Cited by 229Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

First-Line Erlotinib Therapy Until and Beyond Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Progression in Asian Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The ASPIRATION Study

Park, Keunchil, Yu, Chong-Jen, Kim, Sang-We, Lin, Meng-Chih, Sriuranpong, Virote, Tsai, Chun-Ming, Lee, Jong-Seok, Kang, Jin-Hyoung +5 more·2016·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Continuing molecularly targeted treatment beyond disease progression in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has appeared promising in retrospective analyses, highlighting the challenge to identify whether progression is the optimal time to switch treatment. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of first-line erlotinib therapy in patients with NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations and postprogression erlotinib therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: ASPIRATION (Asian Pacific trial of Tarceva as first-line in EGFR mutation) was a phase 2, open-label, single-arm study conducted from 2011 to 2012 in 23 centers in Hong Kong, Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand of adults with stage IV, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, with ECOG performance status 0 to 2. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received erlotinib 150 mg/d orally until disease progression, after which erlotinib therapy could be continued at patient and/or investigator discretion. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS1; time to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 progression or death). Secondary end points included PFS2 (time to off-erlotinib progression if erlotinib therapy was extended beyond progression at patient and/or investigator discretion), objective response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety. The use of plasma-based assessment of EGFR mutations was also investigated. RESULTS: Of 359 patients screened, 208 were enrolled. Median follow-up was 11.3 (95% CI, 10.9-13.0) months. Of the 207 intent-to-treat patients (62.3% female; median age, 60.8 [range, 28-89] y), 176 had a PFS1 event (171 progression and 5 deaths); of these, 78 discontinued and 93 continued erlotinib therapy following progression. Median PFS1 was 10.8 (95% CI, 9.2-11.1) months. Median PFS1 and PFS2 in the 93 continuing patients was 11.0 (95% CI, 9.2-11.1) and 14.1 (95% CI, 12.2-15.9) months, respectively. Median PFS1 and PFS2 was 11.0 (95% CI, 9.3-12.0) and 14.9 (95% CI, 12.2-17.2) months in patients with exon 19 deletions or L585R mutations. Overall response rate was 66.2%; disease control rate was 82.6%. Median overall survival was 31.0 months (95% CI, 27.3 months to not reached). In the safety population (n = 207) serious adverse events were reported in 27.1%, with events of at least grade 3 experienced by 50.2%. Sensitivity and specificity of plasma-based EGFR mutation analysis was 77% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ASPIRATION supports the efficacy of first-line erlotinib therapy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and that treatment beyond progression is feasible and may delay salvage therapy in selected patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01310036.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4921

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, K., Yu, C.-J., Kim, S.-W., Lin, M.-C., Sriuranpong, V., Tsai, C.-M., Lee, J.-S., Kang, J.-H., Chan, K. C. A., Perez-Moreno, P., Button, P., Ahn, M.-J., & Mok, T.
Affiliations
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
  • The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • Roche Products Pty Ltd, Dee Why, Australia
Corresponding author
Park, Keunchil
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
305
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2218718059
Cited by
229
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 21 · 2014: 1
FWCI
25.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
erlotinib, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, first-line therapy, progression-free survival, Asian patients, targeted therapy, objective response rate, overall survival, safety and tolerability, tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, T790M mutation, EGFR exon 19 deletion
MeSH terms
Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Disease-Free Survival, Asian People, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review