AI in Medicine—JAMA’s Focus on Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Care, Quality, and Equity
Abstract
The transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has been forecast for decades, 1 but only recently have technological advances appeared to capture some of the complexity of health and disease and how health care is delivered. 2ecent emergence of large language models (LLMs) in highly visible and interactive applications 3 has ignited interest in how new AI technologies can improve medicine and health for patients, the public, clinicians, health systems, and more.The rapidity of these developments, their potential impact on health care, and JAMA's mission to publish the best science that advances medicine and public health compel the journal to renew its commitment to facilitating the rigorous scientific development, evaluation, and implementation of AI in health care.JAMA editors are committed to promoting discoveries in AI science, rigorously evaluating new advances for their impact on the health of patients and populations, assessing the value such advances bring to health systems and society nationally and globally, and examining progress toward equity, fairness, and the reduction of historical medical bias.Moreover, JAMA's mission is to ensure that these scientific advances are clearly communicated in a manner that enhances the collective understanding of the domain for all stakeholders in medicine and public health. 4For scientific development of AI to be most effective for improving medicine and public health requires a platform that recognizes and supports the vision of rapid cycle innovation and is also fundamentally grounded in the principles of reliable and reproducible clinical research that is ethically sound, respectful of rights to privacy, and representative of diverse populations. 2,3,5he scientific development in AI can be viewed through the framework used to describe other health-related sciences. 6n these domains, scientific discoveries begin with identifying biological mechanisms of disease.Then inventions that target these mechanisms are tested in progressively larger groups of people with and without diseases to assess the effectiveness and safety of these interventions.These are then scaled to large studies evaluating outcomes for individuals and populations with the disease.This well-established scientific development framework can work for research in AI as well, with reportable stages as inventions and findings move from one stage to the next.The editors seek original science that focuses on developing, testing, and deploying AI in studies that improve under-
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-based computational methods can analyze complex datasets and extract clinically meaningful insights, enabling advances in disease diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision support.
“Artificial intelligence (AI)—based computational methods have emerged as a powerful tool to analyze these complex datasets and extract clinically meaningful insights, enabling advances in disease diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision support (Khera et al, 2023; Saab et al, 2025; Tu et al, 2025).”
From Artificial intelligence–enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases (2026) · cites this paper as Khera et al, 2023
Cites
The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters
Woolf, S. H. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2007.26 · Cited by 1,910 · see citing works
AI-Generated Medical Advice—GPT and Beyond
Haupt, C. E., & Marks, M. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.5321 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
AI Chatbots, Health Privacy, and Challenges to HIPAA Compliance
Marks, M., & Haupt, C. E. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.9458 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
The case for algorithmic stewardship for artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies
Eaneff, S., Obermeyer, Z., & Butte, A. J. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.9371 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationAction-Informed Artificial Intelligence—Matching the Algorithm to the Problem
Lindsell, C. J., Stead, W. W., & Johnson, K. B. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.5035 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Harnessing the Promise of Artificial Intelligence Responsibly
Dorr, D. A., Adams, L., & Embí, P. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.2771 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Preparing Clinicians for a Clinical World Influenced by Artificial Intelligence
James, C. A., Wachter, R. M., & Woolliscroft, J. O. (2022) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2022.3580 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The Urgency of Now and the Responsibility to Do More—My Commitment for JAMA and the JAMA Network
Bibbins-Domingo, K. B. (2022) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2022.11108 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationMedical Informatics/Computers in Medicine
Lindberg, D. A. B. (1986) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1986.03380150130044 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automation Bias and Assistive AI: Risk of Harm From AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support
Khera, R., Simon, M. A., & Ross, J. S. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.22557 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhancing diagnostic capability with multi-agents conversational large language models
Chen, X., Yi, H., You, M., Liu, W., Wang, L., Li, H., Zhang, X., Guo, Y., Fan, L., Chen, G., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01550-0 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Berkhout, W. E. M., van Wijngaarden, J. J., Workum, J. D., van de Sande, D., Hilling, D. E., Jung, C., Meyfroidt, G., Gommers, D., Buijsman, S. N. R., & van Genderen, M. E. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22866 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Chen, X., Wang, L., You, M., Liu, W., Fu, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, S., Chen, G., Li, K., & Li, J. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/58158 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence–enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases
Tang, A. S., Wei, M. L., Haemel, A., La, C., Sirota, M., & Lee, E. Y. (2026) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2025.10.596 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Khera, R., Butte, A. J., Berkwits, M., Hswen, Y., Flanagin, A., Park, H., Curfman, G., & Bibbins-Domingo, K.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Electronic Editor, JAMA and JAMA Network
- Executive Managing Editor, JAMA and JAMA Network
- Managing Director of Strategy and Planning, JAMA and JAMA Network
- Executive Editor, JAMA and JAMA Network
- Editor in Chief, JAMA and JAMA Network
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2023-09-05
- Volume
- 330
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 818
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4385751201
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 5
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
- March of Dimes Foundation
- Leon Lowenstein Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- Genentech
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL153775)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in healthcare, large language models, clinical outcomes, patient-centered care, health equity, medical bias, AI deployment, quality of care, editorial policy
- MeSH terms
- Health Equity, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medicine, Quality of Health Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient-Centered Care, Editorial Policies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review