Cited by 711Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition and Health StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

A reduced dietary questionnaire: development and validation

Block, Gladys, Hartman, Anne M., Naughton, Darlene·1990·Epidemiology

Abstract

A reduced questionnaire was developed by successively omitting segments of the full (98-item) Block questionnaire and calculating the correlations between nutrient estimates produced by the full and reduced versions. The reduced version contains 60 food items and requires 17 minutes to administer by an interviewer. It is intended to capture all nutrients in the diet, as is the full version. The reduced version was validated against three four-day records in a group of middle-aged women, and against two seven-day records collected 10-15 years ago in a group of older men. The absolute value of macronutrients estimated by the reduced questionnaire was lower than food-record estimates, but most micronutrients were not underestimated. For macronutrients correlations with food records were slightly lower with the reduced questionnaire, but for micronutrients there was only slight or no reduction in correlations as a result of using the reduced version. The brief version may be useful in studies that cannot allow the 30-35 minutes required for the full-length questionnaire.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00013

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Block Food Frequency Questionnaire estimates customary intake of diverse nutrients and food groups, with item content developed from NHANES 1999-2002 dietary recall data.

    “This instrument estimates customary intake of diverse nutrients and food groups, with item content developed from the NHANES 1999 -2002 dietary recall data (37,38).”

    From Social jetlag, chronotype, and cardiometabolic risk (2015) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Block, G., Hartman, A. M., & Naughton, D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Epidemiology
Published
1990-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
58-64
ISSN
1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008419967
Cited by
711
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 35
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
dietary questionnaire, questionnaire reduction, dietary assessment, food diary, macronutrient intake, micronutrient intake, questionnaire validation, middle-aged women, older men
MeSH terms
Aged, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fats, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, Restaurants, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review