The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk of Perinatal Death Associated With Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancies
Abstract
CONTEXT: Trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture. However, no reliable data exist on the effect of a trial of labor on the risk of perinatal death in otherwise uncomplicated term pregnancies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of intrapartum stillbirth or neonatal death not related to congenital abnormality among women with uncomplicated term pregnancies who had a trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery, compared with women having a planned repeat cesarean delivery, and multiparous and nulliparous women at term not delivered by planned cesarean method. DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based, retrospective cohort study of data from the linked Scottish Morbidity Record and Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Enquiry encompassing births in Scotland between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1997. POPULATION: A total of 313 238 singleton births between 37 and 43 weeks' gestational age in which the fetus was in a cephalic presentation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Delivery-related perinatal death, defined as intrapartum stillbirth or neonatal death unrelated to congenital anomaly, compared among the 4 groups. RESULTS: Among women who had a trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery (n = 15 515), the overall rate of delivery-related perinatal death was 12.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9-19.9) per 10 000 women. This was approximately 11 times greater (odds ratio [OR], 11.6; 95% CI, 1.6-86.7) than the risk associated with planned repeat cesarean delivery (n = 9014), more than twice (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.5) the risk associated with other multiparous women in labor (n = 151 549), and similar to the risk among nulliparous women in labor (n = 137 160; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-2.1). The associations were not explained by differences in maternal height, smoking status, socioeconomic status, age, fetal growth, or week of gestation at delivery. Among women having a trial of labor, the rate of death due to mechanical causes, including uterine rupture, was 4.5 (95% CI, 1.8-9.3) per 10 000 women. This was more than 8 times greater than other multiparous women (OR, 8.5; 95% CI, 3.2-22.3) and nulliparous women (OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 3.2-24.2). CONCLUSIONS: The absolute risk of perinatal death associated with trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery is low. However, in our study, the risk was significantly higher than that associated with planned repeat cesarean delivery, and there was a marked excess of deaths due to uterine rupture compared with other women in labor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Hannah, M. E., Hannah, W. J., Hewson, S. A., Hodnett, E. D., Saigal, S., & Willan, A. R. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3 · Cited by 1,556
Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery
Lydon-Rochelle, M., Holt, V. L., Easterling, T. R., & Martin, D. P. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200107053450101 · Cited by 932
Comparison of a Trial of Labor with an Elective Second Cesarean Section
McMahon, M. J., Luther, E. R., Bowes, W. A., & Olshan, A. F. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199609053351001 · Cited by 700
Morrison, J. J., Rennie, J. M., & Milton, P. J. (1995) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09060.x · Cited by 629
Mozurkewich, E. L., & Hutton, E. K. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2000.108890 · Cited by 355
Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?
Robson, M. S. (2001) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1053/beog.2000.0156 · Cited by 292
Deprivation and mortality in Scotland, 1981 and 1991
McLoone, P., & Boddy, F. A. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1465 · Cited by 247
Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation
Rageth, J. (1999) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00446-3 · Cited by 227
Stewart, J. H., Andrews, J., & Cartlidge, P. H. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7132.657 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy
Smith, G. C., Pell, J. P., & Bobbie, R. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14896-9 · Cited by 378
Self-citationPhysiology of Fetal Lung Fluid Clearance and the Effect of Labor
Jain, L., & Eaton, D. C. (2006) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2006.01.006 · Cited by 364
Interpregnancy interval and risk of preterm birth and neonatal death: retrospective cohort study
Smith, G. C. S., Pell, J. P., & Dobbie, R. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7410.313 · Cited by 348
Self-citationMaternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study
Macones, G. A., Peipert, J., Nelson, D. B., Odibo, A., Stevens, E. J., Stamilio, D. M., Pare, E., Elovitz, M., Sciscione, A., Sammel, M. D., et al. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.002 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, G. C. S.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-05-22
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2684
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2143999072
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 26.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Perinatal Death Associated With Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.287.20.2684
- The paper
- Smith, G. C. S. (2002). Risk of Perinatal Death Associated With Labor After Previous Cesarean Delivery in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancies. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.20.2684
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.