The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Content and Design Attributes of Antivaccination Web Sites
Abstract
CONTEXT: Individuals searching the Internet for vaccine information may find antivaccination Web sites. Few published studies have systematically evaluated these sites. OBJECTIVES: To examine antivaccination Web site attributes and to delineate the specific claims and concerns expressed by antivaccination groups. DESIGN AND SETTING: In late 2000, using a metasearch program that incorporates 10 other search engines, we reviewed and analyzed 772 links to find 12 Web sites that promulgated antivaccination information. Analyzing links from these 12 sites yielded another 10 sites, producing a total of 22 sites for study. Using a standardized form, 2 authors (R.M.W., L.K.S.) systematically evaluated these sites based on specific content and design attributes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence or absence of 11 Web site content attributes (antivaccination claims) and 10 Web site design attributes. RESULTS: The most commonly found content claims were that vaccines cause idiopathic illness (100% of sites), vaccines erode immunity (95%), adverse vaccine reactions are underreported (95%), and vaccination policy is motivated by profit (91%). The most common design attributes were the presence of links to other antivaccination sites (100%of sites), information for legally avoiding immunizations (64%), and the use of emotionally charged stories of children who had allegedly been killed or harmed by vaccines (55%). CONCLUSION: Antivaccination Web sites express a range of concerns related to vaccine safety and varying levels of distrust in medicine. The sites rely heavily on emotional appeal to convey their message.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Wakefield, A., Murch, S., Anthony, A., Linnell, J., Casson, D., Malik, M., Berelowitz, M., Dhillon, A., Thomson, M., Harvey, P., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0 · Cited by 3,006
RetractedArky, R. A. (1994) · Cited by 2,632
Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association
Taylor, B., Miller, E., Farrington, C., Petropoulos, M.-C., Favot-Mayaud, I., Li, J., & Waight, P. A. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01239-8 · Cited by 753
Measles and atopy in Guinea-Bissau
Shaheen, S. O., Barker, D. J. P., Heyes, C. B., Shiell, A. W., Aaby, P., Hall, A. J., & Goudiaby, A. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91617-7 · Cited by 579
Atopy in children of families with an anthroposophic lifestyle
Alm, J. S., Swartz, J., Lilja, G., Scheynius, A., & Pershagen, G. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09344-1 · Cited by 530
Do Parents Understand Immunizations? A National Telephone Survey
Gellin, B. G., Maibach, E. W., Marcuse, E. K., & for the National Network for Immunization Information Steering Committee∥ (2000) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.106.5.1097 · Cited by 512
Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review
Kim, P., Eng, T. R., Deering, M. J., & Maxfield, A. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7184.647 · Cited by 498
Anti-vaccinationists past and present
Wolfe, R. M., & Sharp, L. K. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7361.430 · Cited by 497
Self-citationFeikin, D. R. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.24.3145 · Cited by 438
Kaye, J. A., del Mar Melero-Montes, M., & Jick, H. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7284.460 · Cited by 394
Cited by
A postmodern Pandora's box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet
Kata, A. (2010) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022 · Cited by 1,208
Kata, A. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112 · Cited by 1,094
Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications
Dubé, E., Vivion, M., & MacDonald, N. E. (2015) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1586/14760584.2015.964212 · Cited by 986
YouTube as a Source of Information on Immunization: A Content Analysis
Keelan, J., Pavri-Garcia, V., Tomlinson, G., & Wilson, K. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.21.2482 · Cited by 593
Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology
Prior, L. (2003) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00339 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfe, R. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-06-26
- Volume
- 287
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3245
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2156426570
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 80.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Content and Design Attributes of Antivaccination Web Sites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.287.24.3245
- The paper
- Wolfe, R. M. (2002). Content and Design Attributes of Antivaccination Web Sites. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.24.3245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.