Cited by 29melanin and skin pigmentationSkin Protection and AgingCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

A review of melanin sensor devices

Open access
Kanellis, Vangelis George·2019·Biophysical Reviews

Abstract

Knowing how readily the skin produces melanin is invaluable in reducing photochemical and phototherapy overtreatment in dermatology and also in reducing the risk of actinic skin damage and skin cancer from excessive radiant light exposure. The commonly used Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) classification scale is often used to subjectively assess ultraviolet light sensitivity and susceptibility to sunburn following significant sunlight exposure. However, the FST scale falls short in the assessment of nonwhite skin types. Alternatively, commercially available melanin sensor devices, called melanometers, can be used to objectively quantify useful skin parameters such as the epidermal melanin concentration (EMC). This study reviews commercially available melanometers and their use in quantifying epidermal melanin concentration (EMC) and the individual maximum safe radiant exposure (IMSRE) for an individual in clinical, workplace and community settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12551-019-00581-8

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Fitzpatrick skin type scale is unreliable for darker skin, does not take into account skin color ranges, and does not accurately provide skin cancer risk, leading to healthcare disparities.

    “The FST scale has been found to be unreliable for darker skin, not taking into account skin color ranges nor accurately providing skin cancer risk, ultimately leading to healthcare disparities.13,14”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. ep12471764 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanellis, V. G.
Affiliations
Canberra Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Kanellis, Vangelis George
Venue
Biophysical Reviews
Published
2019-08-08
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
843-849
ISSN
  • 1867-2450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-2469
OpenAlex
W2967715215
Cited by
29
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
UV sensitivity, sunburn susceptibility, actinic skin damage, skin cancer prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review