The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Yu, S. M. (1998) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1021801927353 · Cited by 4,056
Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery
Landon, M. B., Hauth, J. C., Leveno, K. J., Spong, C. Y., Leindecker, S., Varner, M. W., Moawad, A. H., Caritis, S. N., Harper, M., Wapner, R. J., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040405 · Cited by 1,286
Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery
Lydon-Rochelle, M., Holt, V. L., Easterling, T. R., & Martin, D. P. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200107053450101 · Cited by 932
Comparison of a Trial of Labor with an Elective Second Cesarean Section
McMahon, M. J., Luther, E. R., Bowes, W. A., & Olshan, A. F. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199609053351001 · Cited by 700
Smith, G. C. S. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.20.2684 · Cited by 349
Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality.
Rosen, M. G., Dickinson, J. C., & Westhoff, C. L. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 293
Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience.
Miller, D. A. W., Diaz, F., & Paul, R. H. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 247
Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery Versus Trial of Labor: A Prospective Multicenter Study
FLAMM, B. L., GOINGS, J. R., LIU, Y., & WOLDE-TSADIK, G. (1994) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00006250-199406000-00005 · Cited by 241
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: Results of a 5-Year Multicenter Collaborative Study
FLAMM, B. L., NEWMAN, L. A., THOMAS, S. J., FALLON, D., & YOSHIDA, M. M. (1990) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00006250-199011000-00004 · Cited by 224
Cited by
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the united states
Zhang, J., Troendle, J., Reddy, U. M., Laughon, S. K., Branch, D. W., Burkman, R., Landy, H. J., Hibbard, J. U., Haberman, S., Ramirez, M. M., et al. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.058 · Cited by 576
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery
(2019) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003078 · Cited by 530
Metadata
- Authors
- Macones, G. A., Peipert, J., Nelson, D. B., Odibo, A., Stevens, E. J., Stamilio, D. M., Pare, E., Elovitz, M., Sciscione, A., Sammel, M. D., & Ratcliffe, S. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 193
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1656-1662
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022258500
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 20.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.002
- The paper
- Macones, G. A., Peipert, J., Nelson, D. B., Odibo, A., Stevens, E. J., Stamilio, D. M., Pare, E., Elovitz, M., Sciscione, A., Sammel, M. D., & Ratcliffe, S. J. (2005). Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.