Cited by 49Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Harnessing the Promise of Artificial Intelligence Responsibly

Dorr, David A., Adams, Laura, Embí, Peter·2023·JAMA

Abstract

This Viewpoint discusses the benefits and potential harms of using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in medicine and proposes the collaborative creation of a Code of Conduct for AI in Health Care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2023.2771

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorr, D. A., Adams, L., & Embí, P.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • National Academy of Medicine (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2023-04-25
Volume
329
Issue
16
Pages
1347
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4361000305
Cited by
49
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, artificial intelligence algorithms, codes of conduct, responsible AI, AI harms, AI ethics, health care
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Social Control, Formal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review