Cited by 252Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Clinical trials of new drugs for Alzheimer disease: a 2020–2023 update

Open access
Huang, Li-Kai, Kuan, Yi-Chun, Lin, Ho-Wei, Hu, Chaur-Jong·2023·Journal of Biomedical Science

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia, presenting a significant unmet medical need worldwide. The pathogenesis of AD involves various pathophysiological events, including the accumulation of amyloid and tau, neuro-inflammation, and neuronal injury. Clinical trials focusing on new drugs for AD were documented in 2020, but subsequent developments have emerged since then. Notably, the US-FDA has approved Aducanumab and Lecanemab, both antibodies targeting amyloid, marking the end of a nearly two-decade period without new AD drugs. In this comprehensive report, we review all trials listed in clinicaltrials.gov, elucidating their underlying mechanisms and study designs. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating numerous promising new drugs for AD. The main trends in these trials involve pathophysiology-based, disease-modifying therapies and the recruitment of participants in earlier stages of the disease. These trends underscore the significance of conducting fundamental research on pathophysiology, prevention, and intervention prior to the occurrence of brain damage caused by AD.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This 2020–2023 update reviews Alzheimer disease drug trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov and highlights the FDA approvals of aducanumab and lecanemab. It finds that trials increasingly focus on disease-modifying anti-amyloid/anti-tau therapies and earlier disease stages, while symptomatic, anti-neuroinflammation, and other approaches remain active.

Key findings

  • The FDA granted accelerated approval to aducanumab in June 2021, accelerated approval to lecanemab on January 6, 2023, and traditional approval to lecanemab on July 6, 2023; donanemab had an application for full approval.
  • In the lecanemab Clarity AD trial, CDR-SB difference was −0.45 (95% CI −0.67 to −0.23), amyloid PET burden difference was −59.1 (95% CI −62.6 to −55.6), ADAS-Cog14 mean difference was −1.44 (95% CI −2.27 to −0.61), ADCOMS mean difference was −0.050 (95% CI −0.074 to −0.027), and ADCS-MCI-ADL mean difference was 2.0 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8); ARIA-E occurred in 12.6% and infusion-related reactions in 26.4%.
  • In TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2, donanemab produced iADRS change of −6.02 vs −9.27 for placebo in the low/medium tau group and −10.2 vs −13.1 in the combined population, with a reported 60% reduction in decline in early-stage AD; ARIA occurred in 24% vs 2.1% and infusion-related reactions in 8.7% vs 0.5%. In TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 4, 38% of donanemab-treated patients vs 2% of aducanumab-treated patients were below the amyloid positivity threshold at 6 months, plasma pTau217 decreased by 25% with donanemab but not with aducanumab, and ARIA-edema occurred in 22% of both groups.
  • The review reports that most trials continue to target amyloid and tau, with a shift toward prodromal/preclinical populations; BIIB080 produced dose-dependent 30%–50% reductions in CSF total tau and pTau181. Among trials newly registered in the last 4 years, four articles from two trials were published, and both trials had overall low risk of bias.

Methods

  • Narrative review/update of Alzheimer disease clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, covering 2020–2023, with tables summarizing ongoing phase 2, phase 3, and phase 4 trials by mechanism.
  • The paper describes trial agents, targets, designs, outcomes, and status; for published results, it identified four articles pertaining to two trials newly registered in the last 4 years and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, version 2.
  • No systematic search, meta-analysis, or pooled effect estimate is described.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state a formal limitations section. Evident from the text: it is a descriptive review relying on ClinicalTrials.gov listings and selected published results, without a systematic search or quantitative synthesis.
  • Many cited trials are ongoing or not yet recruiting, so efficacy and safety results are unavailable; the review notes challenges including limited indications for anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, administration and monitoring costs, need for specialized facilities and imaging, and unmet needs for BPSD and cognitive enhancement.
  • Risk-of-bias assessment was limited to four published articles from two trials; other trial data were not quality-assessed.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12929-023-00976-6

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 50 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial recruited 856 patients with AD with MCI or mild dementia and verified amyloid pathology through amyloid PET or CSF Aβ1-42.

