The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults.
Abstract
Context Older adults represent the fastest-growing segment of the US population, and prevalences of vision and hearing impairment have been extensively evaluated. However, despite the importance of sense of smell for nutrition and safety, the prevalence of olfactory impairment in older US adults has not been studied. Objective To determine the prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. Design, setting, and participants A total of 2491 Beaver Dam, Wis, residents aged 53 to 97 years participating in the 5-year follow-up examination (1998-2000) for the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study, a population-based, cross-sectional study. Main outcome measures Olfactory impairment, assessed by the San Diego Odor Identification Test and self-report. Results The mean (SD) prevalence of impaired olfaction was 24.5% (1.7%). The prevalence increased with age; 62.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.4%-67.7%) of 80- to 97-year-olds had olfactory impairment. Olfactory impairment was more prevalent among men (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.65-2.19). Current smoking, stroke, epilepsy, and nasal congestion or upper respiratory tract infection were also associated with increased prevalence of olfactory impairment. Self-reported olfactory impairment was low (9.5%) and this measure became less accurate with age. In the oldest group, aged 80 to 97 years, sensitivity of self-report was 12% for women and 18% for men. Conclusions This study demonstrates that prevalence of olfactory i…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Men consistently demonstrated a higher prevalence of olfactory impairment in each age group.”
From Design Principles to Accommodate Older Adults (2012) · cites this paper as Murphy et al., 2002
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Dietary Intake, Dietary Patterns, and Changes With Age: An Epidemiological Perspective
Wakimoto, P., & Block, G. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/56.suppl_2.65 · Cited by 391
Cited by
Sorted by citations
At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer’s disease.
Albers, M. W., Gilmore, G. C., Kaye, J., Murphy, C., Wingfield, A., Bennett, D. A., Boxer, A. L., Buchman, A. S., Cruickshanks, K. J., Devanand, D. P., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.514 · Cited by 589
Self-citationDesign Principles to Accommodate Older Adults
Farage, M. A., Miller, K. W., Ajayi, F., & Hutchins, D. (2012) · Global Journal of Health Science · doi:10.5539/gjhs.v4n2p2 · Cited by 233
“…loss and aging in 2491 adults aged 53 to 97, found the prevalence of olfactory impairment (defined as correctly identifying fewer than 6 of 8 natural odorants commonly found in the home, such as chocolate or coffee) to be 24.5%, rising to 62.5% among those aged 80 or older (Murphy et al., 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialDiagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper
Scadding, G., Hellings, P., Alobid, I., Bachert, C., Fokkens, W., van Wijk, R. G., Gevaert, P., Guilemany, J., Kalogjera, L., Lund, V., et al. (2011) · Clinical and Translational Allergy · doi:10.1186/2045-7022-1-2 · Cited by 220
Meta-analyses on prevalence of selected Parkinson's nonmotor symptoms before and after diagnosis
Chen, H., Zhao, E. J., Zhang, W., Lu, Y., Liu, R., Huang, X., Ciesielski-Jones, A. J., Justice, M. A., Cousins, D. S., & Peddada, S. (2015) · Translational Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/2047-9158-4-1 · Cited by 212
Gustatory and olfactory dysfunction in older adults: a national probability study
Boesveldt, S., Lindau, S. T., McClintock, M. K., Hummel, T., & Lundstrom, J. N. (2011) · Rhinology journal · doi:10.4193/rhino10.155 · Cited by 142
“5%) and therefore not a sensitive indicator of objective olfactory impairment(14).”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-11-13
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2307
- ISSN
- 0098-7484
- Cited by
- 953
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.288.18.2307
- The paper
- Murphy, C. (2002). Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.18.2307