CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,735Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fluoxetine, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, and Their Combination for Adolescents With Depression: Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) Team·2004·JAMA
DOI 10.1001/jama.292.7.807
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

CONTEXT: Initial treatment of major depressive disorder in adolescents may include cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). However, little is known about their relative or combined effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of 4 treatments among adolescents with major depressive disorder. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial of a volunteer sample of 439 patients between the ages of 12 to 17 years with a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The trial was conducted at 13 US academic and community clinics between spring 2000 and summer 2003. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve weeks of (1) fluoxetine alone (10 to 40 mg/d), (2) CBT alone, (3) CBT with fluoxetine (10 to 40 mg/d), or (4) placebo (equivalent to 10 to 40 mg/d). Placebo and fluoxetine alone were administered double-blind; CBT alone and CBT with fluoxetine were administered unblinded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised total score and, for responder analysis, a (dichotomized) Clinical Global Impressions improvement score. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, the combination of fluoxetine with CBT was statistically significant (P =.001) on the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised. Compared with fluoxetine alone (P =.02) and CBT alone (P =.01), treatment of fluoxetine with CBT was superior. Fluoxetine alone is a superior treatment to CBT alone (P =.01). Rates of response for fluoxetine with CBT were 71.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62%-80%); fluoxetine alone, 60.6% (95% CI, 51%-70%); CBT alone, 43.2% (95% CI, 34%-52%); and placebo, 34.8% (95% CI, 26%-44%). On the Clinical Global Impressions improvement responder analysis, the 2 fluoxetine-containing conditions were statistically superior to CBT and to placebo. Clinically significant suicidal thinking, which was present in 29% of the sample at baseline, improved significantly in all 4 treatment groups. Fluoxetine with CBT showed the greatest reduction (P =.02). Seven (1.6%) of 439 patients attempted suicide; there were no completed suicides. CONCLUSION: The combination of fluoxetine with CBT offered the most favorable tradeoff between benefit and risk for adolescents with major depressive disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.292.7.807

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Essau C, Dobson K. Epidemiology of depressive dis- orders. In: Essau C, Petermann F, eds. Depressive Dis- orders in Children and Adolescents: Epidemiology, Course and Treatment. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aron- son Inc; 1999:69-103.
  2. Emslie GJ, Heiligenstein JH, Wagner KD, et al. Fluoxetine for acute treatment of depression in chil- dren and adolescents: a placebo-controlled, random- ized clinical trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychia- try. 2002;41:1205-1215.
  3. Friedman MA, Detweiler JB, Leventhal HE, Horne R, Keitner G, Miller IW. Combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for the treatment of major depres- sion. Clin Psychol Sci Prac. 2004;11:47-68.
  4. Pamplona S, Bollini P, Gibaldi G, Kupelnick B, Mu- nizza C. Combined pharmacotherapy and psychologi- cal treatment for depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:714-719.
  5. March J, Wells K. Combining medication and psy- chotherapy. In: Martin A, Scahill L, Charney DS, Leck- man JF, eds. Pediatric Psychopharmacology: Prin- ciples and Practice. London, England: Oxford University Press; 2003:326-346.
  6. Clarke G, Lewinshoh P, Hops H. Instructor's Manual for the Adolescent Coping With Depression Course. 4th ed. Eugene, Oregon: Castalia Press; 1990.
  7. Weinfert K. Repeated measures analyses: ANOVA, MANOVA, HLM. In: Grimm L, Yarnold P, eds. Read- ing and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Press; 2000: 317-362.
  8. Gueorguieva R, Krystal JH. Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of Gen- eral Psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:310- 317.
  9. Shea MT, Elkin I, Imber SD, et al. Course of de- pressive symptoms over follow-up: findings from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of De- pression Collaborative Research Program. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:782-787.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,004

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) Team
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) Team
Venue
JAMA
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2004-08-18
Volume
292
Issue
7
Pages
807
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
DOI
10.1001/jama.292.7.807
OpenAlex
W2254051562
Cited by
1,735
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 92
FWCI
81.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • National Institutes of Health (98DS-0008)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
fluoxetine, cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescent depression, major depressive disorder, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, combination therapy, treatment response, suicidal ideation, Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised, clinical global impression, placebo response, medication adherence, relapse prevention, psychoeducation, psychotherapy dropout
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Combined Modality Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk, Suicide, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review