    “A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial recruited 856 patients with AD with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia and verified amyloid pathology through amyloid PET or CSF Aβ1-42 [42].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Swanson CJ, Zhang Y, Dhadda S, Wang J, Kaplow J, Lai RY, et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase 2b proof-of-concept clinical trial in early Alzheimer’s disease with lecanemab, an anti-Aβ protofibril antibody. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13(1):80. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    In TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 4 preliminary results, 38% of patients on donanemab exhibited amyloid levels below the amyloid positivity threshold after 6 months, whereas only 2% of patients on aducanumab had such findings.

    “The preliminary results were presented at the 2022 Clinical Trial of AD (CTAD) conference: 38% of the patients on donanemab exhibited amyloid levels below the amyloid positivity threshold after 6 months, whereas only 2% of the patients on aducanumab has such findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Clarity AD reported favorable outcomes for all primary and secondary measures, including ADAS-Cog14, ADCOMS, and ADCS-MCI-ADL scores.

    “It reported favorable outcomes for all primary and secondary measures, including ADAS-Cog14, AD Composite Score (ADCOMS), and ADCS-MCI-ADL scores [43].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] Van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(1):9–21. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    An exploratory analysis revealed that a subgroup of participants in the ENGAGE trial who received a high dose of aducanumab exhibited slow decline similar to that observed in the EMERGE trial.

    “An exploratory analysis revealed that a subgroup of the participants in the ENGAGE trial who received a high dose of aducanumab exhibited slow decline, which was similar to that observed among the participants in the EMERGE trial.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Dunn B, Stein P, Cavazzoni P. Approval of aducanumab for Alzheimer disease—the FDA’s perspective. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(10):1276–8. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    The US FDA granted traditional approval for Leqembi (lecanemab-irmb) on July 6, 2023, for the treatment of AD, based on Phase 3 data from the Clarity AD clinical trial.

    “On July 6, 2023, Leqembi (lecanemab-irmb) received traditional approval from the US FDA for the treatment of AD based on Phase 3 data from the Clarity AD clinical trial [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] FDA Converts Novel Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment to Traditional Approval-Action Follows Confirmatory Trial to Verify Clinical Benefit. 2023.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • May combine two claims. 18
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Clinical trials of early or preventive interventions based on amyloid/tau theory and those targeting other pathophysiologies are ongoing or have been initiated.

    “Clinical trials of early or preventive interventions based on amyloid/tau theory and those targeting other pathophysiologies are ongoing or have been initiated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The key event in AD pathogenesis is Aβ accumulation.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Donanemab significantly decreased plasma pTau217 by 24% in the treatment group, whereas the placebo group exhibited a 6% increase in plasma pTau217 at the end of the trial.

    “Donanemab reduced the tau burden in the temporal, parietal, and frontal lobes and significantly decreased plasma pTau217 by 24% in the treatment group, whereas the placebo group exhibited a 6% increase in plasma pTau217 at the end of the trial [49].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] Pontecorvo MJ, Lu M, Burnham SC, Schade AE, Dage JL, Shcherbinin S, et al. Association of donanemab treatment with exploratory plasma biomarkers in early symptomatic Alzheimer disease: a secondary analysis of the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(12):1250–9. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Both EMERGE and ENGAGE trials presented evidence of an intermediate effect of aducanumab on biomarkers, indicating amyloid removal, which is likely linked to the clinical benefit of aducanumab.

    “Both trials presented evidence of an intermediate effect of the drug on biomarkers, indicating amyloid removal, which is likely linked to the clinical benefit of aducanumab.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Dunn B, Stein P, Cavazzoni P. Approval of aducanumab for Alzheimer disease—the FDA’s perspective. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(10):1276–8. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The US FDA approved lecanemab on January 6, 2023, through an accelerated approval pathway on the basis of evidence of amyloid removal in a phase 2 trial and because it had a likelihood of having clinical benefits.

