Cited by 218Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Telemonitoring in Older Adults With Multiple Health Issues to Prevent Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits

Open access
Takahashi, Paul Y., Pecina, Jennifer L., Upatising, Benjavan, Chaudhry, Rajeev, Shah, Nilay D., Van Houten, Holly, Cha, Steve, Croghan, Ivana +2 more·2012·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efficiently caring for frail older adults will become an increasingly important part of health care reform;telemonitoring within homes may be an answer to improve outcomes. This study sought to assess differences in hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits among older adults using telemonitoring vs usual care. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed among adults older than 60 years at high risk for rehospitalization. Participants were randomized to telemonitoring (with daily input) or to patient-driven usual care. Telemonitoring was accomplished by daily biometrics,symptom reporting, and videoconference. The primary outcome was a composite end point of hospitalizations and ED visits in the 12 months following enrollment. Secondary end points included hospitalizations,ED visits, and total hospital days. Intent-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: Two hundred five participants were enrolled,with a mean age of 80.3 years. The primary outcome of hospitalizations and ED visits did not differ between the telemonitoring group (63.7%) and the usual care group(57.3%) (P=.35). No differences were observed in secondary end points, including hospitalizations, ED visits,and total hospital days. No significant group differences in hospitalizations and ED visits were found between the pre-enrollment period vs the post-enrollment period. Mortality was higher in the telemonitoring group (14.7%)than in the usual care group (3.9%) (P=.008). CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients, telemonitoring did not result in fewer hospitalizations or ED visits. Secondary outcomes demonstrated no significant differences between the telemonitoring group and the usual care group.The cause of greater mortality in the telemonitoring group is unknown.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.256

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, P. Y., Pecina, J. L., Upatising, B., Chaudhry, R., Shah, N. D., Van Houten, H., Cha, S., Croghan, I., Naessens, J. M., & Hanson, G. J.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2012-05-28
Volume
172
Issue
10
Pages
773-9
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106643870
Cited by
218
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 19
FWCI
29.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024150)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, frail elderly, hospitalization prevention, emergency department visits, hospital readmission, mortality, biometric monitoring, videoconferencing, usual care
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Patient Readmission, Quality Control, Geriatric Assessment, Survival Analysis, Frail Elderly, Cost Savings, Hospital Mortality, Telemedicine, Statistics, Nonparametric, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review