Cited by 78Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

AI in Medicine—JAMA’s Focus on Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Care, Quality, and Equity

Khera, Rohan, Butte, Atul J., Berkwits, Michael, Hswen, Yulin, Flanagin, Annette, Park, Hannah, Curfman, Gregory, Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten·2023·JAMA

Abstract

The transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has been forecast for decades, 1 but only recently have technological advances appeared to capture some of the complexity of health and disease and how health care is delivered. 2ecent emergence of large language models (LLMs) in highly visible and interactive applications 3 has ignited interest in how new AI technologies can improve medicine and health for patients, the public, clinicians, health systems, and more.The rapidity of these developments, their potential impact on health care, and JAMA's mission to publish the best science that advances medicine and public health compel the journal to renew its commitment to facilitating the rigorous scientific development, evaluation, and implementation of AI in health care.JAMA editors are committed to promoting discoveries in AI science, rigorously evaluating new advances for their impact on the health of patients and populations, assessing the value such advances bring to health systems and society nationally and globally, and examining progress toward equity, fairness, and the reduction of historical medical bias.Moreover, JAMA's mission is to ensure that these scientific advances are clearly communicated in a manner that enhances the collective understanding of the domain for all stakeholders in medicine and public health. 4For scientific development of AI to be most effective for improving medicine and public health requires a platform that recognizes and supports the vision of rapid cycle innovation and is also fundamentally grounded in the principles of reliable and reproducible clinical research that is ethically sound, respectful of rights to privacy, and representative of diverse populations. 2,3,5he scientific development in AI can be viewed through the framework used to describe other health-related sciences. 6n these domains, scientific discoveries begin with identifying biological mechanisms of disease.Then inventions that target these mechanisms are tested in progressively larger groups of people with and without diseases to assess the effectiveness and safety of these interventions.These are then scaled to large studies evaluating outcomes for individuals and populations with the disease.This well-established scientific development framework can work for research in AI as well, with reportable stages as inventions and findings move from one stage to the next.The editors seek original science that focuses on developing, testing, and deploying AI in studies that improve under-

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2023.15481

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI-based computational methods can analyze complex datasets and extract clinically meaningful insights, enabling advances in disease diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision support.

    “Artificial intelligence (AI)—based computational methods have emerged as a powerful tool to analyze these complex datasets and extract clinically meaningful insights, enabling advances in disease diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision support (Khera et al, 2023; Saab et al, 2025; Tu et al, 2025).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khera, R., Butte, A. J., Berkwits, M., Hswen, Y., Flanagin, A., Park, H., Curfman, G., & Bibbins-Domingo, K.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Electronic Editor, JAMA and JAMA Network
  • Executive Managing Editor, JAMA and JAMA Network
  • Managing Director of Strategy and Planning, JAMA and JAMA Network
  • Executive Editor, JAMA and JAMA Network
  • Editor in Chief, JAMA and JAMA Network
Venue
JAMA
Published
2023-09-05
Volume
330
Issue
9
Pages
818
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4385751201
Cited by
78
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
  • March of Dimes Foundation
  • Leon Lowenstein Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Genentech
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL153775)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, large language models, clinical outcomes, patient-centered care, health equity, medical bias, AI deployment, quality of care, editorial policy
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medicine, Quality of Health Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient-Centered Care, Editorial Policies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review