    “The US FDA approved it on January 6, 2023, through an accelerated approval pathway on the basis of evidence of amyloid removal in a phase 2 trial (NCT01767311) and because it had a likelihood of having clinical benefits [41]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] Canady VA. FDA approves new treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. Ment Heal Wkly. 2023;33(3):6–7. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 4 preliminary results, plasma pTau217 levels decreased by 25% for participants receiving donanemab, but not at all for those receiving aducanumab.

    “Plasma pTau217 levels decreased by 25% for the participants receiving donanemab, but not at all for those receiving aducanumab.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Clinical trials related to AD have exhibited a shift in focus toward the earlier stages of AD, such as MCI, or even cognitively healthy participants for developing prevention interventions.

    “Clinical trials related to AD have also exhibited a shift in focus toward the earlier stages of AD, such as MCI, or even cognitively healthy participants for developing prevention interventions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The focus of research has shifted toward populations in the prodromal or preclinical stage with positive results for diagnostic biomarkers.

    “This shift in perspective has led to a change in the focus of research toward populations in the prodromal or preclinical stage with positive results for diagnostic biomarkers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The scope of indications for novel anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy remains limited.

    “However, despite this expansion of research areas, the scope of indications for novel anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy remains limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Two articles reported the results of NCT03887455, and the other two reported the results of NCT01760005.

    “Two articles reported the results of NCT03887455 [43, 84], and the other two reported the results of NCT01760005 [53, 83].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [43] Van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(1):9–21. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [84] Tahami Monfared AA, Ye W, Sardesai A, Folse H, Chavan A, Aruffo E, et al. A path to improved Alzheimer’s care: simulating long-term health outcomes of lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease from the CLARITY AD trial. Neurol Ther. 2023;12(3):863–81. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [53] Salloway S, Farlow M, McDade E, Clifford DB, Wang G, Llibre-Guerra JJ, et al. A trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med. 2021;27(7):1187–96. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [83] Bateman RJ, Benzinger TL, Berry S, Clifford DB, Duggan C, Fagan AM, et al. The DIAN-TU Next Generation Alzheimer’s prevention trial: Adaptive design and disease progression model. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(1):8–19. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Findingreasoning

    The field of AD clinical trials is evolving.

    “Overall, the field of AD clinical trials is evolving, and additional promising treatments for AD are likely to be developed in the near future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The articles pertaining to the two trials were published between 2018 and 2023.

    “The articles were published between 2018 and 2023.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Many ongoing clinical trials on AD are focused on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that target the causes and can change the course of AD.

    “Many ongoing clinical trials on AD are focused on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) that target the causes and can change the course of AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The key event in AD pathogenesis is Aβ accumulation.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Donanemab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that recognizes Aβ (3-42), an aggregated form of Aβ found in amyloid plaques.

    “It recognizes Aβ (3–42), an aggregated form of Aβ found in amyloid plaques [46].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] Irizarry MC, Sims JR, Lowe SL, Nakano M, Hawdon A, Willis BA, et al. O4–08-06: Safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and florbetapir F-18 positron emission tomography (PET) after multiple dose administration of LY3002813, a β-amyloid plaque-specific antibody, in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12:P352–3. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Acetylcholine (ACh) plays a vital role in memory function, including memory encoding, consolidation, and retrieval processes.

    “Acetylcholine (ACh) plays a vital role in memory function, including memory encoding, consolidation, and retrieval processes, and increasing Ach levels by using cholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) has become a standard therapy for the symptoms of AD [37].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] Raina P, Santaguida P, Ismaila A, Patterson C, Cowan D, Levine M, et al. Effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for treating dementia: evidence review for a clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(5):379–97. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Increasing Ach levels by using cholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) has become a standard therapy for the symptoms of AD.

    “Acetylcholine (ACh) plays a vital role in memory function, including memory encoding, consolidation, and retrieval processes, and increasing Ach levels by using cholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) has become a standard therapy for the symptoms of AD [37].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] Raina P, Santaguida P, Ismaila A, Patterson C, Cowan D, Levine M, et al. Effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for treating dementia: evidence review for a clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(5):379–97. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aducanumab is a high-affinity, fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to the N-terminus of Aβ fibrils and blocks amyloid aggregation.

