Cited by 97Mosquito-borne diseases and controlCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionViral Infections and Vectors

Zika virus infection in immunocompetent pregnant mice causes fetal damage and placental pathology in the absence of fetal infection

Open access
Szaba, Frank M., Tighe, Michael, Kummer, Lawrence W., Lanzer, Kathleen G., Ward, Jerrold M., Lanthier, Paula, Kim, In-Jeong, Kuki, Atsuo +3 more·2018·PLoS Pathogens

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection during human pregnancy may cause diverse and serious congenital defects in the developing fetus. Previous efforts to generate animal models of human ZIKV infection and clinical symptoms often involved manipulating mice to impair their Type I interferon (IFN) signaling, thereby allowing enhanced infection and vertical transmission of virus to the embryo. Here, we show that even pregnant mice competent to generate Type I IFN responses that can limit ZIKV infection nonetheless develop profound placental pathology and high frequency of fetal demise. We consistently found that maternal ZIKV exposure led to placental pathology and that ZIKV RNA levels measured in maternal, placental or embryonic tissues were not predictive of the pathological effects seen in the embryos. Placental pathology included trophoblast hyperplasia in the labyrinth, trophoblast giant cell necrosis in the junctional zone, and loss of embryonic vessels. Our findings suggest that, in this context of limited infection, placental pathology rather than embryonic/fetal viral infection may be a stronger contributor to adverse pregnancy outcomes in mice. Our finding demonstrates that in immunocompetent mice, direct viral infection of the embryo is not essential for fetal demise. Our immunologically unmanipulated pregnancy mouse model provides a consistent and easily measurable congenital abnormality readout to assess fetal outcome, and may serve as an additional model to test prophylactic and therapeutic interventions to protect the fetus during pregnancy, and for studying the mechanisms of ZIKV congenital immunopathogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006994

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ICR suckling mice model is immunocompetent and has allowed researchers to investigate interferon-dependent antiviral compounds or vaccines.

    “The ICR suckling mice model are the immunocompetent mice, which have allowed researchers to investigate the interferon-dependent antiviral compounds or vaccine [20, 35].”

    From ICR suckling mouse model of Zika virus infection for disease modeling and drug validation (2018) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Materials and methods section (page unavailable) identifies the study’s mice as pregnant C57BL/6J mice, not ICR suckling mice. The Discussion (page unavailable) proposes this immunocompetent pregnancy model as a platform for preclinical vaccine and therapeutic testing, but does not say it has been used to investigate interferon-dependent antiviral compounds or vaccines. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szaba, F. M., Tighe, M., Kummer, L. W., Lanzer, K. G., Ward, J. M., Lanthier, P., Kim, I.-J., Kuki, A., Blackman, M. A., Thomas, S. J., & Lin, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • Trudeau Institute (US)
  • Global VetPathology (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Corresponding author
Lin, Jr-Shiuan
Venue
PLoS Pathogens
Published
2018-04-10
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
e1006994
ISSN
  • 1553-7366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7374
OpenAlex
W2797004612
Cited by
97
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 9
FWCI
14.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Pathogens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Trudeau Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
Keywords
Zika virus, pregnancy, placental pathology, intrauterine fetal death, congenital malformations, immunocompetent mice, type I interferon, placental blood vessels, vertical transmission
MeSH terms
Zika Virus Infection, Zika Virus, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Fetal Diseases, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Placenta Diseases, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Pregnancy Outcome, RNA, Viral, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review