The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Dosage and Long Treatment Duration of β-Lactam: Risk Factors for Carriage of Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae
Abstract
CONTEXT: The spread of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the community is a public health problem in developed and developing nations, but whether antibiotic use is responsible for the increase in drug resistance is not known. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae (PRSp) pharyngeal carriage and characteristics of beta-lactam use. DESIGN: Observational study of children attending 20 randomly sampled schools. SETTING: The Loiret, in the center of France. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 941 children, 3 to 6 years old. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pharyngeal carriage of S pneumoniae, antibiotic use, and medical events during the preceding 30 days. Pneumococcal penicillin G sodium minimal inhibitory concentrations and serotyping were performed. RESULTS: Medical illnesses and the use of antibiotics were not associated with PRSp carriage. However, oral beta-lactam use was associated with an increased risk of PRSp carriage (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-8.3; P=.03). Children treated by low daily doses of an oral beta-lactam (defined as lower than clinical recommendations) had an increased risk of PRSp carriage, as compared with children who did not (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 2.1-16.7; P=.002). A treatment of long duration (>5 days) with a beta-lactam was associated with an increased risk of PRSp carriage (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.3-9.8; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a low daily dose and a long duration of treatment with an oral beta-lactam contribute to the selective pressure in promoting pharyngeal carriage of PRSp.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
The crisis in antibiotic resistance
Neu, H. C. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.257.5073.1064 · Cited by 2,834
Cited by
Bell, B. G., Schellevis, F., Stobberingh, E., Goossens, H., & Pringle, M. (2014) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-13 · Cited by 1,262
Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. Part I: recent trends and current status
Okeke, I. N., Laxminarayan, R., Bhutta, Z. A., Duse, A. G., Jenkins, P., O'Brien, T. F., Pablos-Mendez, A., & Klugman, K. P. (2005) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70189-4 · Cited by 851
Short- versus Long-Course Antibacterial Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis
Dimopoulos, G., Matthaiou, D. K., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Grammatikos, A. P., Athanassa, Z., & Falagas, M. E. (2008) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200868130-00004 · Cited by 160
Gonzales, R., Bartlett, J. G., Besser, R. E., Cooper, R. J., Hickner, J. M., Hoffman, J. R., & Sande, M. A. (2001) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1067/s0196-0644(01)70087-x · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillemot, D., Carbon, C., Balkau, B., Geslin, P., Lecoeur, H., Vauzelle-Kervroëdan, F., Bouvenot, G., & Eschwége, E.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-02-04
- Volume
- 279
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 365
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2129097224
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low Dosage and Long Treatment Duration of β-Lactam: Risk Factors for Carriage of Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.279.5.365
- The paper
- Guillemot, D., Carbon, C., Balkau, B., Geslin, P., Lecoeur, H., Vauzelle-Kervroëdan, F., Bouvenot, G., & Eschwége, E. (1998). Low Dosage and Long Treatment Duration of β-Lactam: Risk Factors for Carriage of Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.5.365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.