Cited by 512Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare

Aung, Yuri Y M, Wong, David C S, Ting, Daniel S W·2021·British Medical Bulletin

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly evolving fields in various sectors, including healthcare. This article reviews AI's present applications in healthcare, including its benefits, limitations and future scope. SOURCES OF DATA: A review of the English literature was conducted with search terms 'AI' or 'ML' or 'deep learning' and 'healthcare' or 'medicine' using PubMED and Google Scholar from 2000-2021. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: AI could transform physician workflow and patient care through its applications, from assisting physicians and replacing administrative tasks to augmenting medical knowledge. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: From challenges training ML systems to unclear accountability, AI's implementation is difficult and incremental at best. Physicians also lack understanding of what AI implementation could represent. GROWING POINTS: AI can ultimately prove beneficial in healthcare, but requires meticulous governance similar to the governance of physician conduct. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Regulatory guidelines are needed on how to safely implement and assess AI technology, alongside further research into the specific capabilities and limitations of its medical use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bmb/ldab016

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aung, Y. Y. M., Wong, D. C. S., & Ting, D. S. W.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Ting, Daniel S W
Venue
British Medical Bulletin
Published
2021-08-17
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
4-15
ISSN
  • 0007-1420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8391
OpenAlex
W3196012986
Cited by
511
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Medical Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, machine learning, deep learning, physician workflow, administrative automation, AI implementation challenges, accountability, AI governance, regulatory guidelines, AI safety, AI limitations
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review