    “Aducanumab (brand name: Aduhelm) is a high-affinity, fully human immunoglobulin gamma 1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that binds to the N-terminus of Aβ fibrils and blocks amyloid aggregation [38].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Arndt JW, Qian F, Smith BA, Quan C, Kilambi KP, Bush MW, et al. Structural and kinetic basis for the selectivity of aducanumab for aggregated forms of amyloid-β. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6412. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lecanemab is a humanized IgG1 antibody derived from mAb158 that selectively binds to soluble Aβ protofibrils.

    “Lecanemab (brand name: Leqembi), a humanized IgG1 antibody derived from mAb158, selectively binds to soluble Aβ protofibrils [40].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Tucker S, Möller C, Tegerstedt K, Lord A, Laudon H, Sjödahl J, et al. The murine version of BAN2401 (mAb158) selectively reduces amyloid-β protofibrils in brain and cerebrospinal fluid of tg-ArcSwe mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43(2):575–88. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Other ongoing trials involve symptomatic treatments-for example, enhancing cognitive function and relieving BPSD.

    “The other trials involve symptomatic treatments—for example, enhancing cognitive function and relieving BPSD (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The AURs for lecanemab and aducanumab highlight the importance of patient selection, surveillance for adverse events, and clinician preparedness.

    “The appropriate use recommendations (AURs) for lecanemab and aducanumab highlight the importance of patient selection, surveillance for adverse events, and clinician preparedness [44, 45].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] Cummings J, Rabinovici G, Atri A, Aisen P, Apostolova L, Hendrix S, et al. Aducanumab: appropriate use recommendations update. J Prev Alzheimers Di s. 2022;9(2):221–30.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [45] Cummings J, Apostolova L, Rabinovici G, Atri A, Aisen P, Greenberg S, et al. Lecanemab: appropriate use recommendations. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(3):362–77.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The approval of lecanemab marks a notable advance in clinical approaches to AD treatment, remedying the scarcity of new drugs in the market for nearly two decades.

    “The approval of this treatment not only affirms the pathophysiological significance of amyloid in AD but also marks a notable advance in clinical approaches to AD treatment, remedying the scarcity of new drugs in the market for nearly two decades.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the A4 study, solanezumab did not slow cognitive decline or clear amyloid plaques in individuals with preclinical Alzheimer disease.

    “On March 8, 2023, Eli Lilly and Company reported that solanezumab did not slow cognitive decline or clear amyloid plaques in individuals with preclinical AD in the A4 study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Additional promising treatments for AD are likely to be developed in the near future.

    “Overall, the field of AD clinical trials is evolving, and additional promising treatments for AD are likely to be developed in the near future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Both trials NCT03887455 and NCT01760005 had an overall low risk of bias.

    “Both trials (NCT03887455 and NCT01760005) had a overall low risk of bias [43, 53, 83, 84].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [43] Van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, et al. Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(1):9–21. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [53] Salloway S, Farlow M, McDade E, Clifford DB, Wang G, Llibre-Guerra JJ, et al. A trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med. 2021;27(7):1187–96. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [83] Bateman RJ, Benzinger TL, Berry S, Clifford DB, Duggan C, Fagan AM, et al. The DIAN-TU Next Generation Alzheimer’s prevention trial: Adaptive design and disease progression model. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(1):8–19. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [84] Tahami Monfared AA, Ye W, Sardesai A, Folse H, Chavan A, Aruffo E, et al. A path to improved Alzheimer’s care: simulating long-term health outcomes of lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease from the CLARITY AD trial. Neurol Ther. 2023;12(3):863–81. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The diversity of outcome measurement tools has enabled meaningful improvements in AD and the efficacy of treatments to be clearly determined in clinical trials.

