Cited by 628SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Association Between 3 Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine and Symptomatic Infection Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta Variants

Open access
Accorsi, Emma K., Britton, Amadea, Fleming-Dutra, Katherine E., Smith, Zachary R., Shang, Nong, Derado, Gordana, Miller, Joseph, Schrag, Stephanie J. +1 more·2022·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Assessing COVID-19 vaccine performance against the rapidly spreading SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is critical to inform public health guidance. Objective: To estimate the association between receipt of 3 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, stratified by variant (Omicron and Delta). Design, Setting, and Participants: A test-negative case-control analysis among adults 18 years or older with COVID-like illness tested December 10, 2021, through January 1, 2022, by a national pharmacy-based testing program (4666 COVID-19 testing sites across 49 US states). Exposures: Three doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (third dose ≥14 days before test and ≥6 months after second dose) vs unvaccinated and vs 2 doses 6 months or more before test (ie, eligible for a booster dose). Main Outcomes and Measures: Association between symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (stratified by Omicron or Delta variants defined using S-gene target failure) and vaccination (3 doses vs unvaccinated and 3 doses vs 2 doses). Associations were measured with multivariable multinomial regression. Among cases, a secondary outcome was median cycle threshold values (inversely proportional to the amount of target nucleic acid present) for 3 viral genes, stratified by variant and vaccination status. Results: Overall, 23 391 cases (13 098 Omicron; 10 293 Delta) and 46 764 controls were included (mean age, 40.3 [SD, 15.6] years; 42 050 [60.1%] women). Prior receipt of 3 mRNA vaccine doses was reported for 18.6% (n = 2441) of Omicron cases, 6.6% (n = 679) of Delta cases, and 39.7% (n = 18 587) of controls; prior receipt of 2 mRNA vaccine doses was reported for 55.3% (n = 7245), 44.4% (n = 4570), and 41.6% (n = 19 456), respectively; and being unvaccinated was reported for 26.0% (n = 3412), 49.0% (n = 5044), and 18.6% (n = 8721), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 3 doses vs unvaccinated was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.31-0.35) for Omicron and 0.065 (95% CI, 0.059-0.071) for Delta; for 3 vaccine doses vs 2 doses the adjusted odds ratio was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.32-0.36) for Omicron and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.14-0.17) for Delta. Median cycle threshold values were significantly higher in cases with 3 doses vs 2 doses for both Omicron and Delta (Omicron N gene: 19.35 vs 18.52; Omicron ORF1ab gene: 19.25 vs 18.40; Delta N gene: 19.07 vs 17.52; Delta ORF1ab gene: 18.70 vs 17.28; Delta S gene: 23.62 vs 20.24). Conclusions and Relevance: Among individuals seeking testing for COVID-like illness in the US in December 2021, receipt of 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (compared with unvaccinated and with receipt of 2 doses) was less likely among cases with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with test-negative controls. These findings suggest that receipt of 3 doses of mRNA vaccine, relative to being unvaccinated and to receipt of 2 doses, was associated with protection against both the Omicron and Delta variants, although the higher odds ratios for Omicron suggest less protection for Omicron than for Delta.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2022.0470

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. World Health Organization. Enhancing response to OMICRON (COVID-19 variant B.1.1.529): Technical brief and priority actions for Member States. January 7, 2022. Accessed January 11, 2022. https:// www.who.int/publications/m/item/enhancing- readiness-for-omicron-(b.1.1.529)-technical-brief- and-priority-actions-for-member-states 3. CDC COVID-19 Response Team. SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant-United States, December 1-8, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(50):1731-1734. doi:10.15585/mmwr. mm7050e1 · DOI
  2. Wang L, Cheng G. Sequence analysis of the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron in South Africa. J Med Virol. 2021;1-6. doi:10.1002/jmv. 27516 · DOI
  3. Miller MF, Shi M, Motsinger-Reif A, Weinberg CR, Miller JD, Nichols E. Community-based testing sites for SARS-CoV-2-United States, March 2020-November 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(49):1706-1711. doi:10.15585/mmwr. mm7049a3 · DOI
  4. Vandenbroucke JP, Pearce N. Test-negative designs: differences and commonalities with other case-control studies with "other patient" controls. Epidemiology. 2019;30(6):838-844. doi:10.1097/ EDE.0000000000001088 · DOI
  5. Chua H, Feng S, Lewnard JA, et al. The use of test-negative controls to monitor vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review of methodology. Epidemiology. 2020;31(1):43-64. doi:10.1097/EDE. 0000000000001116 · DOI
