Cited by 86Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Impact of Telemedicine on Mortality, Length of Stay, and Cost Among Patients in Progressive Care Units: Experience From a Large Healthcare System*

Open access
Armaignac, Donna Lee, Saxena, Anshul, Rubens, Muni, Valle, Carlos A., Williams, Lisa-Mae S., Veledar, Emir, Gidel, Louis T.·2018·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether Telemedicine intervention can affect hospital mortality, length of stay, and direct costs for progressive care unit patients. Design: Retrospective observational. Setting: Large healthcare system in Florida. Patients: Adult patients admitted to progressive care unit (PCU) as their primary admission between December 2011 and August 2016 (n = 16,091). Interventions: Progressive care unit patients with telemedicine intervention (telemedicine PCU [TPCU]; n = 8091) and without telemedicine control (nontelemedicine PCU [NTPCU]; n = 8000) were compared concurrently during study period. Measurements and Main Results: Primary outcome was progressive care unit and hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay, progressive care unit length of stay, and mean direct costs. The mean age NTPCU and TPCU patients were 63.4 years (95% CI, 62.9–63.8 yr) and 71.1 years (95% CI, 70.7–71.4 yr), respectively. All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group Disease Severity (p < 0.0001) and All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group patient Risk of Mortality (p < 0.0001) scores were significantly higher among TPCU versus NTPCU. After adjusting for age, sex, race, disease severity, risk of mortality, hospital entity, and organ systems, TPCU survival benefit was 20%. Mean progressive care unit length of stay was lower among TPCU compared with NTPCU (2.6 vs 3.2 d; p < 0.0001). Postprogressive care unit hospital length of stay was longer for TPCU patients, compared with NTPCU (7.3 vs 6.8 d; p < 0.0001). The overall mean direct cost was higher for TPCU ($13,180), compared with NTPCU ($12,301; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Although there are many studies about the effects of telemedicine in ICU, currently there are no studies on the effects of telemedicine in progressive care unit settings. Our study showed that TPCU intervention significantly decreased mortality in progressive care unit and hospital and progressive care unit length of stay despite the fact patients in TPCU were older and had higher disease severity, and risk of mortality. Increased postprogressive care unit hospital length of stay and total mean direct costs inclusive of telemedicine costs coincided with improved survival rates. Telemedicine intervention decreased overall mortality and length of stay within progressive care units without substantial cost incurrences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002994

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armaignac, D. L., Saxena, A., Rubens, M., Valle, C. A., Williams, L.-M. S., Veledar, E., & Gidel, L. T.
Affiliations
Baptist Health South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Armaignac, Donna Lee
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2018-05
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
728-735
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2786030699
Cited by
86
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Scholarly Commons - Baptist Health South Florida (Baptist Health South Florida) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Scholarly Commons - Baptist Health South Florida (Baptist Health South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
telemedicine, progressive care unit, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, patient survival, hospital readmission, nosocomial infections
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Progressive Patient Care, Retrospective Studies, Hospital Mortality, Telemedicine, Hospital Costs, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review