Association Between Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Levels and Long-term Disease Course Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Followed up for 12 Years
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Blood sample-based biomarkers that are associated with clinically meaningful outcomes for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have not been developed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) measurements as a biomarker of disease activity and progression in a longitudinal MS data set. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-center, ongoing, prospective observational cohort study of 607 patients with MS from the longitudinal EPIC (Expression, Proteomics, Imaging, Clinical) study at the University of California, San Francisco from July 1, 2004, through August 31, 2017. Clinical evaluations and sample collection were performed annually for 5 years, then at different time points for up to 12 years, with a median follow-up duration of 10 (interquartile range, 7-11) years. Serum NFL levels were measured using a sensitive single molecule array platform and compared with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging variables with the use of univariable and multivariable analyses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were disability progression defined as clinically significant worsening on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and brain fraction atrophy. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age of the 607 study participants at study entry was 42.5 (9.8) years; 423 (69.7%) were women; and all participants were of non-Hispanic European descent. Of 3911 samples sequentially collected, 3904 passed quality control for quantification of sNFL. Baseline sNFL levels showed significant associations with EDSS score (β, 1.080; 95% CI, 1.047-1.114; P < .001), MS subtype (β, 1.478; 95% CI, 1.279-1.707; P < .001), and treatment status (β, 1.120; 95% CI, 1.007-1.245; P = .04). A significant interaction between EDSS worsening and change in levels of sNFL over time was found (β, 1.015; 95% CI, 1.007-1.023; P < .001). Baseline sNFL levels alone were associated with approximately 11.6% of the variance in brain fraction atrophy at year 10. In a multivariable analysis that considered sex, age, and disease duration, baseline sNFL levels were associated with 18.0% of the variance in brain fraction atrophy at year 10. After 5 years' follow-up, active treatment was associated with lower levels of sNFL, with high-potency treatments associated with the greater decreases in sNFL levels compared with platform therapies (high-potency vs untreated: β, 0.946; 95% CI, 0.915-0.976; P < .001; high-potency vs platform: β, 0.972; 95% CI, 0.948-0.998; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that statistically significant associations of sNFL with relevant clinical and neuroimaging outcomes in MS were confirmed and extended, supporting the potential of sNFL as an objective surrogate of ongoing MS disease activity. In this data set of patients with MS who received early treatment, the prognostic power of sNFL for relapse activity and long-term disability progression was limited. Further prospective studies are necessary to assess the assay's utility for decision-making in individual patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies of NfL rely on serum.
“Third, the inconsistent use of serum versus plasma further complicates comparisons, as most studies of NfL rely on serum.4,6,9,12–14”
From Establishing demographic-based normative values for neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in serum and plasma samples (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
The sNFL Measurements section shows that this study used serum samples, and the Discussion mentions other studies using serum NfL. The paper does not establish that most NfL studies use serum rather than plasma, so it supports an example of serum use but not the claimed majority. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011 · see citing works
Serum neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis
Disanto, G., Barro, C., Benkert, P., Naegelin, Y., Schädelin, S., Giardiello, A., Zecca, C., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Leppert, D., et al. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24954 · Cited by 1,164 · see citing works
Self-citationMonitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis using serum neurofilament light protein