  6. Sullivan SG, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Cowling BJ. Theoretical basis of the test-negative study design for assessment of influenza vaccine effectiveness. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;184(5):345-353. doi:10.1093/ aje/kww064 · DOI
  7. Jackson ML, Phillips CH, Benoit J, et al. The impact of selection bias on vaccine effectiveness estimates from test-negative studies. Vaccine. 2018;36(5):751-757. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.022 · DOI
  8. Embi PJ, Levy ME, Naleway AL, et al. Effectiveness of 2-dose vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalizations among immunocompromised adults-nine states, January-September 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(44):1553- 1559. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7044e3 · DOI
  9. Mbaeyi S, Oliver SE, Collins JP et al. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' interim recommendations for additional primary and booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines-United States, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021; 70:1545-1552. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7044e2 · DOI
  10. Scott L, Hsiao NY, Moyo S, et al. Track Omicron's spread with molecular data. Science. 2021;374(6574):1454-1455. doi:10.1126/science. abn4543 · DOI
  11. Chemaitelly H, Tang P, Hasan MR, et al. Waning of BNT162b2 vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(24):e83. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2114114 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Tabak YP, Sun X, Brennan TA, Chaguturu SK. Incidence and estimated vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection among persons tested in US retail locations, May 1 to August 7, 2021. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12): e2143346. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021. 43346 · DOI
  13. Bruxvoort KJ, Sy LS, Qian L, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against delta, mu, and other emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2: test negative case-control study. BMJ. 2021;375:e068848. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068848 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cele S, Jackson L, Khoury DS, et al. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature. Published online December 23, 2021. doi:10.1038/d41586-021- 03824-5 · DOI
  15. Dejnirattisai W, Shaw RH, Supasa P et al. Reduced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 omicron B.1.1.529 variant by post-immunisation serum. Lancet. 2021;399(10321):234-236. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736 (21)02844-0 · DOI
  16. Kissler SM, Fauver JR, Mack C, et al. Viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinated and unvaccinated persons. N Engl J Med. 2021;385 (26):2489-2491. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2102507 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Bullard J, Dust K, Funk D, et al. Predicting infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from diagnostic samples. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(10):2663-2666. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa63 · DOI
  18. Al Bayat S, Mundodan J, Hasnain S, et al. Can the cycle threshold (Ct) value of RT-PCR test for SARS CoV2 predict infectivity among close contacts? J Infect Public Health. 2021;14(9):1201-1205. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2021.08.013 · DOI
  19. Singanayagam A, Patel M, Charlett A, et al. Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(32):2001483. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES. 2020.25.32.2001483 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Salvatore PP, Dawson P, Wadhwa A, et al. Epidemiological correlates of polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold values in the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(11):e761-e767. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1469 · DOI
  21. Marcus JE, Frankel DN, Pawlak MT, et al. Risk factors associated with COVID-19 transmission among US Air Force trainees in a congregant setting. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e210202- e210202. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0202 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Accorsi, E. K., Britton, A., Fleming-Dutra, K. E., Smith, Z. R., Shang, N., Derado, G., Miller, J., Schrag, S. J., & Verani, J. R.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Accorsi, Emma K.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2022-02-15
Volume
327
Issue
7
Pages
639
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4206040938
Cited by
628
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 332 · 2021: 1
FWCI
75.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccines, third vaccine dose, booster vaccination, mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, Omicron variant, Delta variant, symptomatic infection, vaccine effectiveness, S-gene target failure, cycle threshold, test-negative case-control, COVID-19 prevention
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Vaccine Efficacy, BNT162 Vaccine, 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review