Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing Plasma Phospho Tau, Total Tau, and Phospho Tau–Total Tau Ratio as Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers

Open access
Rubenstein, Richard, Chang, Binggong, Yue, John K., Chiu, Allen, Winkler, Ethan A., Puccio, Ava M., Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon, Yuh, Esther L., Mukherjee, Pratik, Valadka, Alex B., Gordon, Wayne A., Okonkwo, David O., Davies, Peter, Agarwal, Sanjeev, Lin, Fan, Sarkis, George, Yadikar, Hamad, Yang, Zhihui, Manley, Geoffrey T., Wang, Kevin K. W., and the TRACK-TBI Investigators, Cooper, Shelly R., Dams-O’Connor, Kristen, Borrasso, Allison J., Inoue, Tomoo, Maas, Andrew I. R., Menon, David K., Schnyer, David M., Vassar, Mary J.·2017·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

Importance: Annually in the United States, at least 3.5 million people seek medical attention for traumatic brain injury (TBI). The development of therapies for TBI is limited by the absence of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Microtubule-associated protein tau is an axonal phosphoprotein. To date, the presence of the hypophosphorylated tau protein (P-tau) in plasma from patients with acute TBI and chronic TBI has not been investigated. Objective: To examine the associations between plasma P-tau and total-tau (T-tau) levels and injury presence, severity, type of pathoanatomic lesion (neuroimaging), and patient outcomes in acute and chronic TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: In the TRACK-TBI Pilot study, plasma was collected at a single time point from 196 patients with acute TBI admitted to 3 level I trauma centers (<24 hours after injury) and 21 patients with TBI admitted to inpatient rehabilitation units (mean [SD], 176.4 [44.5] days after injury). Control samples were purchased from a commercial vendor. The TRACK-TBI Pilot study was conducted from April 1, 2010, to June 30, 2012. Data analysis for the current investigation was performed from August 1, 2015, to March 13, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Plasma samples were assayed for P-tau (using an antibody that specifically recognizes phosphothreonine-231) and T-tau using ultra-high sensitivity laser-based immunoassay multi-arrayed fiberoptics conjugated with rolling circle amplification. Results: In the 217 patients with TBI, 161 (74.2%) were men; mean (SD) age was 42.5 (18.1) years. The P-tau and T-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratio in patients with acute TBI were higher than those in healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the 3 tau indices demonstrated accuracy with area under the curve (AUC) of 1.000, 0.916, and 1.000, respectively, for discriminating mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score, 13-15, n = 162) from healthy controls. The P-tau level and P-tau-T-tau ratio were higher in individuals with more severe TBI (GCS, ≤12 vs 13-15). The P-tau level and P-tau-T-tau ratio outperformed the T-tau level in distinguishing cranial computed tomography-positive from -negative cases (AUC = 0.921, 0.923, and 0.646, respectively). Acute P-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratio weakly distinguished patients with TBI who had good outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended GOS-E, 7-8) (AUC = 0.663 and 0.658, respectively) and identified those with poor outcomes (GOS-E, ≤4 vs >4) (AUC = 0.771 and 0.777, respectively). Plasma samples from patients with chronic TBI also showed elevated P-tau levels and a P-tau-T-tau ratio significantly higher than that of healthy controls, with both P-tau indices strongly discriminating patients with chronic TBI from healthy controls (AUC = 1.000 and 0.963, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: Plasma P-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratio outperformed T-tau level as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for acute TBI. Compared with T-tau levels alone, P-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratios show more robust and sustained elevations among patients with chronic TBI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0655

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Rubenstein, R., Chang, B., Yue, J. K., Chiu, A., Winkler, E. A., Puccio, A. M., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Yuh, E. L., Mukherjee, P., Valadka, A. B., Gordon, W. A., Okonkwo, D. O., Davies, P., Agarwal, S., Lin, F., Sarkis, G., Yadikar, H., Yang, Z., Manley, G. T., Wang, K. K. W., and the TRACK-TBI Investigators, Cooper, S. R., Dams-O’Connor, K., Borrasso, A. J., Inoue, T., Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Schnyer, D. M., & Vassar, M. J.
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
74
Issue
9
Pages
1063
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2738010656
Cited by
260
References
7
FWCI
14.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing Plasma Phospho Tau, Total Tau, and Phospho Tau–Total Tau Ratio as Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0655
The paper
Rubenstein, R., Chang, B., Yue, J. K., Chiu, A., Winkler, E. A., Puccio, A. M., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Yuh, E. L., Mukherjee, P., Valadka, A. B., Gordon, W. A., Okonkwo, D. O., Davies, P., Agarwal, S., Lin, F., Sarkis, G., Yadikar, H., Yang, Z., Manley, G. T., . . . Vassar, M. J. (2017). Comparing Plasma Phospho Tau, Total Tau, and Phospho Tau–Total Tau Ratio as Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers. JAMA Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0655

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.