Novakova, L., Zetterberg, H., Sundström, P., Axelsson, M., Khademi, M., Gunnarsson, M., Malmeström, C., Svenningsson, A., Olsson, T., Piehl, F., et al. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004683 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Kuhle, J., Barro, C., Disanto, G., Mathias, A., Soneson, C., Bonnier, G., Yaldizli, Ö., Regeniter, A., Derfuss, T., Canales, M., et al. (2016) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458515623365 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Cross AH, Naismith RT. Established and novel disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis. J Intern Med. 2014;275(4):350-363. doi:10.1111/joim. 12203 · DOI
- Feinstein A, Freeman J, Lo AC. Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: what works, what does not, and what is needed. Lancet Neurol. 2015; 14(2):194-207. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70231-5 · DOI
- Housley WJ, Pitt D, Hafler DA. Biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Clin Immunol. 2015;161(1):51-58. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2015.06.015 · DOI
- Reuwer AQ, Heron M, van der Dussen D, Schneider-Hohendorf T, Murk JL. The clinical utility of JC virus antibody index measurements in the context of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;136 (suppl 201):37-44. doi:10.1111/ane.12840 · DOI
- Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2004;364(9451):2106-2112. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736 (04)17551-X · DOI · Paper page
- Bjartmar C, Kidd G, Mörk S, Rudick R, Trapp BD. Neurological disability correlates with spinal cord axonal loss and reduced N-acetyl aspartate in chronic multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 2000;48(6):893-901. doi:10.1002/1531-8249 (200012)48:6<893::AID-ANA10>3.0.CO;2-B 7. Petzold A, Eikelenboom MJ, Keir G, et al. Axonal damage accumulates in the progressive phase of multiple sclerosis: three year follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(2):206-211. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.043315 · DOI
- Lycke JN, Karlsson JE, Andersen O, Rosengren LE. Neurofilament protein in cerebrospinal fluid: a potential marker of activity in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;64(3):402-404. doi:10.1136/jnnp.64.3.402 · DOI
- Kuhle J, Barro C, Andreasson U, et al. Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54(10):1655-1661. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-1195 · DOI · Paper page
- Petzold A, Steenwijk MD, Eikelenboom JM, Wattjes MP, Uitdehaag BM. Elevated CSF neurofilament proteins predict brain atrophy: a 15-year follow-up study. Mult Scler. 2016;22(9): 1154-1162. doi:10.1177/1352458516645206 · DOI
- Weston PSJ, Poole T, Ryan NS, et al. Serum neurofilament light in familial Alzheimer disease: a marker of early neurodegeneration. Neurology. 2017;89(21):2167-2175. doi:10.1212/WNL. 0000000000004667 · DOI · Paper page
- Skillbäck T, Mattsson N, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light concentration in motor neuron disease and frontotemporal dementia predicts survival. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2017;18(5-6):397-403. doi:10.1080/21678421.2017. 1281962 · DOI
- Byrne LM, Rodrigues FB, Blennow K, et al. Neurofilament light protein in blood as a potential biomarker of neurodegeneration in Huntington's disease: a retrospective cohort analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(8):601-609. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422 (17)30124-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Kuhle J, Nourbakhsh B, Grant D, et al. Serum neurofilament is associated with progression of brain atrophy and disability in early MS. Neurology. 2017;88(9):826-831. doi:10.1212/WNL. 0000000000003653 · DOI
- Gisslén M, Price RW, Andreasson U, et al. Plasma concentration of the neurofilament light protein (NFL) is a biomarker of CNS injury in HIV infection: a cross-sectional study. EBioMedicine. 2015;3:135-140. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.11.036 · DOI · Paper page
- Cree BA, Gourraud PA, Oksenberg JR, et al; University of California, San Francisco MS-EPIC Team. Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era. Ann Neurol. 2016;80 (4):499-510. doi:10.1002/ana.24747 · DOI
- McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50(1):121-127. doi:10.1002/ana.1032 · DOI · Paper page
- Teunissen CE, Iacobaeus E, Khademi M, et al. Combination of CSF N-acetylaspartate and neurofilaments in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2009;72(15):1322-1329. doi:10.1212/WNL. 0b013e3181a0fe3f · DOI
- Norgren N, Sundström P, Svenningsson A, Rosengren L, Stigbrand T, Gunnarsson M. Neurofilament and glial fibrillary acidic protein in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2004;63(9):1586-1590. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000142988.49341.D1 · DOI
