Cited by 434Alcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencySubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Pharmacological Management of Alcohol Withdrawal: A Meta-analysis and Evidence-Based Practice Guideline

Mayo-Smith, Michael F.·1997·JAMA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence-based practice guideline on the pharmacological management of alcohol withdrawal. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles published before July 1, 1995, identified through MEDLINE search on "substance withdrawal--ethyl alcohol" and review of references from identified articles. STUDY SELECTION: Articles with original data on human subjects. DATA ABSTRACTION: Structured review to determine study design, sample size, interventions used, and outcomes of withdrawal severity, delirium, seizures, completion of withdrawal, entry into rehabilitation, adverse effects, and costs. Data from prospective controlled trials with methodologically sound end points corresponding to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, were abstracted by 2 independent reviewers and underwent meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: Benzodiazepines reduce withdrawal severity, reduce incidence of delirium (-4.9 cases per 100 patients; 95% confidence interval, -9.0 to -0.7; P=.04), and reduce seizures (-7.7 seizures per 100 patients; 95% confidence interval, -12.0 to -3.5; P=.003). Individualizing therapy with withdrawal scales results in administration of significantly less medication and shorter treatment (P<.001). beta-Blockers, clonidine, and carbamazepine ameliorate withdrawal severity, but evidence is inadequate to determine their effect on delirium and seizures. Phenothiazines ameliorate withdrawal but are less effective than benzodiazepines in reducing delirium (P=.002) or seizures (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Benzodiazepines are suitable agents for alcohol withdrawal, with choice among different agents guided by duration of action, rapidity of onset, and cost. Dosage should be individualized, based on withdrawal severity measured by withdrawal scales, comorbid illness, and history of withdrawal seizures. beta-Blockers, clonidine, carbamazepine, and neuroleptics may be used as adjunctive therapy but are not recommended as monotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1997.03550020076042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayo-Smith, M. F.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1997-07-09
Volume
278
Issue
2
Pages
144
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2042931973
Cited by
434
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol withdrawal, pharmacological management, benzodiazepines, delirium, withdrawal seizures, beta-blockers, clonidine, carbamazepine, phenothiazines, withdrawal severity, personalized treatment, adjunctive therapy, alcoholism treatment
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Alcohol Withdrawal Delirium, Ethanol, Benzodiazepines, Carbamazepine, Clinical Trials as Topic, Clonidine, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Magnesium, Severity of Illness Index, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Thiamine, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review