Cited by 556Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Sex Differences in Blood Pressure Trajectories Over the Life Course

Open access
Ji, Hongwei, Kim, Andy, Ebinger, Joseph E., Niiranen, Teemu J., Claggett, Brian L., Bairey Merz, C. Noel, Cheng, Susan·2020·JAMA Cardiology

Abstract

Importance: If we assume that women and men exhibit variations of the same fundamental vascular physiology, then conventional analyses of subclinical measures would suggest that women catch up to men by midlife in the extent of potentially important vascular disease. Alternatively, under the assumption that vascular physiology may fundamentally differ between women and men, a sex-specific analysis of existing data could offer new insights and augment our understanding of sex differences in cardiovascular diseases. Objective: To evaluate whether longitudinal patterns of blood pressure (BP) elevation differ between women and men during the life course when considering baseline BP levels as the reference. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted sex-specific analyses of longitudinal BP measures (144 599 observations) collected for a period of 43 years (1971 to 2014) in 4 community-based US cohort studies. The combined total included 32 833 participants (54% female) spanning ages 5 to 98 years. Data were analyzed between May 4, 2019, and August 5, 2019. Exposures: Age and serially assessed longitudinal BP measures: systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse pressure (PP). Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex-specific change in each primary BP measure compared with baseline BP levels, derived from multilevel longitudinal models fitted over the age span, and new-onset cardiovascular disease events. Results: Of the 32 833 participants, 17 733 were women (54%). Women compared with men exhibited a steeper increase in BP that began as early as in the third decade and continued through the life course (likelihood ratio test χ2 = 531 for systolic BP; χ2 = 123 for diastolic BP; χ2 = 325 for MAP; and χ2 = 572 for PP; P for all <.001). After adjustment for multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors, these between-sex differences in all BP trajectories persisted (likelihood ratio test χ2 = 314 for systolic BP; χ2 = 31 for diastolic BP; χ2 = 129 for MAP; and χ2 = 485 for PP; P for all <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: In contrast with the notion that important vascular disease processes in women lag behind men by 10 to 20 years, sex-specific analyses indicate that BP measures actually progress more rapidly in women than in men, beginning early in life. This early-onset sexual dimorphism may set the stage for later-life cardiovascular diseases that tend to present differently, not simply later, in women compared with men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5306

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systolic BP varies by sex.

    “We required participants to have 1 or more assessments of cognition and 1 or more measurements of blood pressure (BP) at or before the first measurement of cognition because BP is a risk factor for cognitive decline11,18 and varies by sex.18,19”

