Cited by 222Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Automation Bias and Assistive AI: Risk of Harm From AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support

Khera, Rohan, Simon, Melissa A., Ross, Joseph S.·2023·JAMA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2023.22557

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khera, R., Simon, M. A., & Ross, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Northwestern Medicine (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2023-12-19
Volume
330
Issue
23
Pages
2255
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4389948084
Cited by
222
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 128 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL153775)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
automation bias, clinical decision support, clinical judgment
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Bias, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review