strong protection against hospitalization and death33–35, the incremental effectiveness of BNT162b2 boosters against such outcomes waned over the course of 4–6 months34 for both adults and the elderly36.”

    From Real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron BA.2 variant in a SARS-CoV-2 infection-naive population (2023) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that booster effectiveness relative to the primary series waned over 4–6 months. The Association of Booster Vaccination With Outcomes section (page unavailable) reports strong early protection against hospitalization and death, but the cited passages do not establish 4–6-month waning specifically for BNT162b2 boosters against both severe outcomes. This paper also does not study CoronaVac; other citations accompany that part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34(2):187-202.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, D.-Y., Gu, Y., Xu, Y., Wheeler, B., Young, H., Sunny, S. K., Moore, Z., & Zeng, D.
Affiliations
  • Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • NC Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2022-10-11
Volume
328
Issue
14
Pages
1415
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4297242685
Cited by
129
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 7
FWCI
14.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL149683)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG009974)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM124104)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccination, booster vaccination, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, breakthrough infection, severe COVID-19 outcomes, COVID-19 hospitalization, COVID-19 mortality, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, Ad26.COV2-S, SARS-CoV-2
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Ad26COVS1, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Vaccination, Viral Vaccines, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review