Cited by 246Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Approval of Aducanumab for Alzheimer Disease—The FDA’s Perspective

Dunn, Billy, Stein, Peter, Cavazzoni, Patrizia·2021·JAMA Internal Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4607

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FDA granted accelerated approval to aducanumab and stated that reduction of amyloid is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit.

    “The FDA has controversially granted accelerated approval to aducanumab and has opined that the reduction of amyloid is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit 7,9,[98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107] .”
  • Aducanumab was given FDA approval under the expedited approval pathway to treat moderate AD.

    “Aducanumab has been given FDA approval under the expedited approval pathway to treat moderate AD [134,135,136].”
  • Lecanemab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody specifically targeting aggregated forms of amyloid beta and was given fast approval by the FDA.

    “Lecanemab (LEQEMBI, brand name), a different monoclonal antibody known as humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1), which specifically targets aggregated forms of amyloid beta, was also given fast approval by the FDA earlier in the year [134,135,136].”
  • Reduction in amyloid-beta brain plaques and encouraging clinical outcomes in one of two pivotal Phase III trials were factors cited for aducanumab's expedited approval.

    “The reduction in amyloid-beta brain plaques, a purported surrogate endpoint that indicates the “progression” of AD, and the encouraging clinical outcomes in one of the two pivotal Phase III trials were two of the factors cited for aducanumab’s expedited approval [130,134,135,136].”
  • Both EMERGE and ENGAGE trials presented evidence of an intermediate effect of aducanumab on biomarkers, indicating amyloid removal, which is likely linked to the clinical benefit of aducanumab.

    “Both trials presented evidence of an intermediate effect of the drug on biomarkers, indicating amyloid removal, which is likely linked to the clinical benefit of aducanumab.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunn, B., Stein, P., & Cavazzoni, P.
Affiliations
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
181
Issue
10
Pages
1276
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3178441362
Cited by
246
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 28
FWCI
29.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
aducanumab, Alzheimer's disease, FDA drug approval, amyloid-beta, anti-amyloid therapy, regulatory decision-making
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Decision Making, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Treatment Outcome, Drug Approval, Nootropic Agents, Positron-Emission Tomography, Plaque, Amyloid, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review