Cited by 79Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Impact of an Intensive Care Unit Telemedicine Program on Patient Outcomes in an Integrated Health Care System

Open access
Nassar, Boulos S., Vaughan-Sarrazin, Mary S., Jiang, Lan, Reisinger, Heather S., Bonello, Robert, Cram, Peter·2014·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Intensive care unit (ICU) telemedicine (TM) programs have been promoted as improving access to intensive care specialists and ultimately improving patient outcomes, but data on effectiveness are limited and conflicting. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of ICU TM on mortality rates and length of stay (LOS) in an integrated health care system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational pre-post study of patients treated in 8 "intervention" ICUs (7 hospitals within the US Department of Veterans Affairs health care system) during 2011-2012 that implemented TM monitoring during the post-TM period as well as patients treated in concurrent control ICUs that did not implement an ICU TM program. INTERVENTION: Implementation of ICU TM monitoring. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Unadjusted and risk-adjusted ICU, in-hospital, and 30-day mortality rates and ICU and hospital LOS for patients who did or did not receive treatment in ICUs equipped with TM monitoring. RESULTS: Our study included 3355 patients treated in our intervention ICUs (1708 in the pre-TM period and 1647 in the post-TM period) and 3584 treated in the control ICUs during the same period. Patient demographics and comorbid illnesses were similar in the intervention and control ICUs during the pre-TM and post-TM periods; however, predicted ICU mortality rates were modestly lower for admissions to the intervention ICUs compared with control ICUs in both the pre-TM (3.0% vs 3.6%; P = .02) and post-TM (2.8% vs 3.5%; P < .001) periods. Implementation of ICU TM was not associated with a significant decline in ICU, in-hospital, or 30-day mortality rates or LOS in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. For example, unadjusted ICU mortality in the pre-TM vs post-TM periods were 2.9% vs 2.8% (P = .89) for the intervention ICUs and 4.0% vs 3.4% (P = .31) for the control ICUs. Unadjusted 30-day mortality during the pre-TM vs post-TM periods were 7.7% vs 7.8% (P = .91) for the intervention ICUs and 12.0% vs 10.2% (P = .08) for the control ICUs. Evaluation of interaction terms comparing the magnitude of mortality rate change during the pre-TM and post-TM periods in the intervention and control ICUs failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in mortality rates or LOS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We found no evidence that the implementation of ICU TM significantly reduced mortality rates or LOS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1503

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nassar, B. S., Vaughan-Sarrazin, M. S., Jiang, L., Reisinger, H. S., Bonello, R., & Cram, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa3Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City
  • Iowa City VA Health Care System (US)
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
  • Minneapolis VA Health Care System (US)
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
174
Issue
7
Pages
1160
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090373984
Cited by
79
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 HX000261)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K24AR062133, AR062133)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
intensive care monitoring, mortality, length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, integrated health system, veterans, remote patient monitoring, risk adjustment, hospital readmission
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Telemedicine, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review