The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Trends in Disability and Functioning Among Older Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review
Abstract
CONTEXT: Several well-publicized recent studies have suggested that disability among older Americans has declined in the last decade. OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality, quantity, and consistency of recent evidence on US trends in the prevalence of self-rated old age disability and physical, cognitive, and sensory limitations during the late 1980s and 1990s and to evaluate the evidence on trends in disparities by major demographic groups. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE and AGELINE for relevant articles published from January 1990 through May 2002 and reviewed reference lists in published articles. STUDY SELECTION: From more than 800 titles reviewed, we selected 16 articles based on 8 unique repeat cross-sectional and cohort surveys of US prevalence trends in disability or functioning among persons generally aged 65 or 70 years or older. DATA EXTRACTION: We evaluated survey quality according to 10 criteria, ranked the surveys as good, fair, or poor, and calculated for each outcome the average annual percent change. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 8 surveys, 2 were rated as good, 4 as fair, 1 as poor, and 1 as mixed (fair or poor, depending on the outcome) for assessing trends. Analyses of surveys rated fair or good showed consistency of declines in any disability (-1.55% to -0.92% per year), instrumental activities of daily living disability (-2.74% to -0.40% per year), and functional limitations. Surveys provided limited evidence on cognition and conflicting evidence on self-reported ADL (changes ranged from -1.38% to 1.53% per year) and vision trends. Evidence on trends in disparities by age, sex, race, and education was limited and mixed, with no consensus yet emerging. CONCLUSIONS: Several measures of old age disability and limitations have shown improvements in the last decade. Research into the causes of these improvements is needed to understand the implications for the future demand for medical care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Assessment of Older People: Self-Maintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/9.3_part_1.179 · Cited by 18,540
Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity
Fries, J. F. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198007173030304 · Cited by 3,356
Singer, B. H., & Manton, K. G. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.26.15618 · Cited by 162
Cited by
Ageing populations: the challenges ahead
Christensen, K., Doblhammer, G., Rau, R., & Vaupel, J. W. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61460-4 · Cited by 3,011
Trajectories of disability in the last year of life
Gill, T. M., Gahbauer, E. A., Han, L., & Allore, H. G. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0909087 · Cited by 894
Zeng, Y., Feng, Q., Hesketh, T., Christensen, K., & Vaupel, J. W. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30548-2 · Cited by 837
Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Scope, and Impact of Spinal Pain
Manchikanti, L. (2009) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2009/12/e35 · Cited by 721
Mortality and Morbidity Trends: Is There Compression of Morbidity?
Crimmins, E. M., & Beltran-Sanchez, H. (2011) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbq088 · Cited by 694
Metadata
- Authors
- Freedman, V. A., Martin, L. G., & Schoeni, R. F.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-12-25
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3137
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1986368888
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 31.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Trends in Disability and Functioning Among Older Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.288.24.3137
- The paper
- Freedman, V. A., Martin, L. G., & Schoeni, R. F. (2002). Recent Trends in Disability and Functioning Among Older Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.24.3137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.