    From Sex differences in cognitive decline among US adults (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Dean J, Cruz SD, Mehta PK, Merz CN. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: sex-specific risk, diagnosis, and therapy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12(7): 406-414. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2015. · DOI
  2. Eaton CB, Pettinger M, Rossouw J, et al. Risk factors for incident hospitalized heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in a multiracial cohort of postmenopausal women. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(10):e002883. doi:10.1161/ CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002883 · DOI
  3. Beale AL, Meyer P, Marwick TH, Lam CSP, Kaye DM. Sex differences in cardiovascular pathophysiology: why women are overrepresented in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2018;138(2):198-205. doi:10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034271 · DOI
  4. Cheng S, Xanthakis V, Sullivan LM, Vasan RS. Blood pressure tracking over the adult life course: patterns and correlates in the Framingham heart study. Hypertension. 2012;60(6):1393-1399. doi:10. 1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.201780 · DOI
  5. Daubert MA, Douglas PS. Primary prevention of heart failure in women. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7(3): 181-191. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2019.01.011 · DOI
  6. The ARIC investigators. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(4):687-702. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115184 · DOI
  7. Yano Y, Reis JP, Tedla YG, et al. Racial differences in associations of blood pressure components in young adulthood with incident cardiovascular disease by middle age: Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(4):381-389. doi:10.1001/ jamacardio.2016.5678 · DOI
  8. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, et al. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(9):871-881. doi:10.1093/aje/kwf113 · DOI · Paper page
  9. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet. 1990;336(8729): 1465-1468. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)93177-Q · DOI
  10. Ni H, Wu C, Prineas R, et al. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study. Am J Hypertens. 2006;19(4):353-360. doi:10.1016/j. amjhyper.2005.10.020 · DOI
  11. Jacobs DR Jr, Yatsuya H, Hearst MO, et al. Rate of decline of forced vital capacity predicts future arterial hypertension: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. Hypertension. 2012;59(2):219-225. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA. 111.184101 · DOI
  12. Tobin MD, Sheehan NA, Scurrah KJ, Burton PR. Adjusting for treatment effects in studies of quantitative traits: antihypertensive therapy and systolic blood pressure. Stat Med. 2005;24(19):2911-2935. doi:10.1002/sim.2165 · DOI
  13. Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK, Bestwick JP, Wald NJ. Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: meta-analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):290-300. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.038 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Wu J, Kraja AT, Oberman A, et al. A summary of the effects of antihypertensive medications on measured blood pressure. Am J Hypertens. 2005; 18(7):935-942. doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005. 01.011 · DOI
  15. Feinstein M, Ning H, Kang J, Bertoni A, Carnethon M, Lloyd-Jones DM. Racial differences in risks for first cardiovascular events and noncardiovascular death: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, the Cardiovascular Health Study, and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2012;126(1):50-59. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 111.057232 · DOI
  16. Vasan RS, Short MI, Niiranen TJ, et al. Interrelations between arterial stiffness, target organ damage, and cardiovascular disease outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(14):e012141. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.012141 · DOI
  17. Wills AK, Lawlor DA, Matthews FE, et al. Life course trajectories of systolic blood pressure using longitudinal data from eight UK cohorts. PLoS Med. 2011;8(6):e1000440. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed. 1000440 · DOI
  18. Shen W, Zhang T, Li S, et al. Race and sex differences of long-term blood pressure profiles from childhood and adult hypertension: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Hypertension. 2017;70(1): 66-74. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117. 09537 · DOI
  19. Naqvi S, Godfrey AK, Hughes JF, Goodheart ML, Mitchell RN, Page DC. Conservation, acquisition, and functional impact of sex-biased gene expression in mammals. Science. 2019;365(6450):eaaw7317. doi:10.1126/science. aaw7317 · DOI
  20. Heise L, Greene ME, Opper N, et al; Gender Equality, Norms, and Health Steering Committee. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. Lancet. 2019;393 (10189):2440-2454. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19) 30652-X · DOI · Paper page
  21. Arnold AP, Cassis LA, Eghbali M, Reue K, Sandberg K. Sex hormones and sex chromosomes cause sex differences in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(5):746-756. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.116. 307301 · DOI
  22. Gaillard R, Steegers EA, Tiemeier H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Placental vascular dysfunction, fetal and childhood growth, and cardiovascular development: the generation R study. Circulation. 2013;128(20):2202-2210. doi:10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003881 · DOI
  23. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014. 10.003 · DOI
  24. Dickerson JA, Nagaraja HN, Raman SV. Gender-related differences in coronary artery dimensions: a volumetric analysis. Clin Cardiol. 2010;33(2):E44-E49. doi:10.1002/clc.20509 · DOI
  25. Rizzoni D, Agabiti-Rosei C, Agabiti-Rosei E. Hemodynamic consequences of changes in microvascular structure. Am J Hypertens. 2017;30 (10):939-946. doi:10.1093/ajh/hpx032 · DOI
  26. Weber T, Wassertheurer S, O'Rourke MF, et al. Pulsatile hemodynamics in patients with exertional dyspnea: potentially of value in the diagnostic evaluation of suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(18):1874-1883. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013. 02.013 · DOI
  27. Guzik TJ, Touyz RM. Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Vascular Aging in Hypertension. Hypertension. 2017;70(4):660-667. doi:10.1161/ HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.07802 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ji, H., Kim, A., Ebinger, J. E., Niiranen, T. J., Claggett, B. L., Bairey Merz, C. N., & Cheng, S.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
Corresponding author
Cheng, Susan
Venue
JAMA Cardiology
Published
2020-03-01
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
255
ISSN
2380-6583 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999981125
Cited by
556
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 32
FWCI
38.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • WOS
Funders
  • Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hv068162-009, UL1TR000124, n01hv068163-006)
  • National Institute on Aging (R03AG032631)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HV68162, N01HV68163, R01HL143227, R01HL134168, R01HL090957, U01HL064914, R01HL131532)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000425)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
sex differences, blood pressure trajectories, life course, women, men, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, cardiovascular risk, vascular aging, cardiovascular disease incidence, sex-specific analysis, community-based cohort study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review