Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Congenital Zika Virus Infection: Beyond Neonatal Microcephaly

Open access
Melo, Adriana Suely de Oliveira, Aguiar, Renato Santana, Amorim, Melania Maria Ramos, Arruda, Monica B., Melo, Fabiana de Oliveira, Ribeiro, Suelem Taís Clementino, Batista, Alba Gean Medeiros, Ferreira, Thales, dos Santos, Mayra Pereira, Sampaio, Virgínia Vilar, Moura, Sarah Rogéria Martins, Rabello, Luciana Portela, Gonzaga, Clarissa Emanuelle, Malinger, Gustavo, Ximenes, Renato, de Oliveira-Szejnfeld, Patricia Soares, Tovar-Moll, Fernanda, Chimelli, Leila, Silveira, Paola Paz, Delvechio, Rodrigo, Higa, Luiza, Campanati, Loraine, Nogueira, Rita M. R., Filippis, Ana Maria Bispo, Szejnfeld, Jacob, Voloch, Carolina Moreira, Ferreira, Orlando C., Brindeiro, Rodrigo M., Tanuri, Amilcar·2016·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Recent studies have reported an increase in the number of fetuses and neonates with microcephaly whose mothers were infected with the Zika virus (ZIKV) during pregnancy. To our knowledge, most reports to date have focused on select aspects of the maternal or fetal infection and fetal effects. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prenatal evolution and perinatal outcomes of 11 neonates who had developmental abnormalities and neurological damage associated with ZIKV infection in Brazil. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We observed 11 infants with congenital ZIKV infection from gestation to 6 months in the state of Paraíba, Brazil. Ten of 11 women included in this study presented with symptoms of ZIKV infection during the first half of pregnancy, and all 11 had laboratory evidence of the infection in several tissues by serology or polymerase chain reaction. Brain damage was confirmed through intrauterine ultrasonography and was complemented by magnetic resonance imaging. Histopathological analysis was performed on the placenta and brain tissue from infants who died. The ZIKV genome was investigated in several tissues and sequenced for further phylogenetic analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Description of the major lesions caused by ZIKV congenital infection. RESULTS: Of the 11 infants, 7 (63.6%) were female, and the median (SD) maternal age at delivery was 25 (6) years. Three of 11 neonates died, giving a perinatal mortality rate of 27.3%. The median (SD) cephalic perimeter at birth was 31 (3) cm, a value lower than the limit to consider a microcephaly case. In all patients, neurological impairments were identified, including microcephaly, a reduction in cerebral volume, ventriculomegaly, cerebellar hypoplasia, lissencephaly with hydrocephalus, and fetal akinesia deformation sequence (ie, arthrogryposis). Results of limited testing for other causes of microcephaly, such as genetic disorders and viral and bacterial infections, were negative, and the ZIKV genome was found in both maternal and neonatal tissues (eg, amniotic fluid, cord blood, placenta, and brain). Phylogenetic analyses showed an intrahost virus variation with some polymorphisms in envelope genes associated with different tissues. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Combined findings from clinical, laboratory, imaging, and pathological examinations provided a more complete picture of the severe damage and developmental abnormalities caused by ZIKV infection than has been previously reported. The term congenital Zika syndrome is preferable to refer to these cases, as microcephaly is just one of the clinical signs of this congenital malformation disorder.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3720

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Melo, A. S. D. O., Aguiar, R. S., Amorim, M. M. R., Arruda, M. B., Melo, F. D. O., Ribeiro, S. T. C., Batista, A. G. M., Ferreira, T., dos Santos, M. P., Sampaio, V. V., Moura, S. R. M., Rabello, L. P., Gonzaga, C. E., Malinger, G., Ximenes, R., de Oliveira-Szejnfeld, P. S., Tovar-Moll, F., Chimelli, L., Silveira, P. P., Delvechio, R., Higa, L., Campanati, L., Nogueira, R. M. R., Filippis, A. M. B., Szejnfeld, J., Voloch, C. M., Ferreira, O. C., Brindeiro, R. M., & Tanuri, A.
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2016-12-01
Volume
73
Issue
12
Pages
1407
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2528733278
Cited by
406
References
3
FWCI
61.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Congenital Zika Virus Infection: Beyond Neonatal Microcephaly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3720
The paper
Melo, A. S. D. O., Aguiar, R. S., Amorim, M. M. R., Arruda, M. B., Melo, F. D. O., Ribeiro, S. T. C., Batista, A. G. M., Ferreira, T., dos Santos, M. P., Sampaio, V. V., Moura, S. R. M., Rabello, L. P., Gonzaga, C. E., Malinger, G., Ximenes, R., de Oliveira-Szejnfeld, P. S., Tovar-Moll, F., Chimelli, L., Silveira, P. P., . . . Tanuri, A. (2016). Congenital Zika Virus Infection: Beyond Neonatal Microcephaly. JAMA Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3720

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.