Cited by 191melanin and skin pigmentationSkin Protection and AgingCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Accuracy of Self-report in Assessing Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes I Through VI

Eilers, Steven, Bach, Daniel Q., Gaber, Rikki, Blatt, Hanz, Guevara, Yanina, Nitsche, Katie, Kundu, Roopal V., Robinson, June K.·2013·JAMA Dermatology

Abstract

Importance Determining Fitzpatrick skin phototypes (FST) allows physicians to assess a person's risk of developing sunburn and, by extension, the need for sun protection to prevent the development of skin cancer. Reflectance spectrophotometry objectively measures the melanin index and can assist in determining the accuracy of self-report of FST compared with dermatologist-determined FST. Objectives To assess whether self-reported or dermatologist-determined FST is more accurate in identifying a participant's FST for FST I through VI and to assess the relevance of the burning and tanning measures for a range of skin types among ethnically diverse participants. Design and setting A convenience sample of participants in an observational study from June 2, 2010, through December 15, 2010, at an ambulatory academic dermatologic practice and employee health center in an urban city. Participants Participants, staff, and students of Northwestern University, who self-identified as being non-Hispanic white, Hispanic or Latino, Asian or Pacific Islander, or black. Main outcomes and measures Melanin index as measured with reflectance spectrophotometry compared with dermatologist- and participant-determined FST. Results Forty-two percent (114 of 270) of the participants' responses to the burning and tanning questions could not be classified using standard FST definitions. The spectrophotometry measurements for dermatologist-determined FST were significantly different for FST III and IV (P…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6101

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eilers, S., Bach, D. Q., Gaber, R., Blatt, H., Guevara, Y., Nitsche, K., Kundu, R. V., & Robinson, J. K.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
JAMA Dermatology
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
149
Issue
11
Pages
1289
ISSN
2168-6068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982770101
Cited by
191
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30AR057216)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
Fitzpatrick skin type, self-report accuracy, reflectance spectrophotometry, melanin index, sunburn risk, sun protection, skin cancer prevention, skin of color, ethnic diversity, skin type classification, sun protection behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ethnicity, Humans, Melanins, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Skin Neoplasms, Skin Pigmentation, Spectrophotometry, Sunlight, Reproducibility of Results, Skin Irritancy Tests, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review