Cited by 152Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Management and Opioid Use

Association Between Psychological Interventions and Chronic Pain Outcomes in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Open access
Niknejad, Bahar, Bolier, Ruth, Henderson, Charles R., Delgado, Diana, Kozlov, Elissa, Löckenhoff, Corinna E., Reid, M. Carrington·2018·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

Importance: Chronic noncancer pain (hereafter referred to as chronic pain) is common among older adults and managed frequently with pharmacotherapies that produce suboptimal outcomes. Psychological treatments are recommended, but little information is available regarding their efficacy in older adults. Objective: To determine the efficacy of psychological interventions in older adults with chronic pain and whether treatment effects vary by participant, intervention, and study characteristics. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 29, 2017. Study Selection: Analysis included studies that (1) used a randomized trial design, (2) evaluated a psychological intervention that used cognitive behavioral modalities alone or in combination with another strategy, (3) enrolled individuals with chronic pain (pain ≥3 months) with a sample mean age of 60 years or older, and (4) reported preintervention and postintervention quantitative data. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two of the authors independently extracted data. A mixed-model meta-analysis tested the effects of treatment on outcomes. Analyses were performed to investigate the association between participant (eg, age), intervention (eg, treatment mode delivery), and study (eg, methodologic quality) characteristics with outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pain intensity was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, catastrophizing beliefs, self-efficacy for managing pain, physical function, and physical health. Results: Twenty-two studies with 2608 participants (1799 [69.0%] women) were analyzed. Participants' mean (SD) age was 71.9 (7.1) years. Differences of standardized mean differences (dD) at posttreatment were pain intensity (dD = -0.181, P = .006), pain interference (dD = -0.133, P = .12), depressive symptoms (dD = -0.128, P = .14), anxiety (dD = -0.205, P = .09), catastrophizing beliefs (dD = -0.184, P = .046), self-efficacy (dD = 0.193, P = .02), physical function (dD = 0.006, P = .96), and physical health (dD = 0.160, P = .24). There was evidence of effects persisting beyond the posttreatment assessment only for pain (dD = -0.251, P = .002). In moderator analyses, only mode of therapy (group vs individual) demonstrated a consistent effect in favor of group-based therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: Psychological interventions for the treatment of chronic pain in older adults have small benefits, including reducing pain and catastrophizing beliefs and improving pain self-efficacy for managing pain. These results were strongest when delivered using group-based approaches. Research is needed to develop and test strategies that enhance the efficacy of psychological approaches and sustainability of treatment effects among older adults with chronic pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0756

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies of trauma-focused psychotherapies have focused on behavioural health outcomes such as PTSD symptomology, depression or anxiety.

    “most studies of trauma-focused psychotherapies have focused on behavioural health outcomes such as PTSD symptomology, depression or anxiety [26,27].”

    From Health care utilisation changes among Alaska Native adults after participation in an indigenous community programme to address adverse life experiences: a propensity score-matched analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Methods sections on Eligibility Criteria and Outcomes (page numbers unavailable) describe CBT-based studies of chronic pain in older adults and include depression and anxiety among the outcomes assessed. Our copy does not address trauma-focused psychotherapy, PTSD outcomes, or whether most studies in that field focus on behavioural health outcomes (searched: trauma-focused psychotherapy and posttraumatic stress disorder). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]BMJ Clinical Evidence. Study design search filters. http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/x/set/static/ebm/learn/665076.html. Updated 9 20, 2012 Accessed August 23, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niknejad, B., Bolier, R., Henderson, C. R., Delgado, D., Kozlov, E., Löckenhoff, C. E., & Reid, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Reid, M. Carrington
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2018-06-01
Volume
178
Issue
6
Pages
830
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800336802
Cited by
152
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • California Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (T32AG049666, K24AG053462, P30AG022845)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
chronic non-cancer pain, older adults, psychological intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, pain intensity, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, pain self-efficacy, physical function, treatment effects, treatment moderators, treatment effect heterogeneity, treatment acceptability, methodological quality, physical health
MeSH terms
Aged, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review