- Kuhle J, Leppert D, Petzold A, et al. Neurofilament heavy chain in CSF correlates with relapses and disability in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2011;76(14):1206-1213. doi:10.1212/WNL. 0b013e31821432ff · DOI
- Khalil M, Enzinger C, Langkammer C, et al. CSF neurofilament and N-acetylaspartate related brain changes in clinically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler. 2013;19(4):436-442. doi:10.1177/1352458512458010 · DOI
- Barro C, Benkert P, Disanto G, et al. Serum neurofilament as a predictor of disease worsening and brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2018;141(8):2382-2391. doi:10. 1093/brain/awy154 · DOI · Paper page
- Giovannoni G, Cutter G, Sormani MP, et al. Is multiple sclerosis a length-dependent central axonopathy? the case for therapeutic lag and the asynchronous progressive MS hypotheses. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;12:70-78. doi:10.1016/j. msard.2017.01.007 · DOI
- Gunnarsson M, Malmeström C, Axelsson M, et al. Axonal damage in relapsing multiple sclerosis is markedly reduced by natalizumab. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(1):83-89. doi:10.1002/ana.22247 · DOI
- Axelsson M, Malmeström C, Gunnarsson M, et al. Immunosuppressive therapy reduces axonal damage in progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2014;20(1):43-50. doi:10.1177/1352458513490544 · DOI
- Kuhle J, Disanto G, Lorscheider J, et al. Fingolimod and CSF neurofilament light chain levels in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2015;84(16):1639-1643. doi:10.1212/WNL. 0000000000001491 · DOI
- Novakova L, Axelsson M, Khademi M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers as a measure of disease activity and treatment efficacy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurochem. 2017;141(2):296-304. doi:10.1111/jnc.13881 · DOI
- Piehl F, Kockum I, Khademi M, et al. Plasma neurofilament light chain levels in patients with MS switching from injectable therapies to fingolimod. Mult Scler. 2018;24(8):1046-1054. doi:10.1177/ 1352458517715132 · DOI
- Arrambide G, Espejo C, Eixarch H, et al. Neurofilament light chain level is a weak risk factor for the development of MS. Neurology. 2016;87(11): 1076-1084. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003085 · DOI
- Kuhle J, Kropshofer H, Haering DA, et al. Blood neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of MS disease activity and treatment response. Neurology. 2019;92(10):e1007-e1015. doi:10.1212/WNL. 0000000000007032 · DOI
- Chitnis T, Gonzalez C, Healy BC, et al. Neurofilament light chain serum levels correlate with 10-year MRI outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5(12):1478-1491. doi:10.1002/acn3.638 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blood neurofilament light: a critical review of its application to neurologic disease
Barro, C., Chitnis, T., & Weiner, H. L. (2020) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.51234 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Self-citationPicca, A., Guerra, F., Calvani, R., Romano, R., Coelho-Júnior, H. J., Bucci, C., & Marzetti, E. (2021) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom11101508 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Borko, T. L., Ritchie, A., Selva, S., Sillau, S., Engebretson, E., Wolf, A. B., Alvarez, E., Gross, R., Gutierrez, E., Corboy, J., et al. (2026) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical · doi:10.1177/20552173261466440 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cantó, E., Barro, C., Zhao, C., Caillier, S. J., Michalak, Z., Bove, R., Tomic, D., Santaniello, A., Häring, D. A., Hollenbach, J., Henry, R. G., Cree, B. A. C., Kappos, L., Leppert, D., Hauser, S. L., Benkert, P., Oksenberg, J. R., & Kuhle, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
- Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine, and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Corresponding author
- Oksenberg, Jorge R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-11-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1359
- ISSN
- 2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6692664
- OpenAlex
- W2968485766
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 17.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS026799, R35NS111644)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, serum neurofilament light chain, blood biomarkers, disability progression, Expanded Disability Status Scale, brain atrophy, disease activity, disease progression, MS subtypes, treatment status, longitudinal follow-up, single molecule array, magnetic resonance imaging, EPIC study, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, treatment response monitoring, relapse monitoring, disease-modifying therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review