    “Outcome measurement tools have also become more diverse, which has enabled meaningful improvements in AD and the efficacy of treatments to be clearly determined in clinical trials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the DIAN-TU-001 trial, participants were offered an open-label extension with high-dose gantenerumab because of its positive effects on imaging and other biomarkers, such as normalized CSF Aβ42, and because it reduced CSF total tau and pTau181 levels.

    “The participants were offered an open-label extension with high-dose gantenerumab because of its positive effects on imaging and other biomarkers, such as normalized CSF Aβ42, and because it reduced CSF total tau and pTau181 levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the DIAN-TU-001 trial, gantenerumab significantly reduced amyloid plaques, CSF total tau, and phospho-tau181 and attenuated increases in neurofilament light chain.

    “whereas gantenerumab significantly reduced amyloid plaques, CSF total tau, and phospho-tau181 and attenuated increases in neurofilament light chain [53].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] Salloway S, Farlow M, McDade E, Clifford DB, Wang G, Llibre-Guerra JJ, et al. A trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Med. 2021;27(7):1187–96. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    In the ACI-35 phase 1b/2a trial, recipients of JACI-35.054 displayed a robust immune response against ePHF and pTau, but without a clear dose-effect relationship.

    “Recipients of JACI-35.054 also displayed a robust immune response against ePHF and pTau, but without a clear dose–effect relationship.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
27 of 27
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The key event in AD pathogenesis is Aβ accumulation.

    “The key event in AD pathogenesis is believed to be Aβ accumulation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Remternetug is a monoclonal antibody that recognizes a pyroglutamated form of Aβ that aggregates into amyloid plaques.

    “Remternetug is a monoclonal antibody that recognizes a pyroglutamated form of Aβ that aggregates into amyloid plaques.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The validity of the amyloid hypothesis has been contested.

    “Additionally, the validity of the amyloid hypothesis has been contested, resulting in a significant reduction in the number of anti-amyloid phase 3 trials since 2019.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is an unmet clinical need for therapies for symptoms including cognitive enhancers and agents for relieving BPSD.

    “This reflects the unmet clinical need for such therapies (Figs. 2 and 3).”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phase III trials include 48 trials that tested 32 medications.

    “Phase III trials, including 48 trials that tested 32 medications [37,183,184].”
  • Phase II trials include 90 studies and 81 medicines.

    “Phase II trials (90 studies, 81 medicines): these trials continue to investigate the drugs’ safety and efficacy.”
  • Of these trials, 41% look into disease-modifying small molecule medications, 34% look into biological agents that change disease, and the remaining trials focus on treatments that improve cognitive function or address neuropsychiatric symptoms linked to AD.

    “Of these trials, 41% look into disease-modifying small molecule medications, 34% look into biological agents that change disease, and the remaining trials focus on treatments that improve cognitive function or address neuropsychiatric symptoms linked to ADs [68,70,71,182,183,184].”
  • The 2024 AD drug development pipeline includes 164 trials, of which 127 are exploring possible treatments or medicines.

    “The most recent list of studies was provided by the 2024 AD drug development pipeline, which includes 164 trials (of which 127 are exploring possible treatments or medicines).”
  • In Phase I, there are 26 trials assessing 25 agents.

    “In Phase I, there are 26 trials assessing 25 agents.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • ACI-35 is classified as passive immunotherapy but described as a vaccine

    Minor

    Table 4 classifies ACI-35 as passive immunotherapy, while the text describes it as a vaccine that elicits an immune response.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reading CL, Ahlem CN, Murphy MF. NM101 Phase III study of NE3107 in Alzheimer’s disease: rationale, design and therapeutic modulation of neuroinflammation and insulin resistance. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2021;11(4):289–98. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, L.-K., Kuan, Y.-C., Lin, H.-W., & Hu, C.-J.
Affiliations
  • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Taipei Medical University (TW)
Corresponding author
Hu, Chaur-Jong
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Science
Published
2023-10-02
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
83-83
ISSN
  • 1021-7770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0127
OpenAlex
W4387259038
Cited by
252
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 5
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, clinical trials, new drug development, aducanumab, lecanemab, disease-modifying therapy, amyloid accumulation, neuroinflammation, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review