Cited by 113Probiotics and Fermented FoodsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Probiotic safety—No guarantees

Open access
Cohen, Pieter A.·2018·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

For centuries, people have consumed live bacteria in many foods, such as yogurt, cheese, kimchi, and sauerkraut. The mass-marketing of isolated live bacteria for their purported beneficial or “probiotic” properties, however, is a relatively recent phenomenon. The World Health Organization defines probiotics as “live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host.” Yet to be sold as a probiotic supplement in the United States, a live microorganism does not require evidence of efficacy or even safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5403

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accurate data on the incidence of infections associated with probiotic use remain unknown.

    “Despite the large number of clinical observations regarding the use of probiotics, accurate data on the incidence of infections associated with their use remain unknown [77].”

    From Current Concepts in Probiotic Safety and Efficacy (2026) · cites this paper as [77]

  • The presence of such ARGs and VFs may have clinical relevance, particularly in immunocompromised individuals or those with disrupted gut barriers, where opportunities for opportunistic infection or horizontal gene transfer may be increased.

    “The presence of such ARGs and VFs may have clinical relevance, particularly in immunocompromised individuals or those with disrupted gut barriers, where opportunities for opportunistic infection or horizontal gene transfer may be increased.22,29-35”
  • Products like Tufpro, Ecogro, and Progermila bambini have contained opportunistic pathogens such as Bacillus cereus, Acinetobacter spp., and Pseudomonas spp.

    “Products like Tufpro, Ecogro, and Progermila bambini have contained opportunistic pathogens such as Bacillus cereus, Acinetobacter spp., and Pseudomonas spp.30”
  • Probiotic-borne AR genes could be transferred to resident potential pathogens, other microbes harbored by the host, and/or environmental microbes, thereby increasing the ecological pool of antimicrobial resistance genes.

    “one concern is the theoretical situation in which probiotic-borne AR genes could be transferred to resident potential pathogens, other microbes harbored by the host, and/or environmental microbes, thereby increasing the ecological pool of antimicrobial resistance genes.15–17”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

  • In general, high quality, safe probiotic products are produced under dietary supplement and food regulations, although there have been incidences of noncompliance documented for supplements and calls for improved product quality.

    “In general, high quality, safe probiotic products are produced under dietary supplement and food regulations, although there have been incidences of noncompliance documented for supplements15 and calls for improved product quality.135”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, P. A.
Affiliations
Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Pieter A.
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
178
Issue
12
Pages
1577
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892079098
Cited by
113
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic safety, probiotic supplements, live microorganisms, dietary supplements, regulatory oversight, health claims
MeSH terms
Humans, Risk Assessment, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review