Cited by 740Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa

Kuhle, Jens, Barro, Christian, Andreasson, Ulf, Derfuss, Tobias, Lindberg, Raija, Sandelius, Åsa, Liman, Victor, Norgren, Niklas +2 more·2016·Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Abstract

Background Neuronal damage is the morphological substrate of persisting neurological disability. Neurofilaments (Nf) are specific cytoskeletal proteins of neurons and their quantification has shown encouraging results as a biomarker for axonal injury. Methods We aimed at comparing a widely used conventional ELISA for Nf light chain (NfL) with an electrochemiluminescence-based method (ECL assay) and a newly developed single-molecule array (Simoa) method in clinically relevant cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum samples. Results Analytical sensitivity was 0.62 pg/mL for Simoa, 15.6 pg/mL for the ECL assay, and 78.0 pg/mL for the ELISA. Correlations between paired CSF and serum samples were strongest for Simoa (r=0.88, p Conclusions We found Simoa to be more sensitive than ELISA or the ECL assay. Our results support the feasibility of quantifying NfL in serum; the results correlate with the more-established CSF NfL test. The highly sensitive Simoa technology deserves further studies in larger patient cohorts to clarify whether serum NfL could be used in the future to measure disease severity and determine prognosis or response to treatment interventions in neurological diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/cclm-2015-1195

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The analytical sensitivity of quantifying NfL in blood is greatly increased by Simoa technology compared to classical ELISA and ECL technologies.

    “The analytical sensitivity quantifying NfL in blood has been greatly increased by utilizing the single-molecule assay (Simoa) technology, as compared to the classical ELISA and ECL technologies (6), facilitating studies into NfL as biomarker for a wide range of clinical conditions on a large scale.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuhle, J., Barro, C., Andreasson, U., Derfuss, T., Lindberg, R., Sandelius, Å., Liman, V., Norgren, N., Blennow, K., & Zetterberg, H.
Affiliations
  • Neurology, Departments of Medicine, Biomedicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
  • Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • UmanDiagnostics, Umeå, Sweden
  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Venue
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2016-04-12
Volume
54
Issue
10
Pages
1655-1661
ISSN
  • 1434-6621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1437-4331
OpenAlex
W2342233016
Cited by
740
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 10
FWCI
46.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
neurofilament light chain, Simoa, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, ELISA, single molecule array, cerebrospinal fluid, serum biomarkers, multiple sclerosis, axonal injury, analytical sensitivity, method comparison
MeSH terms
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Immunoassay, Luminescent Measurements, Multiple Sclerosis, Biomarkers, Neurofilament Proteins, Electrochemical Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review