Cited by 483Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareAI in cancer detection

Deep Learning in Medicine—Promise, Progress, and Challenges

Wang, Fei, Casalino, Lawrence Peter, Khullar, Dhruv·2019·JAMA Internal Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7117

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OHDSI has consolidated 1.26 billion patient records from 17 different countries.

    “There are various international efforts in gathering EMR data across countries including Observational Health Data Science and Informatics (OHDSI), who have consolidated 1.26 billion patient records from 17 different countries [40].”
  • Modern deep learning models feature millions of parameters that need to be learned from sufficiently large curated data sets in order to achieve clinical-grade accuracy, while being safe, fair, equitable and generalising well to unseen data.

    “Modern DL models feature millions of parameters that need to be learned from sufficiently large curated data sets in order to achieve clinical-grade accuracy, while being safe, fair, equitable and generalising well to unseen data2–5.”

    From The future of digital health with federated learning (2020) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Despite the advantages of federated learning, it does not solve all issues inherent to learning on medical data; successful model training still depends on factors like data quality, bias and standardisation.

    “Despite the advantages of FL, it does not solve all issues that are inherent to learning on medical data.”

    From The future of digital health with federated learning (2020) · cites this paper as [2]

  • Suboptimal quality of clinical data often limits the performance of machine learning algorithms.

    “Suboptimal quality of clinical data often limits the performance of ML algorithms (6,7).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, F., Casalino, L. P., & Khullar, D.
Affiliations
Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2019-03-01
Volume
179
Issue
3
Pages
293
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905483812
Cited by
483
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 15
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
deep learning, artificial intelligence in healthcare, clinical application, AI adoption barriers, diagnostic imaging, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Decision Making, Computer-Assisted, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review